Not exact matches
It's really too bad that you haven't
seen fit to give even a fraction of the attention to the very real, very serious question of who broke into the computer system and stole the emails that you have given to legitimizing the baseless, slanderous and inflammatory charges that various
fossil fuel corporation stooges made about the emails.
What that sciencey - sounding gibberish about «unproved variables» means is that you don't want to
see trillions of dollars in wealth shift from the
fossil fuel corporations to other sectors of the industrial economy, therefore, anthropogenic global warming can not be true.
Between 2007 and 2008, the International Finance
Corporation's
fossil fuel lending increased by a whopping 165 % (
see / / www.bicusa.org/en/Article.3840.aspx).
I do
see wrt to US laws, you are proposing confiscation and nationalization of resources, since many of the
fossil fuels are owned by individuals who have leased their mineral rights to
corporations.
This could be
seen as a tribute to the relative political power of the
fossil fuel industries and high - consumers of
fossil energy (large
corporations and the affluent) versus the power of the unemployed and youth; the former are treated, if at all, with gentle «nudges» while the latter are viewed as «clay to be molded» by elites.
Except of course for the
fossil fuel corporations, who will
see their hundreds of billions of dollars in profits shift to other sectors of the economy.