Sentences with phrase «see any reason against»

But I see the reason against abolishing the work permit.

Lastly, I don't see any reason against holding the same funds in a taxable account as in an IRA (unless the funds in the IRA are particularly tax - inefficient and therefore not well suited to a taxable account).

Not exact matches

The sites, which often act as launching pads for smear campaigns against entertainment properties that users don't like for one reason or another, are being credited for sinking films before they even see the light of day.

Since rising interest rates means the bond's fixed rate is not competitive against newly issued bonds at higher market rates, then it stands to reason that longer - term bonds (those with longer to pay at the lower rate) are going to see their prices fall further than short - term bonds.

While we have no reason to suspect anything untoward, we would recommend that Whaleclub users diversify their trading with other providers to protect against the obvious risks we have all seen in the digital and crypto currency space.

Still, the most compelling reason to argue against expensive weddings is that while many things needed for a memorable wedding cost money, the most important ones — a kiss at the altar, a mother's tear as she sees her son make a lifelong commitment — are free.

@Mujeeb 1) zakir naik is an idiot, the only reason why u don't see anyone actually winning against him is because whoever posts his videos deletes the parts where christians do answer and kick hi ass.

I did see one point in Tony Perkin's article that resonated with me and that was the warning of crossing the line and reverse discriminating against people who feel, for whatever reason that GLBT is wrong.

@HawaiiGuest You see your reasoning goes against the most logical reasoning, even the experts see flaws in their reasoning.

The reason why it doesn't help is that you operate on the automatic assumption that your right, and can not see anything that is brought up against the concept of the christian god because it is outside your own preconceived notions.

You will soon see the voices of reason begin speaking out against this madness.

tf: Did you once consider that maybe the reason it appears we speak out more against your god than other gods is because it is your gods believers that seem to be at the center of so much in this world??? I don't see Pagan's standing on street corners or attempting to use their holy books to deny equal rights.

While she admits she's not against nude scenes theoretically, she told Allure she sees only one result of going nude: «If anything, it was just going to exploit me for no reason.»

Theologians who have quite properly protested against the notion that God was such that he needed to be made friendly and available to his creatures by reason of some event (in this case the death of Christ) which opened up for him this possibility, have failed to see that in this inadequate and often misleading way of speaking, there was an insight of which they should have taken due account.

When this occurs against the back drop of Christianity, a person may think that the reason they are hearing something or seeing visions is a sign of some sort because they are supposed to do something, or are chosen somehow.

And if we have good reason to trust Him, then when we see things that seem to go against our sense of goodness and justice, it seems only fair to give the benefit of the doubt to God, who just might know something more than we know.

These people would not allow any religion but Christianity to be seen in a good light if taught in classes in the USA, when history proves that, Christianity is the reason so many people in the USA have been motivated to lynch black people, make gays second class citizens, fought against woman being allowed to vote, hunted down and killed others from different denominations, force all other's to pay for their «work» whether in the USA or around the world through tax exempt status, gifts or «Faith - based initiatives».

They see it as a slap in the face for some reason (I'm not against them, though, just the idea that somehow a 2000 - year old Middle Eastern carpenter «died for me» (they never have a good answer as to what that really means)-RRB- and question why they spent so much money on my Catholic education.

Hence, while I believe that Griffin has every right to maintain that free - will theodicies are implausible and to encourage us to agree, I see no reason why I, or any other FWT, needs to admit (at least on the basis of anything that Griffin has argued) that FWTs can not defend themselves successfully against the claim that free - will theism «can not provide a plausible theodicy.»

But misery loves company, and the left is constantly on the lookout to see if they can find someone» anyone» on the «Catholic right,» voicing criticism against Benedict, even if for entirely different reasons....

It can be seen that the reason that churches are against homosexual marriage is not because it is explicitly said by God, but because of a lack of instruction to specifically allow it.

Yet, against all reason and evidence, there are those who insist that the world is flat or that they have seen Elvis Presley or been captured by space aliens.

Karl Barth, Rudolf Bultmann, Friedrich Gogarten and Emil Brunner turned to the teaching of the Protestant reformers of the 16th century for inspiration, and while these so - called neo-orthodox theologians did not simply repristinate the theology of Luther and Calvin, they saw no reason to abandon the prejudices of the reformers against scholastic theology.

It can be seen that the reason that churches are against hom ose xual marriage is not because it is explicitly said by God, but because of a lack of instruction to specifically allow it.

They may have nothing against it, but large numbers of them see no reason to continue their parents» loyalty.

As we have seen in the case of Frederick II, the reasons that kings and emperors, even those at war with the papacy, listed heresy first among the crimes against the state were several and profound.

The church, for whatever nonsense reasons, see birth control as against their beliefs.

Martin weighs the merits of his «all truths are timeless,» or can be so formulated without loss of truth, against what he takes to be my view (for no reason in my writings that I can see) that all are time - bound; he ignores the moderate or less extreme view that some (namely, truths about extremely universal and abstract, eternal and necessary things, including the essential structure of time as such) are timeless, and others (those about less universal and abstract, also non-eternal and contingent things) are time - bound, but this not in every way a careless thinker might suppose but in a definite and logically intelligible way.

If we had signed Lukaku I see little reason why he could not have started against Liverpool, same for Hernandez or Janssen or even Morata.

You are correct when you say it's the content of the posts against Wenger that I object to, as does Pires and many other so calle AKB»S (stupid abbreviation) But when Jon, for whatever reason, does not see this and continues to play the almighty I react, sometimes as badly as I think he has done.

SEE MORE: Brendan Rodgers» Liverpool future: 4 reasons for & against sacking, with report claiming boss's job is unsafe Keep or sell: Liverpool fans vote on futures of 18 stars in the Echo Liverpool transfer news

That's a big reason why we saw Jabari playing more as a defensive 3, which also made sense because he's lacking in the areas where Giannis excels and OK at the things Giannis is less good at (ie moving feet one - on - one on perimeter against wings).

lst season at stamford bridge, was the first time i saw that 4 -1-4-1 formation being used, and for some weird reason i feel a very strange negative vibe and well all know the outcome.the manager has come back with this formation and its not yielding result, but he still sticks with it.i do nt know much about formations dear friends, but if you are playing a slow dm in arteta and a very very slow cb, then you are toast against quality teams with sound tactics.wen playing wellbeck as a lone striker, i think 4 -2-3-1, will work better, but if we have a big player like oliver (boooos), thn we can try the 4 -1-4-1, thingy cos he can hold the ball for our midfielders to run in.but on the overall, shame on wenger for not giving our defence a good cover DM.NO BODY PLAYS A SLOW DM / CB AND EXPECT TO B REGARDED AS CHAMPIONSHIP MATERIAL.IT HURTS GUYS, REALLY HURTS.

That was one of the big reasons for our way day woes against the big Premier League teams last season but we have been seeing a much more patient and disciplined Arsenal this season, some of the time at least.

There is no reason why he can not cut in and shoot like we have see him do before, but to make him a CF I think would handicap his abilities slightly, especially against certain teams where we need more physicality up front.

Wenger decided not to play Xhaka in the first game against Liv, I could see his reasoning, but Xhaka was here allot longer than one or two weeks and yet he does it the other way round.

Perhaps it is more and more on here seeing no reason to argue against this sentiment and are finding it harder to defend some of his actions / in - action?

Watch the fa cup final closely and you will see ramsey free role and relentless forward runs was one of the reasons chelsea couldnt defend against us especially in 1st half.

i think this could officially be the start of the end for wenger his blind arrogance has cause him to buy welbeck in the sheer belief that AGAINST THE ODDS HE CAN BEAT THE REST OF THE BIG 4 WITH ONE ARM BEHIND HIS BACK we should be buying top top top european c / l standard players not sunderland spuds everton standard players thats about welbecks standard of club in all truthful reality he is an honest hard working player but wenger thinks he can coach the mediocrity out of him he is truely insane its a guaranteed source of goals we need not more fancy hold up play and «pace» and missing chance after chance so the postman is to be joined by the manchester metro tram absolute disgrace he has kidded on ozil and sanchez they must be wondering what is going on atm they are seeing the true wenger now just panicking and not panicking very well to that effect and for some reason wenger has gone all kinky for english players for some strange reason at least chambers has great potential welbeck has past that stage and is a seasoned pro now and he is no where near what we need wenger is trying to show how great he is by whiping the back out of the same players week after week in the vain hope that he can win the league without rotating ever and they will get injured and he wont have learned his lesson and we will pay for it in the end best last day transfer would have been a 4 year contract for klopp

Jack Wilshere was missing in midweek for the same reason and so it remains to be seen if he recovers in time, while there should be a first home appearance for Mkhitaryan after he came off the bench against the Swans.

Those are coverage skills; I see no reason why Notre Dame can't start matching up Jones against the other team's top wideout.

As you can see, it hasn't been a profitable strategy to bet against the public during the 2016 - 17 college basketball season, and there are many reasons for that.

He looked cool, calm and collected against the Singapore XI earlier today and hardly put a foot wrong, so I see no reason why he will not be regular starter for Arsene Wenger again in the coming months.

So I see no reason why he should not feature against Man U, especially if Sanchez himself says he is fit to play.

and I don't see a reason to hold that against them.

2nd you will loose on his much needed value if you let him off for free next season instead of making good use of this money to obtain a decent replacement someone like Mahrez or whom ever else would be a much better asset in that scenario plus Sanzhez being South American and all shall be very vocal about it and will throw tantrums and negative images through out the season for keeping him against his will and will simply will act childish which we all saw is very capable of and this would seriously affect team spirit for no good reason if you can actually avoid all that and offload him for a decent price now

I would say Vidal is a DM and reasons for seeing him further forward is that juve are shoulders above everyone in Italy so will come up against some staunch defending and occasionally a teammate will have him covered.

I agree that for whatever reason SANCHEZ holds a grudge is against WENGER mostly and it was definitely by benching him against Pool in probably the most critical game for us last season, if the man is not happy let him go, we don't need a disgruntled player in our dressing room no matter who he is, now this being said, it was because of him that we are now seeing changes and active transfer window, WENGER motivated and actively pursuing WC players, looking to drop under performing players, if it was not because ALEXIS and the Fans who last year had their voice heard and made it clear to the board and WENGER that is enough is enough....

This season, we've had one of the most diverse attacking setups we've had in a long time, yet for some reason we seem to not deploy these setups effectively, for example against Chelsea away, we had seen in their game against Tottenham that they were poor at defending aerial threats, yet we didn't play Giroud.

6 months later Ronda lost against Holly, that is when they brought Cyborg in for catchweight fights, but at that point there was no reason for her to keep cutting weight, because Ronda no longer had a title, or was seen as in invincible force.