Not exact matches
What should we
make of the fact that, under our last Republican president we
saw a great deal of federal intervention in
education policy and now, under a Democratic administration, we have a law that returns much of
education policymaking to the states?
Education secretary Nicky Morgan
made the announcement in a speech at the
Policy Exchange, saying that rural schools and coastal schools will be the focus on the new plans, which will
see teachers offered higher salaries, future leadership roles and relocation costs as incentives.
In
education, it is really interesting to
see teachers, parents, and students — who may depend on federal programs or have strong views on the administration's
education policies —
making their voices heard in a way I haven't
seen before.
For all these reasons and more, we haven't
seen the widespread changes President Obama or his Secretary of
Education, Arne Duncan, might have hoped for when they
made teacher evaluation one of their signature
policies.
CO ASCD's efforts to support teacher voice in
education decision making include hosting online conversations with policymakers (see Education Issues in Focus at www.coascd.org), conducting policy summits, inviting policymakers and educators to write policy - related blogs or articles for our newsletter, connecting with other organizations in the state that promote education advocacy (for example, Commissioner Anthes» Teacher Cabinet http://www.cde.state.co.us/cdecomm/teachercabinet), providing information about policy priorities in Colorado (for example, State Board of Education priorities (http://www.cde.state.co.us/cdeboard/sbe2017legpriorities), and participating in ASCD education advocacy ac
education decision
making include hosting online conversations with policymakers (
see Education Issues in Focus at www.coascd.org), conducting policy summits, inviting policymakers and educators to write policy - related blogs or articles for our newsletter, connecting with other organizations in the state that promote education advocacy (for example, Commissioner Anthes» Teacher Cabinet http://www.cde.state.co.us/cdecomm/teachercabinet), providing information about policy priorities in Colorado (for example, State Board of Education priorities (http://www.cde.state.co.us/cdeboard/sbe2017legpriorities), and participating in ASCD education advocacy ac
Education Issues in Focus at www.coascd.org), conducting
policy summits, inviting policymakers and educators to write
policy - related blogs or articles for our newsletter, connecting with other organizations in the state that promote
education advocacy (for example, Commissioner Anthes» Teacher Cabinet http://www.cde.state.co.us/cdecomm/teachercabinet), providing information about policy priorities in Colorado (for example, State Board of Education priorities (http://www.cde.state.co.us/cdeboard/sbe2017legpriorities), and participating in ASCD education advocacy ac
education advocacy (for example, Commissioner Anthes» Teacher Cabinet http://www.cde.state.co.us/cdecomm/teachercabinet), providing information about
policy priorities in Colorado (for example, State Board of
Education priorities (http://www.cde.state.co.us/cdeboard/sbe2017legpriorities), and participating in ASCD education advocacy ac
Education priorities (http://www.cde.state.co.us/cdeboard/sbe2017legpriorities), and participating in ASCD
education advocacy ac
education advocacy activities.
WHEREAS, the so - called «reform» initiatives of Students First, rely on destructive anti-educator
policies that do nothing for students but blame educators and their unions for the ills of society,
make testing the goal of
education, shatter communities by closing their public schools, and
see public schools as potential profit centers and children as measureable commodities; and
A new report published by Stanford's
Policy Analysis for California
Education (PACE)
makes the case for investing LCFF resources on research - based approaches in order to
see long - term improvements.
The federal government's role in elementary and secondary
education should be limited: It should work to create transparency so that parents can
see how their local schools measure up; it should support
policies that have a proven record; and it should
make sure states can't ignore students who need extra help.
This week's U.S. House passage of the Every Student Succeeds Act, a reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act, makes it clear: If you want to see education policy in the next few years, look to state capitols, not Washing
Education Act,
makes it clear: If you want to
see education policy in the next few years, look to state capitols, not Washing
education policy in the next few years, look to state capitols, not Washington, D.C.
The question of whether or not grammar schools are a good thing is one of the most divisive in the
education policy sphere, so we have fact - checked some of the recent claims
made by those who want to
see a return to the selective system set up by Butler's
education act in 1944.
Making the case that choice allows for all families, poor or middle class, to meet the particular needs of their children can win support, especially from white middle class families who realize that how they are hurt by school zones and other Zip Code
Education policies (and are also condescended by teachers and school leaders when they want more for their kids), but don't
see any other way to avoid those problems beyond paying for private schools out their own pockets.
The 2016 — 17 school year is sure to bring plenty of developments when it comes to
education policy, and like you, we're eager to
see what decisions are
made at the federal and state levels.