Sentences with phrase «see evidence of good»

Lenders want to see evidence of good cash flow, annual revenue and profitability.

Every day, the dating consultants can see evidence of their good work as emails pour in from clients thanking them for their caring assistance and helpful advice.

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein also says he has seen no evidence of good cause to fire Mueller.

In this particular moment, one day in 2013 in Hayward, California, I could see evidence of better days.

Not exact matches

Further evidence of the decline can be seen in the decreasing rates of first - time patents since the 1980s, as well as increases in demand for professional licensing, which could further restrict new business opportunities by requiring expensive (and often unnecessary) credentials.

Wired has a good roundup of the possibilities; some observers fear the company has no intention of reselling e-books, that it merely wants to block others from doing so, but intellectual property experts see no evidence of that.

She asked whether he has seen «any evidence of good cause» to fire Mueller.

Good evidence of this is the recent spate of infographics we've seen on social media and buyers.

Research findings from the Center for Talent Innovation, a New York - based think tank headed by Sylvia Ann Hewlett, found that having something inherently in common with the funder, decision maker or investor makes an enormous difference, since 56 percent of decision makers in the study did not value ideas they didn't personally see a need for, even when evidence suggests that it's a good, marketable idea.

It's customary there for doctors when they see evidence of terminal cancer in a person, not to tell them the truth but to tell them that everything is okay because they feel that it's better to make the patient feel good and not upset.

If it makes you feel better to think of it as mother nature or the laws of physics, or whatever other way you prefer to look at it, what you're seeing is the evidence of God's work.

There is no evidence of a god this side of the Big Bang; every thing we see has a pretty good scientific explanation based on evidence.

But there is evidence — beginning with Genesis 1, where we are told that God looked at the whole creation and saw that it was good — that biblical thinking is not nearly so anthropocentric as many interpreters of the Bible have supposed.

So rather than engaging with the mountains of evidence that I brought, because this situation was one of the most well - documented cases of institutional cover - up I have ever seen, ever, there was a complete refusal to engage with the evidence.

If God exists and is all good, we must have evidence that all of the evil we see are for a higher purpose.

As he researched these, the author began to see the powerful scientific evidence for creation as well as the evidence for the historical reliability of the Bible..

As I have read, ruminated, and wrestled with this I see the trend of Original Sin — that compulsion to seek godliness on our terms & not God's — evidenced in the history of secular humanity and borne by believers, the faithful as well as heterodox, into the congregation.

The New Jerusalem, however, poses a problem: for, though it can certainly be seen as evidence for Chesterton's Zionism and for his appreciation of the «mystical as well as mysterious» dimension of the Jewish heritage, it also contains passages which explain why Gopnik perceives Chesterton's agreement with the Zionist's perception that «we are aliens here» in a sinister light.

i will tell you that the one thing that god gave us is the power of will or choice and that is why we can decide to do good or bad or follow him or not but the evidence of a true christian is that person life will change and not is a small way.my people open your eyes and do not be fools to believe that there is no god because you know in your own heart while you say it, deep inside you can see that a god do exist and i do not need to tell you that or prove it to you because you know it is true.unfortunately there are false preachers who do not teach the truth or a halph truth which has led millions down the wrong path and today we see the result of it everywhere.

Both my pastor and my best girl friend in high school told me that in Genesis — when Isaac chose Jacob as his favored son and commanded him not to marry a Canaanite woman — we see evidence of God's desire to protect a certain racial order.

In other words, you're doing a good job of showing that you've seen no evidence of God as you define God.

Some evidences of its coming we see about us in redeemed lives and in a better society; for others we must hopefully wait, labor, and pray.

As evidence Perreau - Saussine mentions the weighty influence of Cardinal Manning, who «saw papal infallibility as the way... to release the church from the grip» of secular statism, as well as the papal allocution of July 20, 1871, which deemed it «a pernicious error to claim that infallibility reasserts a right to depose sovereigns.»

While I am not religious (I will call myself agnostic), and having an IQ well over genius levels, with scientific and mathematical tendencies, let me ask you a few questions, because what I see here are a bunch of people talking about «no evidence» or «proof» of God's existence, therefore He can't possibly exist, existential arguments, which are not arguments, but fearful, clouded alterations of a truth that can not be seen.

I throw a challenge to you guys, If the pastor got the courage to test his life without God to weigh the evidence of both world, why do nt you guys also try not for one year, just ONE WEEK a life with God by putting your trust in him, then you will be in a better position to see whether he really exist or NOT.

Casey, I think the best evidence God doesn't condemn gay people is when Christ met the Roman Centurion and said of him, Never have I seen faith great than this.

See the diffidence concerning the ability of modern knowledge of nature to be convincing evidence for God referred to in our review of Paul Haffner's quality book and our Cutting Edge column, as well its presence on our Letters» page.

We see ample evidence of such violence and domination by those who are «connected» in much of our world — by Afghan warlords as well as the tyrannical chair of the condo board.

The beliefs are just so far out there for me, that whenever I see someone in ardent support of them I have to think they're a troll, because I don't know how they could possibly believe or accept that (there are a few exceptions of people who pt things very well, cite supporting evidence, and are consistent and coherent - I don't agree with them, but I can at least understand what they're saying)

Through dialogue, these young men, precious to God, might come to see that the Christian view of Jesus is much earlier, more coherent, and better evidenced than the Muslim view of Jesus.

... I'm 38 she still can't tell me... She says he just is JUst faith - the evidence of things not yet seen... Well that is not a good enough answer... Then that would just make us also just who we are then now... Either way I don't worry cause whever life takes me / us it has to better than this economy... lolololol

@ Well, well you have your right to your thoughts and ideas as I have my right to mine... OF course I'd LOVE to see this evidence you seem to think exists that there is a gWell, well you have your right to your thoughts and ideas as I have my right to mine... OF course I'd LOVE to see this evidence you seem to think exists that there is a gwell you have your right to your thoughts and ideas as I have my right to mine... OF course I'd LOVE to see this evidence you seem to think exists that there is a god..

It is not believed because we do not see evidence of a worldwide flood and if there was one, the God who did it could not be a good God worthy of worship.

Let's look at Hebrews 11:1 - 6 for a better definition of faith: «1 Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.

Even if the chief Christian evidence for the reality of God is an invitation to «taste and see that the Lord is good», some Christians have offered intellectual arguments for the existence of God.

= > well good to see you understand that the odds of being right about the family are stacked against you based on your evidence and best tools available for testing.

As shown by the New York Times» own evidence, published for all to see on their website at the beginning of their well planned assault this Easter, the claim concerning what the «Pope -LSB-...] allowed» is false on two counts:

For the whole of the evidence on the female diaconate, see the well - documented but insufficiently integrated Report to the Archbishop of Canterbury entitled The Ministry of Women (London, 1919); also G. Huls, De dienstder vrouw in de Kerk (Wageningen, 1951).

Eventually, I will have some kind of panel done to see what I am allergic to, so that will be helpful for me in making better decisions, but until then I do want to stay gluten free because of ALL the overwhelming evidence that shows how it messes up our guts.

The evidence can be seen in the startling good looks and improved functionality of the winners of the 2015 Flexible Packaging Achievement Awards.

Jane Martin: Well, I mean, we've seen the evidence, there's been hundreds of submissions, the industry is the loudest voice opposing this and I think you need to ask the question why.

Akpom's a better dribbler, but as for a strikers instinct, I haven't seen any evidence as of yet.

But on the evidence of what we have seen this year, we are set to give it our best shot.

I see more AOB posts when compared to AKB though, these are posts made by people who was willing to share them and hope to add a thought to fellow Arsenal fans... well at least I think K seems to be pure Anti-Wenger and refuses to read anything other than what follows his opinion and that bugs me BUT isn't that evidence that Admin isn't sucking the cream out of Wengers «eclair»?

At least he has not been forgotten and this is further evidence that the young midfielder is still being seen as one of the best hopes for the future of his club and country.

Wenger put ozil on the wing for his development one thing i do nt get is how the fans do nt see that Wenger done the same process with Wilshere, I remember when Monreal was caught out at the back post from a set piece and ozil did nt cover he just jogged abit n let monreal get beat, that would be video evidence for Ozil to learn and work on his duty to defend instead of giving him Candy like a baby n letting him be lazy in the middle not tracking back for the team its a learning process im 100 % Wenger knows ozils best position is in the centre he followed him since Shalke its obvious but Wenger develops players into world class after seeing Ozil in the world cup and coming back after the world cup i coud see he defended alot more helping out monreal on the flanks and putting in alot more effort only then once hes showed his duty in defending will he be given his free role in the middle.

But I do NOT see any evidence of «I will show them how good I am» mentality whatever.

We see evidence of either intelligence or lack of it constantly in many players who we come to know well through their stay with Arsenal (or whatever club we all support).

It is a good job I've seen plenty of Pogba in other games in the past couple of seasons because solely on tonights» evidence I wouldn't take Pogba + cash for Ramsey.

Not to mention the fact that the one thing Korkmaz is supposed to be good at (shooting) we've seen no evidence of.