Sentences with phrase «see as the error»

I thought it had heralded the truth, and for three decades afterward I felt it to be binding truth, but at fifty - three years of age, I now see it as error, an unfortunate one whose cost to me was an anti-spiritual, depleted existence through the prime of my life.

You want to «rescue» us from what you see as the error of our ways, do you not?

Look at it this way: you feel like you are trying to turn me from what you see as the error of my ways.

But the way we are this season, I have no words to describe it because am not sure what is going on or who is in charge on the field or even if our players care enough about it seeing as the errors should be avoidable for most part.

If you don't see it as an error the first time, your mind already makes the correction and you won't «see» it as wrong anymore.

What he sees as errors in statistical analysis look like dishonesty or fraud to many of us.

He did note that if the appellant had possessed greater familiarity with court procedure, that could have led to a different result, but this was not seen as an error attributable to the trial judge:

Not exact matches

That is defensible only if one is certain that the baseline level of possible robotic error in civilian protection exceeds that baseline level of human error... I, for one, would not bet against the possibility that for some military applications, we will some day come to see mere human judgment as guaranteeing an unacceptable level of indiscriminate and disproportionate violence.

Accounting software can not only help you reduce human errors in your calculations, but it can help you gain insights into your business that you couldn't see in paper form — such as generating sales forecasts for the next quarter, determining which items are overstocked, and pinpointing your least profitable service.

Ray stated that the pain of this error allowed him to change his attitude towards mistakes, and to see them as puzzles that needed to be solved instead.

I'm guessing that's a typo and the author meant $ 64, but to be honest, I've seen several similar errors like this as of late.

As Alan Blinder has said, small errors will, in the eyes of history, be seen as bull's - eyeAs Alan Blinder has said, small errors will, in the eyes of history, be seen as bull's - eyeas bull's - eyes.

As I read this immedetly see one error.

JPL alleged that Coppedge «was seen as stubborn, unwilling to listen and always having to do things his way, which frustrated project members and resulted in errors.»

Or do you mean it as in may God «Bless» you to become a Christian and see the error of your ways, and may he «Bless» you right to hell if you don't.

In The Literal Meaning of Genesis, he writes, «It is too disgraceful and ruinous, though, and greatly to be avoided, that he [the non-Christian] should hear a Christian speaking so idiotically on these matters, and as if in accord with Christian writings, that he might say that he could scarcely keep from laughing when he saw how totally in error they are.»

We do see God - inspired error in the Bible, such as in the book of Job, so is it possible there might be other such inspired and inerrant errors in Scripture?

Logically, he would discover God there, and he did not feel the need to make a transition from the ideal to the cosmological order, for the latter was seen as the region of sin, contingency and error, and hence quite irrelevant.

You say that if I'm determined not to see god in a misdiagnosis then I won't, which is spot on, but of course that can be turned around and applied to you as well, so we sort of reach an impass where you believe it must have been god to save a person from dying and I believe that it was just error or odds that a person could do that.

According to the Barna study, the percent of engagement people have with the Bible — from being engaged (reading the Bible at least four times a week), friendly (engaged with the Bible less than four times a week), neutral (read the Bible once a month or less and see the Bible as the inspired word of God, but acknowledge it can have some errors) and skeptical (see the Bible as «just another book of teachings written by men)-- has started to stabilize and return to its normal rates after the rate of skepticism increased by 4 percent to 14 percent and the rate of friendliness dropped 8 percent to 37 percent in 2011.

ALl one has to do is look at surrounding passages and see it is Jesus that's beoing referred to... Bart pretty much passes this along as an error... which is dishonest on his part...

As a result, they can no longer see the error of what they are doing.

As evidence Perreau - Saussine mentions the weighty influence of Cardinal Manning, who «saw papal infallibility as the way... to release the church from the grip» of secular statism, as well as the papal allocution of July 20, 1871, which deemed it «a pernicious error to claim that infallibility reasserts a right to depose sovereigns.&raquAs evidence Perreau - Saussine mentions the weighty influence of Cardinal Manning, who «saw papal infallibility as the way... to release the church from the grip» of secular statism, as well as the papal allocution of July 20, 1871, which deemed it «a pernicious error to claim that infallibility reasserts a right to depose sovereigns.&raquas the way... to release the church from the grip» of secular statism, as well as the papal allocution of July 20, 1871, which deemed it «a pernicious error to claim that infallibility reasserts a right to depose sovereigns.&raquas well as the papal allocution of July 20, 1871, which deemed it «a pernicious error to claim that infallibility reasserts a right to depose sovereigns.&raquas the papal allocution of July 20, 1871, which deemed it «a pernicious error to claim that infallibility reasserts a right to depose sovereigns.»

I'm now saved (for the 1st time) because I have truly seen the error of my ways (Need of a Saviour), repented to God, turned from all known sin, and have trusted in Jesus Christ's atoning sacrifice as the only means of my salvation.

As the Lausanne Covenant asserts, the Bible is «without error in all that it affirms» Although detailed inerrantists like John Montgomery and Harold Lindsell resist referring to the writer's intentions as a criterion for Biblical judgment, sensing, rightly, that its adoption undermines their position, they nevertheless use such a standard on occasion (see Lindsell's discussion of differences in Biblical numbers [NuAs the Lausanne Covenant asserts, the Bible is «without error in all that it affirms» Although detailed inerrantists like John Montgomery and Harold Lindsell resist referring to the writer's intentions as a criterion for Biblical judgment, sensing, rightly, that its adoption undermines their position, they nevertheless use such a standard on occasion (see Lindsell's discussion of differences in Biblical numbers [Nuas a criterion for Biblical judgment, sensing, rightly, that its adoption undermines their position, they nevertheless use such a standard on occasion (see Lindsell's discussion of differences in Biblical numbers [Num.

I do like the progressive Christian stance as you describe it — that there may be error in many of the books of the bible — but that people, even with our limited minds, can strive to see a more perfect vision than what was written.

The world was seen as a place of sin, error and contingency; it was not transformable, hence nothing else could be done except to flee from it.

In the minds of men and in the Church, a revealed truth can be compatible with an error in secular matters, as can be seen from the very fact that the Church declares contrary theories in theology to be equally «safe», that is to say, without danger to Revelation.

A strong case has been made by F. J. E. Woodbridge that Plato not only does not seriously regard his «perfect state» as realizable, but that he means to make us see the error of imposing perfection too rigorously on human fallibility.3 Edward Bellamy's Looking Backward illustrates the utopia which becomes a persuasive call to radical social reforms.4 It also illustrates one of the functions of utopian thought as a medium of realistic criticism of the present.

I have only fairly recently come to see the error of that belief, and how hurtful and unchristian it is to treat LGBT people as second class.

I have admitted, and all Christians ought readily to admit, the imperfections and blemishes that mar the empirical church in its institutional embodiment; we can see the errors that have marked its history, and we know that not only individual members but the structures of the institution as well are far from being sinless.

Skimpoles are incapable of gratitude toward authority because they can conceive of no error they need to be protected from; like spoiled children — precisely, in fact, like Damaged Young Men — they see all discipline as condemnatory and all condemnation as wicked.

This gross oversimplification is full of error, failing to see how men pretend irreligion as well as religion.

I see the problem as pre-dating Christ and the egoistic errors of thinking entering at the earliest stages, during the life of Jesus among the disciples, and in the formulation of the Gospels.

The lifestyle is not good and causes errors in judgement as we see here.

To see it as a unified doctrine would in fact be as much an error as it would be to identify it with the teachings and ideas of a single thinker.

Later, in his book Radical Imperative: From Social Ethics to Theology, Bennett confessed his mistakes, and came to see that his view of American foreign policy in the 1940s and 1950s, a view that took American policies as manifestations and realizations of the kingdom of God, was gravely in error.

But the thousands thrown out of work by their errors were seen as the real problem.

They see this spiritual reality as the only reality and all else as illusion or «error.»

Seen sub specie aeternitatis, encouraging someone to believe that we don't really know what God thinks about sexuality, and that each of us must work it out for ourselves, and anyway it doesn't matter much as long as we do our recycling and volunteer at a homeless shelter, is as serious an error as telling them that God hates them because they have homosexual feelings.

Where tradition is flouted and the rigid forms and categories of divine revelation are seen as malleable, it makes sense that attempted correctives will only commit the very error they intend to resolve, unconsciously swinging from one extreme to the other.

Tradition and aother biblical writings were given great weight as well, and the bible was not something that was seen as literal or without error... God inspired meant God was the muse or concept that moved people to write about their experiences, as well as a history and a bit of a rule book.

Will, Mike, Sam, and your little flock that follows your errors, as I can see the comments here with perhaps some others (that don't comment but look on) that enjoy someone else's disputes, because that's what TV and programs are made of in this warped world.

Wherefore... see that ye never cease your labour, your care and diligence, until ye have done all that lieth in you, according to your bounden duty, to bring all such as are or shall be committed to your charge, unto that agreement in the faith and knowledge of God, and to that ripeness and perfectness of age in Christ, that there be no place left among you, either for error in religion, or for viciousness in life.

I take my «job» here pretty seriously so if a recipe isn't working I'll problem solve it with the person, or go as far as to remake it to see if I made an error when writing the recipe up.

This season has seen the Belgian lose his all conquering reputation as more and more errors slip in to his game.

Despite seeing Emre Can take control of long ball forward by Palace, Bolasie harried the Germany U21 international and eventually forced him into an error as the ex-Bayern Munich man brought down the Leopards star.

It is no secret that Arsene Wenger hasn't been happy with our Arsenal defenders this season as he has complained so many times about their errors after defeats this season, and it only takes a quick glance at the «goals against» columns in the EPL table to see that we have a real problem on our hands.

SEE ALSO: Marko Arnautovic goal video: Man United stung by Stoke City wonder - strike Bojan goal video: Man United behind at Stoke after horrific defensive error Manchester United great heaps further pressure on Louis van Gaal as Mourinho waits in the wings

The Daily Star — quoting Turkish newspaper AMK — revealed that Besiktas were keen on the centre - back, while L'Equipe 21 [as per Foot Mercato] acknowledged that Olympique de Marseille are keen on bringing the player back to France, and see Djilobodji as an upgrade on the error - prone Karim Rekik.