Sentences with phrase «see graph here»

See the graph here: The graph is from my monthly SSTa update: http://bobtisdale.wordpress.com/2014/08/11/july-2014-sea-surface-temperature-sst-anomaly-update/

«Vegan men tended to have significantly higher testosterone levels than both vegetarians and meateaters (see graph here), which can be a risk factor for prostate cancer,»

Vegan men tended to have significantly higher testosterone levels than both vegetarians and meateaters (see graph here), which can be a risk factor for prostate cancer, the reason plant - based diets appear to reverse the progression of prostate cancer may be due to how low their IGF - 1 drops (see Cancer Reversal Through Diet?).

See the graphs here:

Not exact matches

Here is a graph of the Canadian (in red) and the U.S. (blue) employment - population ratio (for more on this see also this recent post from expat Canadian economist David Andolfatto):

Here's a graph covering few months of the relative value of bitcoins against US dollars; as you can see, there have been wild fluctuations in the value over the past two months.

(For more on compound interest, see our article and graph here.)

My post was on the «Gig Economy» and you can find it here (you have to scroll down to find it, but that gives you a chance to see some fascinating graphs first) but as I mention, wish the information we had on it was better.

Next, this is a graph of the gold price measured in silver, otherwise known as the gold to silver ratio (see here for an explanation of bid and offer prices for the ratio).

Here we can see the VXX, short term volatility graph, which spiked during the sell, off in early February but has since stabilized.

Here users can see the betting percentages at each of our contributing sportsbooks, view line graphs, value ratings, key injuries, betting systems and officials.

ENDS Download the full report here: Welsh Election Report (English language version) or here: Welsh Election Report (Welsh language version) or see summary of findings in graphs.

For more information about the Library's 2017 Budget please see: 2017 B&ECPL Adopted Budget in Brief: Resolution, Charts, & Graphs (Click Here) 2017 B&ECPL Adopted Budget Line Item Detail with Notes (Click Here)

In fact, both defense and nondefense spending will now be lifted far above what the Budget Control Act ever allowed even before sequestration kicked in, underscoring the return of Congressional preferences for spending over fiscal discipline (see graph showing nondefense spending below, and click here to see defense spending).

This split between defense and nondefense would continue over the next decade (see nondefense graph at right, and defense graph here).

(Click here to see a graph.)

And AMA and NIH data show that the demographics of physician - scientists have shifted dramatically over the past decade, with the proportion of NIH - funded principal investigators in their 60s and 70s soaring and the share under 60 declining (see graph above and slide 14 here).

«You can see here the small planets dominate the picture,» he casually said while referring to a graph depicting the different exoplanet sizes and their number as of July 2010.

I sometimes can get a grasp on how the chemistry works by reading various papers, but the graph you have here makes it much easier to see the whole picture.

What's interesting here is that this graph allows you to see what happens using a «number needed to treat» and «number needed to harm» analysis.

Pulling data from the Teacher Follow - Up Survey (see Table 1 here), he created the graph below showing changes in teacher turnover over time.

* The article featured a graph showing changes over time; I've reproduced it below with some slight modifications (click on the graph to make it bigger, or see the original version here):

You can see the little pie graphs on the image file here for a handful of my books.

By looking at the graph you can see that apart from bump here and there the number of Kindle books still grows in a linear fashion.

Check out the graphs here to see it clearly: https://edrempel.com/can-confident-stock-market/.

you can see a nice graph here of Cycle 23.

Yes, and everyone here except you looks at graphs of temperature and see an increasing trend from 1970 — 2017, and we look at temperature versus CO2 since 1900 and see a rough correlation.

Can none of you commenting here see that the two graphs are identical?

There is an upward trend starting since the late 1800s, and to see it, see graph of the 30 year running mean here

Here are the graphs showing the change, with the first published in 2011 (see the related release here, thanks to Leo Hickman of the Guardian) and the next one from late last moHere are the graphs showing the change, with the first published in 2011 (see the related release here, thanks to Leo Hickman of the Guardian) and the next one from late last mohere, thanks to Leo Hickman of the Guardian) and the next one from late last month:

This is due to an increase in the trade winds that push water westward across the tropical Pacific, while in the east cold water from the depths comes to the surface (see last graph here).

Sometimes it is a little frustrating to see the really, really, really, really dumb statements here of someone who really, really, really can't read a graph and is really, really, really, really incapable of taking in the really, really, really exceptional circumstances of 2007 and the really, really, really, really mundanely normal circumstances of 2008.

it doesn't need to involve my SAW or AHH's AGW) that doesn't admit an obvious decomposition resembling Figure 10 of my poster, and instead has a component more like D'Aleo and Easterbrook's graph at WUWT that was mentioned here earlier, this ought to be excellent grist for their mill, as well as hopefully satisfying those objecting that SAW has nothing whatsoever to do with ocean oscillations.

But if you look at the upper left graph here you'll see that his «triple - exponential» fit for the period 1960 - 2010 has an R2 of 98.98 % while what he calls my «totally inappropriate» fit based on the same two points he uses has an R2 of 99.56 %.

Looking forward to seeing what his graph here looks like when redone to take land use changes into account.

Here you will see that NOT - averaged temperature graphs has much lower values in 1980.

Here's figure 5 that tells the story: Look at graph 5c, and you'll see 20th century warmth matches peaks either side of the year...

I came across a graph on «Watts Up With That» recently implying that a 10C temperature - change would be enough to decrease the dissolved CO2 concentration by about 30 %, or 1C by 3 %, nicely correlating with my result from the equation on Wikipedia (see here: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/02/20/basic-geology-part-2-co2-in-the-atmosphere-and-ocean/)

[And in Chapter 1 of that very same report, as I listed, they go to great lengths to make sure we all know that their models predict a hot spot and it's due to «greenhouse gases» — they do so again in the IPCC AR4 report as you can see here with a very similar graph.

In other words, «we're gonna need a bigger graph» (See the old, smaller, graph here).

Yes, here we have nice one knocking graphs before even looking to see where they come from.

Dr Mann says «here's a graph... as you can see we're doomed.»

Here's a graph you've probably never seen: the correlation between use of fossil fuels and access to clean water.

From the close match to the IPCC's graph (see Figure 5, below) achieved using a normal error distribution, it is evident that the IPCC made a normality assumption, so that has also been done here.

Not so much of hiatus as progression of a quasi-periodic variability, the SST «cycles» are trailing and not leading N. Atlantic series of the events (see last graph HERE)

This correlates nicely with Jupiter - Earth - Venus syzurgies see Desmoulins graph here: http://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2010/06/14/venus-earth-jupiter-alignment-and-the-solar-cycle/ These operate on 20.8 year and 23.72 year cycles (Not far from the J - S frequencies).

The graph here is nothing new, and any fool can see how steep the slope for all the previous progressions into ice ages were....

Here's the graph of Northern Canada from the paper that Philip Clarke apparently believes shows clear evidence of anthropogenic influences (see that little uptick at the end — we did that!)

Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach [Graphs updated to include error bars] Inspired by the paper by the charmingly - named Maya Tolstoy discussed here on WUWT, I decided to see if tidal forces affect the timing of earthquakes and volcanoes.

For example see here http://wxmaps.org/pix/sa.00hr.html Temperature humidity and wind direction graph) The 0C isobar 600mb is currently reaching 20 degrees south latitude.