Sentences with phrase «see him playing against»

I saw him play against spu I could have sworn, he was outstanding I remember him bullying a player off the ball letting it go out for a goal kick even though he is slim and not tallest.

It would be a good test to see him play against OHL and WHL competition.

Its better to have him or we will see him playing against us.

Will need to see them play against better competition (I mean, our April schedule has been tilted towards playing the dregs of the league), but good teams beat the teams they're supposed to beat.

You see it playing against them, and then you see it on TV.

I promise you, you will swallow your words if you see him playing against us.

You must have seen him played against Arsenal.

Are City not far and away the best team we'll have seen him play against?

Saw him played against Barcelona.

Moreso than any other team, we can't know how good PSG is until we see them play against another top continental side.

Apparently there were offers from Premier League clubs, including Tottenham but, such was Hernandez's love for United, he couldn't see himself playing against them in the same league.

We failed to win any of the first 15 league games I saw us play against them and when we did finally beat them in April 1995 it was our first success since 1953.

I've also seen them play against Maccabi Haifa, where they came from 2 - 0 down to draw 2 - 2.

«When we played at home to Swansea this season who on that showing was probably the worst Premier League team ive seen us play against I didn't see you questioning high ratings based on the fact we were up against a hopeless team.

While I can understand why people do nt like Michael Cera, I thought he did very well in the role and I was glad to see him playing against type, since movies like Youth In Revolt have shown that Cera is more than capable of playing characters other than the stereotypical nerdy, awkward guy.

It's also fun to see him play against Gosling again (hooray CRAZY STUPID LOVE reunion!).

Jude Law has always been one of my favorite actors, so it's great to see him playing against type here as the larger - than - life criminal, much in the same way that Pierce Brosnan shocked audiences in «The Matador.»

Not exact matches

If anything, they see the current upheaval being about cutthroat competition that will hasten the onset of «grid parity» — the day when solar can compete on a level playing field against other energy sources.

In the article, the MSM propagandist states such things as: 2017 has seen, according to his one time Goldman Sachs source, a «dramatic crash in [physical gold coin] demand,» that interest in gold coins is linked to «political conservatism, or anarcho - libertarianism» and «end of the world right wing sentiments,» that gold has been implicated in a «conspiracy to commit money laundering,» that gold is «financed by people in the narcotics trade,» that it comes from «illegal mines and drug dealers in Peru, Bolivia and Ecuador,» that «the federal authorities assume the NTR Metals [case] represented only a fraction of illegally sourced and financed gold,» that therefore the US attorney is broadly investigating the gold industry, that gold is «produced by exploited workers,» that «crude [gold] extraction techniques create serious and lasting environmental damage,» that gold plays an important part in «tax evasion,» that it is related to American gun sales, which the author abhors; that «drug dealers [use] gold imports as a way of laundering their proceeds,» and that «they came to realize that illegal gold [is] an intrinsically better business» than drug dealing; to name but a few of the aspersions cast against gold in the short article.

Since his election, Trump's pushback against Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis on expanding the Afghanistan troop presence (which Trump backed down on) and his promises to bring back 2,000 Americans in Syria «very, very soon» (let's see) play strongly with his base.

NOW YOU KNOW WHAT ORWELLIAN UNITED STATES CONGRESS (USSR # 2 which consists of lawyers or what are liars, physicians / doctors and family members of effected individuals who suffered some sort of brain desease etc.... lawyers, so crime per physicians OR WHAT IS HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION can get away with it) AND OTHER GOVERNMENTS WORLDWIDE ARE SOOO BUSY WITH WHEN PLAYING / CLOWNING (acting) IN FRONT OF CAMERAS ONLY HOW SOMETHING HAVE TO BE DONE (deliberately omitting / delaying facts of genocide as seen on this complain)... NO DIFFERENT FROM ROMNEY WHOSE FATHER EXCELLED AFTER GM WAS DELIBERATELY SCREWED / BANKRUPT LIKE AMERICA TODAY (soon to be success based on deliberate sabotage which is nothing else than grand treason / betrayal with acts of genocide against targeted white population)!!!

If there is a God and there is just as much for as against, But lets say there is a God and he made everything Including you and He gets to make the rules because lets face it hes a lot bigger then you, So unfortunately he only wants those who believe in him based on the information given, Lets look at the facts based on the Book,, Some of his own angels turned on him and they see him every day... That had to hurt, So he decides With man he only wants those with the faith to believe based on His book and faith found thru the holy spirit, If you refuse to believe then he cant use you, cant trust you, so he will choose to toss you aside, Hey I understand It ai nt fair, Your important, Your Smart, But unfortunately hes bigger then you and he has the Juice, You either play by the rules or wait and see what not believing leads too.

Then Aquinas borrows Jerome's harsh words against those who pursue frivolous knowledge, thereby neglecting their duties: «We see priests forsaking the gospels and the prophets, reading stage - plays, and singing the love songs of pastoral idylls.»

Once again we see the curious way in which the two religion clauses, intended to be mutually supportive, are played against each other.

Seen against the background of the life - long process of parenting (one is always a parent after the process is begun), intercourse plays a tiny role.

The emotion was partly frustration at the sight of young men caught up in futile studies: «Part of my cross, indeed its heaviest portion, is that I have to see friars born with the highest gifts for fine studies spending their lives and wasting their energies in such play - acting... All my files are filled with material against these books which I consider absolutely useless.

Coming up against Arsenal, it would be a no brainer to see the visitors have large spells of possession and nullify whatever little threat the home side may pose; but Johnson, playing as the Right - Winger, could initiate counterattacks with his deceptive pace and has the ability to deliver that final ball for the likes of Steven Fletcher and Conor Wickham — who could start upfront for the Black Cats against Arsenal, to finish off a goal scoring chance.

SEE MORE Best 100 Footballers 2014 (numbers 70 to 41)-- Arsenal's Ozil And Manchester United Quartet Among Surprise Inclusions Arsenal Star Claims Gunners Didn't Play Their Own Game Against Liverpool How Arsenal Fans Hope Their XI Will Look Post-January Transfer Window, With # 26m Barcelona Star & # 20m Liverpool Target

I hope to see our players making amends and scoring a couple of goals when playing against Dinamo at Home.

Great hire by Chris Ballard, and I am looking forward to seeing those multiple formations / personnel groupings that defences hate to play against.

Their goal while against run of play and an own goal was good goal because the midfielder did well to see a better opportunity and passed the ball.

I'm all for a little positive boost particularly on the part of ramsey's recovery but... based on recent form and particularly against more physical opponents, I seriously wouldn't wan na see ozil play ahead of cazorla or rosicky for this important fixture

The Spaniard simply does not seem to have the legs as we saw in the game against Boro and I feel Kieran would be better suited to play at wing - back as pace will be crucial in dealing with the likes of Sane and De Bruyne.

I don't think I've ever seen him play well against decent opposition.

In a way I hope the young striker does get another chance to play against West Brom because we have seen signs of some real talent and the more he plays the more comfortable he will feel in the side and the better he should perform.

What I see is we won against Chelsea at Wembley where teams dream to play football and we beat chel $ hit

I have never seen cazorla play before his debut against sunderland and the rest is history.

I wan na see Lucas play against these teams!

The Seminoles closed out Oklahoma State despite sloppiness in Arlington, while Wake Forest has one of the worst offensive lines you will see in Division I, gaining fewer than two yards - per - play against ULM.

I'm still not convinced about Debuchy playing tonight, He has been a liability so far this season and I can't see that changing against one of Europe's finest!

In a very real sense, sending this team to Santiago was an insult not only to the host nation of Chile but to all who expected to see and play against our best.

Yes he was good against Swansea but we all saw how Gibbs in his place became a super sub against the spuds... Let nobody tell me Debuchy was not playing well hence his performance.

Besides if you and I can see that Arsenal struggle against teams who play a pressing game, surely any experienced manager with the players capable of carrying out the tactics would just use that on Arsenal as Dortmund did

i have been saying this for along time arsenal would be better surve with a defrent stile of play maker one who can shoot head the ball take on defender dribble into space.we all see it over on over again you don't need one killers pass to win game alot of team don't have ozil on create lots of chance against us.

I would love to see Arsenal get strong and overly physical against a liv side, they are like us they prefer an open game, I'd love to see us keep organised go strong at them and let the forwards play.

See the front 3 against Watford compared to what we played at Merseyside.

We saw how dull our play was against N'castle without him.

Now he won't play against Man U and without him i really can't see us winning that game.

If he joins another team and plays right wing against us does anybody see him getting past Kolasinac?

Why is Xhaka still in your lineup?He's massively overrated and I'm not even basing it on this one game.I also predicted he'll be overrun in midfield if played today.People should stop criticizing him.It's Wenger's fault he was played when clearly knowing his weaknesses.I warned against this yesterday.I knew he was going to be overrun.It is highly debatable if he was the kind of player we needed in the first place.It's funny how people think Wilshere is done yet apart from passing I can't see which area of football he beats Wilshere.Even Wilshere has a higher IQ.