«Many people
see it as a moral issue, because it necessarily involves defining what «life» means; on this kind of topic, a lot of people look to their faith.»
«In many of the specifics of the way people view climate change — for instance,
seeing it as a moral issue and understanding that climate change is going to hurt people in developing countries and the world's poor the most — we saw really large shifts.»
And crucially, churches in the U.S. have just begun to take up this issue in big numbers, which
they see as a moral issue of not just protecting God's Creation, but also not inflicting direct harm on helpless people around the world.A new coalition of environmentalists, aid groups, and churches have been pivotal in changing the momentum for the new «Climate Security Act» co-sponsored by Senator John Warner.
Not exact matches
The Ab debate will NOT go away, because in a world which the fundies perceive
as a morass of «
moral relativism», it's the one
issue they
see as «absolute», and can hang their Anal Retentive hats upon.
I commend the pastor for his
moral conviction but the majority of blacks are incapable of voting on any other
issue but race... its genetic... Obama could say he is an ax murderer and they still will find a way to justify their vote for him... another words Obama
sees the black vote
as in the bag and he is right... most of them are incapable of critical thinkng
Nevertheless, without the spiritual and
moral resources which prayer exists to heighten, the action required for dealing with such
issues is likely to go on being
as limited and
as misdirected by self - interest
as we now
see it.
(CNN)-- Billy Graham, the dean of American evangelists, has once again broken his usual silence on hot - button
issues, defending the president of the Chick - fil - A restaurant chain for his opposition to same - sex marriage days after
issuing a letter decrying what he
sees as the nation's
moral decay.
Its move to decry what he would
see as moral decay «would be tied to the Obama administration,» he argued, asking rhetorically why Graham would not have
issued the statement in response to an event like the Abu Ghraib torture scandal.
The big
issue as I
see it, the one I identified in my first comment, is the pair of notions that (1) we can choose to believe or choose to disbelieve in certain religious ideas and that (2) this choice is a
moral triumph or a
moral failure that is rewarded with heaven or punished with hell depending on how we choose.
I love it that my friend and you are wrestling with people who both of you
see as OK guys with similar outlooks on social and
moral issues and get on really well together but even though we can converse on belief the Old Testament is a massive stumbling block, a 100 foot high brick wall.
We no longer
see it
as a weighty
moral issue; it is now more about manners than
morals.
When Millennials understand that Christianity is firmly established
as «Truth» confirmed by «Science,» then Christianity is
seen as having
moral authority and the judgment of Christ on
issues such
as gay marriage will hold more power.
@ Adam Sorry, man, you are not understand what I am say, both on the
moral issue and on what you
see as an apparent contradiction.
I could
see,
as the students had dinner and held discussions on
moral and spiritual
issues, that that soft spot and that presence went a long way toward strengthening the program.
At this point, concerning controverted
moral issues, political manoeuvring became a major, if not the major concern of the Church, and magisterial proclamation has tended to be
seen as nothing more than a slightly frustrating bottom line of what can be got away with.
The core
issues that properly concern theologians and pastors,
as Cobb knows, have to do with the kind of theological - ethical glasses one wears
as one attempts to discern the
moral and spiritual meanings of the data, to
see in what respects they comport with our deepest understanding of how God wants us to live in the world.
«I want to
see the government re-open
as much
as anyone, but this bill fails to fix the
moral issue we must solve,» Gillibrand said.
That is why I
see posing this
issue as primarily a «research problem» is part of a greater
moral, economic, spiritual and systemic disfunction.
Global warming is being
seen by many groups
as a
moral issue.
As the pope will surely stress, his understanding of Christian ethics compels him to see climate change as a profoundly moral issu
As the pope will surely stress, his understanding of Christian ethics compels him to
see climate change
as a profoundly moral issu
as a profoundly
moral issue.
Now, of course, many
see the Pope's claim about morality unsurprising but fail to understand the profound significance for climate policy - making of understanding climate change fundamentally
as a
moral issue.
The evidence for this widespread failure to understand the practical significance of
seeing climate change
as a
moral issue includes the almost universal failure of the press or advocates of climate change policies to ask those governments, businesses, organizations, or individuals who oppose national climate change policies on the grounds of national economic cost alone whether they deny that in addition to national economic interest nations must comply with their obligations, duties, and responsibilities to prevent harm to millions of poor, vulnerable people around the world.
To take
issue with the
moral and political arguments that emerge from the climate debate, is
seen as equivalent to taking
issue — to denying — climate science.
His comment after the lecture, which seems to be your
issue, reflects his
moral base and societies current state,
as he
sees it.
The evidence for this widespread failure to understand the practical significance of
seeing climate change
as a
moral issue includes the almost universal failure of the press or advocates of climate change policies to ask businesses, organizations, or individuals who oppose national climate change policies on the grounds of economic cost alone, whether they deny that, in addition to economic interests, nations must comply with their obligations, duties, and responsibilities to prevent harm to millions of poor, vulnerable people around the world.
Whether these developments were
seen as necessary to reflect the view of law
as a positivist development, strictly separated from
moral considerations or
as required by the commercial practices of the nine - teenth century, is an
issue that I need not now explore.
This whole disagreement vis a vis a simple
moral / legal
issue is just another reason why Ms Aitken loathes the so - called «organized» real estate industry, wherein so many therein are
seen, obviously justifyably so,
as being simple agents of a goofy, behind - the - scenes let's - make - a-deal mentality that defies good common sense vis a vis «who - the - hell - is - whom - working - for anyway?