Not exact matches
Others,
like faculty member at the University of Nicosia, George Papageorgiou, are optimistic about bitcoin's future and
see the block size
debate as a healthy ongoing conversation, as bitter as it has been.
At that point, it was about masturbation only (no one had made a comparison to homosexuality), so, without much personal stake in the
debate, I thought to myself «
See, this is why people don't
like the answers, not (always) because it doesn't let them do what they want, but because the answers are sometimes very poor indeed.»
I would love to
see more long, informative
debates like this on all major issues.
Besides that, you might
see a lot of heated
debate on boards
like these, but in real life, do you think that atheists seek out Christians in the street or in the stores or at the workplace and berate them?
What I find interesting about
debates like the one this article engendered is that so many atheists will argue «science,» yet they do not look to actual scientist / believers who made significant contributions to science, yet
saw no conflict in doing so while also believing in a «Creator.»
I
see it as a book about the Kingdom of God, and what life looks
like when you live into the «other side» of so many of our missing - the - point gender
debates in the Church.
God could make himself as obvious as gravity (since he made gravity as obvious as he made gravity), but he doesn't, and so there's no way to determine whether or not god exist and we continue to
debate him without any solid proof or meaningful evidence (
like we
see in biology and chemistry and such).
that our bishops be urged to form a panel of highly qualified men and women for handling any future incidents of this sort (they should not only be well informed but well used to
debating), and also for
seeing in a more general way that the Catholic case is properly presented or defended in the media: one thinks for instance of men
like Professors Peter Hodgson and John Haldane or Father Aidan Nichols); 3.
Listen I keep
seeing bumper stickers
like «you can't be both Catholic and pro-choice» these are not reflective of my faith, theser are slogans made for propaganda, I have 2 beautiful children and I have never been on a position where abortion could even play a part, but it is a legal option to the public at large; this being said even the bible calls for us to be good citizens, and to obey the law, I believe that this is a matter that belongs with the family and not the state; no matter how we criminalize abortion, they will not stop, but people will go under - ground and more fatalities will occur, I rather
see the government placing incentives on more conseling for these expectant mothers and more outreach done at church levels, to reduce the
debate to a single slogan is dangerous and will not accomplish the ultimately goal of preventing abortions my two humble cents
In an interview with an Atlanta magazine, «Carter fittingly used a parable to illustrate how he'd
like to
see the political / religious
debate unfold.
In van Buren's
debate with a left - wing Bultmannian
like Schubert Ogden we can
see what he is after.
It is significant that the terms of the
debate about faith in the world are deemed to have been set by people
like Richards Dawkins, just as it is significant that the
debate is
seen as a «political and secular», rather than a religious, one.
While there may be
debate as to whether the Washington - bound Browning is the greatest NorCal high school QB in history, there is no
debate that the state will not soon
see anything
like Browning and Folsom's 2014 season.
That
debate will go on as there will be many who prefer other options, but De Gea is certainly proving his worth to Man Utd and has certainly established himself as one of the best with saves
like those
seen on Saturday evening.
I would say that Xhaka is more of a deep lying playmaker than a DM, I would
like to
see a CM partner for him who will put themselves about and put their foot in for the tackle, I think Coquelin has done better at this in pre season although if he and Xhaka can form a partnership is still up for
debate.
I would most
like to
see you share your observations about the player you wished, how his qualities fit to our squad, and provide evidence on how said player can do a better job than another in the same role, so that everyone can
debate on the same grounds.
Should this even be a topic?Giroud is a player of average quality always surrounded by good players.I just don't get.It's as if only Arsenal fans rate him.This was a player who was bought to be the leading striker at Arsenal and after his years of failure which many deny he's now become a super sub?How laughable is that.From failure to super sub.If the so called world class striker we're signing goes out with an injury for about five months who comes in then.It seems to me people lack vision.Why is it always Giroud Giroud Giroud?After so many seasons people are still
debating what souldn't even be debatable.I've lost count of the number of times he's been talked about here.This is the problem with our club.It's just not ruthless.This is a player who should have been gone long ago but due to him being French he still gets the chances.We won't miss him when he goes and I'd
like to
see if he'd stand out in a smaller club.
You
see, comments
like «I don't understand that
debate.
OMG, our mates are strengthening and we here
debating how to keep obviously average players
like walcot, elneny, wilshere et all, Antonio conte had the balls to tel a world class striker
like diego costa to f *** off and we here
debating mediocrity, we seem to have short memory as arsenal fanz, thumb me down d way u
like, y ’ all gon protest nd moan and groan
like last season coz as at now i
see no phantom changes, still d same old system, same old players nd d deluded one probably closed for the transfer market after signing just one out of the numerous we actually need to compete.
Personally, I welcome — this being a
debate site - real people with real fan opinions and have no intention of saying less than I mean, since to me that is hypocritical at worst or sitting on the fence at best, in true Alan Smith style (as opposed to fine proper and honest, as they
see it, pundits
like NEVILLE, CARRAGHER AND SOUNESS, who are above all honest and earn their corn - unlike Walcott - by doing the job they are paid to do.)
so it always messes my brain to
see so much decision making and match making getting affected by ppvs, or the fans «
debating» so much about that... it is really a US thing were people are just balls deep into these things...
like social level capitalistic mentality..
guys i cant believe Laurent Koscielny, is the same height as vamerlyn i taught he was taller how the hell could wenger buy a defender the same height as the one we have when the nature of english football requires u to have good height at the back to prevent aerial bombardment as in the past and of course physical problems with the
likes of stoke and chelsea have wenger not learn from five trophyless seasons i cant believe this and still
debating if to buy a new defender i must say i had optimism for the new season but after
seeing this i think we are a dead horse again hell if this is the case then cesc should bolt and go to barca wenger nothing personal but i think ur an absolute idiot............
I watch these
debates all the time that occur on the
likes of Twitter and Facebook (sad I know) and I regularly
see the abuse that gets levelled at some fans if they stick up for players
like Adam Lallana or Simon Mignolet or the cardinal sin of all stocking up for Dejan Lovren.
It can be quite distracting (or amusing) to
debate the issue with people
like Tom who usualy
see or choose to interperet something different to real events — but that is not important — the important point is that the refs need to get the decisions right in real time — they are not doing that and the denial of the aid of technology by the PGMO is incomprehensible.
I would
like to
see a new front opened up in the gender
debate — a strong coalition of men and women who understand that expanding opportunities for men in the home and for women in the workplace are inextricably linked, and who advocate both with equal urgency, on behalf of both men and women — and who therefore argue robustly for the «next steps» in the path towards gender equality: equity in the leave entitlements for men and women.
I also,
like many others,
saw the title and lead copy as a journalistic strategy to ignite
debate and traffic to the Times.
My dream is to
see more, better quality, better - funded community programs addressing at - home food and nutrition for families of ALL socioeconomic means; only when we comprehensively deal with every source of calories and nutrients in the child's diet will things
like the chocolate milk
debate be exposed for the red herrings they actually are.
But it is the period from the 1870s when the first «descriptive writers»
like Henry Lucy began to convey the tone and feeling of
debates and comment on the personalities and foibles of MPs that we
see the origins of the parliamentary sketchwriter as compared with the political reporter.
I agree that I'd
like to
see electoral reform as one of the issues
debated in the leadership contest.
David Newland — screenwriter, producer and former National Geographic web video guy — watched last night's
debate with the eyes of a man who's
seen (and created) more online video than he'd probably
like to remember.
I'd
like to
see a Dinallo / Rice
debate — she's probably the only one who could hold her own against him.
There is a feeling that we may not
see their
like again, that we are doomed to a period in which politicians without character or backbone inundate our national
debate, ever more robotic and disconnected from their principles with each passing generation.
In August, he told the Guardian that Labour members did not
like being told who not to vote for and called on the parliamentary party to
see the leadership contest as exciting, rather than being frightened of
debate.
He added that Labour members did not
like being told who not to vote for and called on the parliamentary party to
see the leadership contest as exciting, rather than being frightened of
debate.
If you would
like to know more about primary races in your area or
see any of our past
debates, check out our special Decision 2017 page.
Let's
see if Labour brings this business -
like approach to the continuing gay marriage
debate.
It looks
like recent development could
see the terms of that
debate change for good.
«We have
seen how election periods in America and some parts of Europe are celebrated
like festivals; a period of
debates and healthy competitions that turn countries into frenzied environments for colors and carnivals.
It is particularly an issue for those of us who would
like to
see more young women involved in political activity and
debate in the wider society.»
You never know with him, but Paladino's campaign manager tells the Times that they
see «the
debate as an opportunity for him to reintroduce himself to skeptical voters and, perhaps, surprise them with his grasp of substantive issues,» so it seems as if he might embrace this opportunity to appear
like a serious person to voters, for once.
Concerning the cancellation of the
debate, Madam Tetteh revealed that from the discussions their NCCE platform, it appeared that Mr. Andah was concerned that protesters «constituted propaganda and he [Andah] would not
like to
see that present during the
debate.»
It looks
like New York voters will have only a single opportunity to
see the candidates
debate before this year's gubernatorial election.
The former comptroller added while he'd
like to
see a positive tone at the
debate, he won't let his challengers get away with half - truths or misinformation.
If you missed the
debate or would
like to
see it again in part or in its entirety, to help you make an informed choice (
see video below).
«
Like E.T., I want to go home,» said Mr. Rivera, a Bronx Democrat who can often be
seen editing home movies on his laptop during floor
debates.
I'd
like to
see every incumbent who refuses to
debate their challenger grilled the same way.
«If women understand that their right to choose is actually a topic of
debate, you will
see a female response
like you've never
seen at the polls,» Cuomo told reporters.
«I would
like to
see more substance, more
debate, more discussion.
«I would have
liked to have
seen an open discussion and
debate among the people interested in the nomination,» he said.
The
Debate Over Coroners Some experts
see coroners
like Minyard as throwbacks to an earlier, less scientific era.