Sentences with phrase «see climate change legislation»
I saw climate change legislation mentioned 1 time in that whole thing.
http://www.globalclimatescam.com/ Not exact matches
You suggest that activists saw climate change as a «golden opportunity to further a political agenda: reining in corporations, regulating free markets and imposing environmental legislation», and that these have prematurely politicised the science and caused «pushback» from the other side.
Some might see USCAP as being leaders in the industry around climate change - but I think their real goal is to ensure they dominate public discourse and have strong lobbying positions for any future climate / carbon legislation.
Just this week we have seen one of the most conservative Senators in the Senate Lindsey Graham being heckled and accused of betraying the Party merely for being willing to think about climate change legislation.
The United States» Congress won't pass domestic legislation without key developing countries like China, which is now a major greenhouse gas emitter signing on to reduction commitments; and China sees themselves as a developing country that has acted progressively and responsibly to address climate change when it technically has no obligation to do so under the UNFCCC.
Proponents of climate action see the prospect of EPA's rules as a not - so - secret weapon for motivating Congress to move faster on legislation, which the Obama administration and many lawmakers have said is a better way to mitigate climate change while minimizing costs.
It is too bad, as Andrew Price notes, that the «need to stop climate change» is not seen as an effective enough argument to convince Americans to rally around clean energy legislation.
Those interests among industry don't always align; on the issue of climate change legislation and regulatory actions, we have certainly seen this to be the case.
Very few politicians supporting any meaningful legislation on climate change, limited discussion in the Press and political debates, projections for increasing fossil fuel use as far out as the eye can see, etc..»
After the Waxman - Markey climate bill historically passed the US House of Reps, many saw their hopes renewed that legislation, however flawed, could actually be passed to combat climate change.
On the rise of climate skepticism; «there are 2,300 lobbyists in Washngton DC, whose only job is to see no policy, no legislation comes into existence that will tackle the problem of climate change.»
This obligation would likely impose a need to discuss the financial and operational impacts of environmental protection and climate change legislation on the issuer's business, which may include such things as the recent legislation and proposed legislation in B.C. (see a summary of climate change legislation here), Ontario (see, for example the proposed Environmental Protection Amendment Act) and in the U.S. (see, for example the draft American Clean Energy and Security Act colloquially known as Waxman - Markey) all, therefore, need to be taken to account.