Sentences with phrase «see harms done to»

However, sometimes it takes a lawsuit to allow our political leaders to see harms done to protected groups.

He is grieved because we are his children and he sees the harm we do to ourselves and others.

What idiot would stick with a position after seeing the harm it does to children?

Not exact matches

Of course, fear isn't rational — you don't see people giving toaster ovens the side - eye, and many other things that people are afraid of, including public speaking and spiders, are unlikely to harm you either.

On the other hand, if you have a coworking space in the direct vicinity of WeWork or in a relatively untapped market, their marketing efforts might do you more harm than good, as we saw last year when WeWork employees started to reach out to other workspace members in the hopes of getting them to sign a lease with WeWork.

Google director of sustainable ads Scott Spencer told CNBC last week that the company doesn't «have a crypto ball to know where the future is going to go with cryptocurrencies,» but that it has «seen enough consumer harm or the potential for consumer harm that it's an area that we want to approach with extreme caution.»

In a letter to irate classmates, Zuckerberg gives his first apology to make the news: «I hope you understand, this is not how I meant for things to go, and I apologize for any harm done as a result of my neglect to consider how quickly the site would spread and its consequences thereafter... I definitely see how my intentions could be seen in the wrong light.»

Since there is no doubt that investment demand drives the price of silver, it is hard to see how producers asking the primary regulator about the unusual developments on the COMEX could possibly do any harm, but instead much potential good.

While higher prices may harm battery manufacturers (marginally), we don't see the higher prices providing leverage to miner share prices.

I see nothing wrong with a religion as long as it doesn't cause physical harm (i.e. mutilation, torture, abuse or murder etc.) to it's members or others.

I don't abuse (not intentionally, but I am blunt which can be seen as a less than stellar trait) because I don't wish to cause harm.

I see no evidence to believe what Bostontola preaches, but I can respect it because it is important to him and doesn't harm me.

If you saw a murder about to happen and could easily stop it knowing you yourself could not be harmed, but then did nothing.

It's humorous to see atheists lament «all the harm done in the name of religion», when that pales in comparison to all of the harm done by atheists.

I think when we consider the scriptures we see differing examples of Christians — the church at Corinth that Paul wrote to was doing more harm than good, the church at Antioch was doing good, the church at Ladocia was doing neither good or bad.

Lincoln overrode his order because he saw the harm it would do to the Union cause in the border regions.

I do hear your points that you think I have not seen the need for warning of danger, that you believe I think of it as «unChristian» to talk about such things, and that you may even believe that my comments are akin to protecting evil deeds and harming the innocent, using the bible as a proof texting weapon to that end and contributing to a problem of church becoming fake and shallow while claiming to be deep and pious.

Second I believe in free speech and freedom to worship as I see fit as long as I don't cause physical harm to anyone and the freedom to believe what I want to regardless of what anyone else thinks.

Many people tend to do thing that harm them (usually emotionally) and do not see the connection between their actions and the consequences.

Just because evil is always relative does not mean we as humans can not see ourselves in others and share that with them, letting them know we can relate, that we feel the relative evil as well and attempt to support those in harms way by saying «I am you too, i'm on your side.»

Religion does some good, but more often what I'm seeing is the harm it does, whether it it the Taliban or the Evangelicals, trying to force your version of god on to others is harmful.

All the «harm done by religion», pales in comparison to the true harm done by atheism and scientism... just see Mao's secular Communist revolution in China (millions of Christians killed, churches outlawed), Hitler's science / eugenics - based «building of a better man», Stalinism, Castro's Cuba, or Kim's North Korea.

We just need to get along in peace and not abuse or harm other's who do not see things as we do.

As a practicing Catholic I don't see what the harm is in allowing Muslims to recognize their religion as much as Christians do.

In the other a Furry takes your family members likeness and covers them in fluffy love, all night long until they have to wash out the sticky with a hose, see no harm done...

Of course, as our convictions persist and mature, we begin to see the ways in which we are complicit in global wealth disparity and injustice, and we begin to think more seriously about policy, about sustainability, about making more dramatic attitude and lifestyle changes, and about problems within some of our charities and justice groups that perpetuate a white savior complex, sometimes doing more harm than good.

No place in the Gospels do we see that Jesus ever laid a finger on anyone to harm them.

When we see someone else behaving in ways we don't approve of and which we think is sin (and as long as it's not illegal or harming someone), why can't «love» be the only word that comes to our mind?

The idea is absent that sexual conduct can do harm to the health of one «sspirit, of one's humanity; that it can overthrow a person's human balance, turning him or her obsessively in on self, seeing in others no more than sex - objects, incapable of any deep or lasting love or of the respect that is the very hallmark of love.

What is more evil / selfish: A person who inadvertently causes harm to many around him / her because they are so wrapped up in self they can not see / do not care about the pain they cause or someone who purposefully chooses to cause harm to one person because it brings them pleasure?

Peter responds appropriately to this news that Aslan is not a nice pet who will coddle them with purring comfort, keeping them out of harm's way: «I'm longing to see [Aslan],» said Peter, «even if I do feel frightened when it comes to the point.»

because almost every religion has some common like every one would say «do not harm ur neighbor, do not do drug and so on... this is where we have to use our brain and see which makes more sense...

It's sad to see how many atheists willingly deny the harm atheism has done to this world.

Churches involved in this kind of hands - on ministry see firsthand the power and influence of the abortion industry, and the harm it does to women, children, and communities.

He saw it as a chance to pick on someone who is obviously far more intelligent than he is and thus a turn to spew more hatred of atheists... he just keeps putting more nails in christianities proverbial coffin - no harm done to our side.

In a statement, President Barack Obama said «with this operation, the United States has once again demonstrated that we will do whatever it takes to see that justice is done when people harm Americans»...

This entails an understanding of exactly why the Magisterium is so central to the Church, why it is right to talk of «formal cooperation» with evil as always doing «irreparable harm -LSB-...] to the whole of society» and why the Catholic vision of sex, love and, so crucially, our woundedness (see Fr Cummings» article in this issue), is the right alternative to the prevailing hedonistic humanism.

Seeing as we were in chocolate mode, I didn't think it could harm to add a little more... and so these Raw Triple Chocolate Cookies were born!

«We are also seeing a growing number of retailers and growers seeking to use a more sustainable type of packaging that is 100 % biodegradable and does not harm the planet.»

Also, there seem to be a few «normal» spiders hiding in my plants... they don't seem to harm the plants, so could they be one reason that I haven't seen spider mites for a while?

goodness i can't believe it people will still defend him.You know something when Giroud misses many chances like at Monaco i did not criticize him even based on that you know why?its because he has always not been clinical.The only way a team can improve is by indentifying its problems and solving them.Arsenal has Giroud as the main cf and Welbeck as backup to him.Giroud has done well scoring some goals some too important but collectively he does more harm than good.Do not use moments to judge a player judge him based on content.Giroud does not excel in many games than he excels in games.As a main cf you need to be consistent.I see people here saying Giroud can not dribble he cant do this he cant do that but its a bit crazy to criticize him for that because every player has his own style.Giroud limitations as a player costs arsenal and will cost us a lot.Most importantly his poor finishing which has cost us several times.Not good enough.His style of play is ok for us but a striker who can take on players and run behind defences very well would make us very strong and also should be clinical.For Welbeck he needs to works on his finishing and composure by doing the basic things right.He rushes infront of goal too much.For now he is just above average.However he can excel if he works on improving.Giroud and Welbeck will always be a pain in arsenal's neck for most part.Some will call me stupid but hey at least i want to analyze the problem.People may support Giroud or Welbeck to lead the line next season but as the saying goes if you fool me once shame on you but if you fool me twice shame on me.Will you let Giroud and Welbeck fool you again?

we have no cover for CB at all then, Chambers needs to sit on the bench and be healthy for covering RB and CB as much as i want to see what hes like as a DM its too high of a risk to play him there atm, I'd def go for bellerin for RB though hes so fast and has tremendous technical ability, One person i think wenger should of taken to dortmund is diaby just incase hes needed would be nice for diaby to get a good 60 min game but i do nt think hes ready for CL just yet since he hasnt even featured in the PL yet but then again no harm in taking him since hes been linking up with bellerin pretty well in the U21's we must remember we have some really good youngsters in the squad than can fill in some of the spaces.

do nt be surprised if we see song back on a loan would be the easiest midfield option to get at short notice just to get him on loan for a season just to fill the gap i think wenger likes familiarity with some players knowing the arsenal way would be an ok squad filler in case we have injury pile up at Christmas or new year period as you would expect would be an upgrade on kim kalstrom i think anyways and being at barca cant have done his skill set any harm maybe he learn to more defensive responsibility

He would have done his chances no harm on Sunday as he danced his way through the Real Madrid defence with some brilliant footwork, as seen in the clip below, before putting it on a plate for Jessie Lingard to open the scoring.

We have to get access for our medical staff to the MRI scan to see what grade it is, how bad it is and make absolutely sure they don't make any suicidal decision that could harm his future for two or three months.

The Gunners are seen as outsiders for the title by 888sport, but they have done no harm to their chances whatsoever with the signing # 46 million striker Alexandre Lacazette.

Whether or not rotation harms their chances of doing so remains to be seen, but with such a big squad at his disposal and with numerous players on the fringes waiting for a chance to impress, it would seemingly make sense for Mourinho to bring Schneiderlin and Martial back into the frame providing that they're deemed fit enough to start.

Glad to see Gabriel kept in there a clean sheet will do him no harm.

* the actual quote is «Yes I do (expect to sign a defender before the season starts)» ** See the self - harm I commit in the name of getting you stories?

I have no problem with saying «I don't feel comfortable with CIO because it doesn't feel right to me», «it breaks my heart to see my baby crying», «it didn't work for us so we tried something else» but to imply that other people who do choose to use a method that is and has been endorsed by major medical groups are harming their children is kinda a jerk thing to do.