Not exact matches
Fake skeptics and deniers won't do the combination of factors that I have laid out because they realize it won't give the answers that they want to
see.
The U.S. and the Saudis, to be sure, hold prominent positions, and just behind them are the rest of the usual suspects: ExxonMobil lobbyists, the American Enterprise Institute, The International Chamber of Commerce (whom journalists complain is so predictable as to be boring, and therefore useless), the
skeptics - cum - denialists, the anonymous scum who distributed counterfeit editions of NGO newsletters (they weren't, actually, very funny) and
fake - byline flyers ridiculing the third - world victims of climate change (you have to
see them to believe them).
I
see that the
fake skeptics here did nt have the sense to check the ar5 deadlines.
I never thought that I will be defending Mann — but I have to; so hopefully you can
see how ignorant the
Fake Skeptics are: LIA was colder in Europe, North America — at that same time — S / H had much» HOTTER» days = LAWS OF PHYSICS say so; Your pagan believes are giving oxygen to Mann.
But even if one believes such actions are justified in principle I don't think it is appropriate for someone in Gleick's position to do what he did because if scientists are
seen to do anything which undermines their personal integrity then it can cast doubt in the public's eye about their scientific work and that of their colleagues and makes it harder for them to counter the anti-scientific antics of the
fake skeptics, although I would hope that the stinking hypocrisy of the latter would also be apparent to the public.