Sentences with phrase «see graph a»

See the graph, right.

See the graph for the most common mobile job search activities:

See the graph for the average incomes in the states with the most respondents.

We discovered that computer science trends at Stanford (see graph below) were similar to that of science and tech (see graph above).

See the graph below... are the Chinese still buying Bitcoin?

We can see the graph showing the evidence of awareness after since the demonetization came into play in November 2016.

See graph below as reported by Forbes.

Below, you can see a graph which tracks the difficulty rate of BCH:

Below you can see a graph of the number of weekly responses we receive to our token sale intake form.

You'll see a graph with a line above it on the following screen; Drag this line up or down to change the warning threshold.

Catalyst Communities Housing Association v Colemack (Brentford County Court, 7 November 2006, unreported) illustrates the problem (see graph on p 507).

My latest findings are that Q2 2012 may have been the worst quarter for partner lateral hiring (in terms of numbers of hires announced) for almost five years if one takes into account the «Dewey 20», partners from the stricken firm forced to move rapidly to new homes as the US titan sank beneath the waves of its own hubristic expansion (see graph).

Within Insights, click on posts, then «when your fans are online» to see a graph showing

Now Extended through 2022 See Graph.

So while January broke the monthly records for SE England (see graph) that stretch back to 1873, December and February with only a half - a-month of rain only appear in 11th & 2nd place respectively.

See graph below.

If the counter argument is that these changes are a response to Global Warming - it would be really good to see a graph showing what the models predicted / hindcast on average for the global cloud cover.

It would be helpful to see a graph of how the tidal amplitude varies — how much variabiligy remains outide of the spring - neap and other short - term cycles?

The reflectivity of a water surface is calculated using the Fresnel equations (see graph).

For every 100 watts these data centers consume, only 2.5 watts result in useful computing (see graph below).

See the graph on pg 25 of this file re CO2 emissions since 1860, and you'll see what I mean....

SA imported less power, and exported more power, to the other states over this period (see the graph below).

See graph 1, graph 2, graph 3, graph 4, graph 5, and graph 6.

Looking at Hansens testimony document one can see the graph showing he beautiful correlation between CO2 and temperature — albeit with a few centuries of offset.

See their graph.

Joe D'Aleo reports via email that the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) Index has gone negative for this past month, see the graph below: Source: http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/correlation/amon.us.data This is the first time the November value has been negative since about 1996.

Texas currently has more than 12,000 MW of operational utility - scale wind capacity (see graph below)-- about one - fifth of the total wind capacity in the United States.

Compared to the actual temperature rise since 1980, the average of 32 top climate models (the so - called CMIP5) overestimates it by 71 - 159 % (see graph).

The negative West Hub prices (see graph above) reflect the region's local oversupply of wind power compared to its electric demand and the inability to move the excess wind power to other areas with more demand.

See the graph «Solar and Back Radiation» in Part Two for an example.

See this graph (again).

In other words, they cherry - picked their data to invent a Hotspot — as pointed out in a subsequent publication by PJ Michaels and PC Knappenberger [see graph below]

Citation 3a) These are the official records (scroll down a little to see the graph) http://sealevel.colorado.edu/

As shown in the graph below, cosmic - ray intensity (as measured by the radioactive carbon isotope C - 14) and terrestrial climate (as measured by the oxygen isotope O - 18) correlate in amazing detail over an interval of at least 3000 years (see graph below; the bottom graph is the central section, blown up to reveal detail)

See the graph below, which shows the global tally of disaster expenses for the past 24 years.

Or see graph at

1492 was right at the end of a nasty cold period that was almost 100 years long already (see graph above) and was followed by the truly severe LIA.

The Senator does not mention what we should do to combat climate change and ocean acidification if we were to drop wind power, nor does he mention that wind power in Australia has been very effective in reducing carbon dioxide emissions intensity (see the graph on the right above).

Anyone ever see a graph of ocean temperatures alone?

http://youtu.be/3aPQqNt15-o LOD and temperatures» changes: ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/005/y2787e/ See graph on page 50, at: ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/005/y2787e/y2787e08.pdf

It drives me nuts to go see a graph and find it interesting, only to discover that the poster gives me absolutely no idea where the they got the mystery data.

[62] see the graph comparing surface radiation absorbed by the air and radiation of the air to the surface in Dr. Ferenc M. Miskolczi Physics of the planetary greenhouse effect International conference on global warming, New York, March -4, 2008.

I'm afraid all my efforts to match recorded observations to them only seem close to matching the very coldest 1990 predictions and I'd love to see a graph that can more clearly show me where I'm going wrong.

Moreover — while academic articles are not the only indicator of serious attention — the scholarly literature on climate adaptation massively outweighs that on mitigation (see graph 1).

See the graph here: The graph is from my monthly SSTa update: http://bobtisdale.wordpress.com/2014/08/11/july-2014-sea-surface-temperature-sst-anomaly-update/

I still laugh out loud every time I see a graph purporting to show the average global temperature to within a 1 / 10th of a degree for 1850.

«A picture paints...» etc. 99 % of folk will see the graph.

But in articles like «Scant Gains Made on CO2 Emissions, Energy Agency Says» by Sarah Kent in the Wall Street Journal on April 18, 2013, we see a graph with a 6 C temperature rise by 2050 — if we don't reduce «carbon intensity.»

Arctic amplification is greatest in autumn and winter (see graph below), which is why it mainly results in persistent cold weather events, Francis explains.

That's its appeal: See this graph?