Sentences with phrase «see if this is possible in»

You should check with your fund to see if this is possible in your circumstances.

Not exact matches

Some researchers also think it may be possible to compare the carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and other chemicals in a plume to «default» levels seen in asteroids, which were formed at the dawn of the solar system — and ask if life is manipulating the chemistry there, or at least did so in the past.

But if it's longer than that — which does look possible — we're going to see a significant rise in the price of crude oil, and in the price of refined products, especially in Western Canada.»

It'll be interesting to see — it's possible that pro sports matches may speed up as a result, if all that built - in ad time gets cut out.

At the Code Conference in May, Oculus CEO Brendan Iribe said making it possible for users to see their own limbs was an important hurdle for VR to clear if it's to become a mass technology.

If we see capital in this light, our most essential task is to reduce the burn to a simmer and buy as much time as possible.

That is defensible only if one is certain that the baseline level of possible robotic error in civilian protection exceeds that baseline level of human error... I, for one, would not bet against the possibility that for some military applications, we will some day come to see mere human judgment as guaranteeing an unacceptable level of indiscriminate and disproportionate violence.

«If investors do not see an improvement in credit growth near - term, a soft patch in growth is possible as firms are stuck in a wait and see mode amidst heightened uncertainty,» the UBS note concludes.

«It's very important in blockchain technology and specifically cryptocurrencies that you be very open with what you're trying to do and have as many people as possible looking at it to see if they can find a flaw,» he said.

If you want to see the deals I'm investing in, and possible join us in funding these companies, you can signup to get my deal memos.

At the end of the day, you get out what you put in — and if you're spending at least 20 days at the barre this month, I'm guessing you'll want to see your BEST results possible.

If the global economy were to recover much more quickly than most of us expect, and, much more importantly, if Beijing were to initiate a far more aggressive program of privatization and wealth transfer than I think politically possible, perhaps transferring in the first few years the equivalent of as much as 2 - 5 % of GDP, the surge in household income could unleash much stronger consumption growth than we have seen in the pasIf the global economy were to recover much more quickly than most of us expect, and, much more importantly, if Beijing were to initiate a far more aggressive program of privatization and wealth transfer than I think politically possible, perhaps transferring in the first few years the equivalent of as much as 2 - 5 % of GDP, the surge in household income could unleash much stronger consumption growth than we have seen in the pasif Beijing were to initiate a far more aggressive program of privatization and wealth transfer than I think politically possible, perhaps transferring in the first few years the equivalent of as much as 2 - 5 % of GDP, the surge in household income could unleash much stronger consumption growth than we have seen in the past.

The results I am seeing from J.M Smucker, in conjunction with the benefits of tax reform, the stock is becoming very compelling at present levels, although I would like to acquire it cheaper if possible.

A sudden stop can occur if at some point China becomes dependent on external debt to fund growth (which isn't the case now, but is worth watching out for) or if credibility collapses and we see a run on the banking system (which is possible, but, in my opinion, still unlikely).

If we see more persistence in this action, without further deterioration in corporate bonds, it's possible that we could move off of a Crash Warning to a still - negative but less dramatic set of conditions.

Though we don't see that evidence yet, and continued economic and valuation risks are likely to keep us hedged with put option coverage in any event, it's possible that we could cover a portion of our short call option hedges if we do see some firming of internals.

Once the benefits of trading and investing in digitized gold become apparent, it's possible the world could see a shift towards tracking the provenance of gold on the blockchain, if not fully digitizing gold reserves.

This means it is possible for you to see your site make small PageRank shifts relative to other sites in your category, particularly if there are a number of sites listed on your category page.

Nonetheless, with approximately 15 % of shareholders opposing Mr. Arnault's remuneration at Louis Vuitton's AGM in April, it remains to be seen if the heady perfume of strong TSR performance is sufficient to throw shareholders off the scent of a possible clash with Dior's board at the upcoming AGM.

WWJD tell me: if GOD decides with the infinite power wand, to turn atheists at the last possible moment in time into Christians, and you do not get to see them burn forever in your greatest place of suffering, and instead they get a front seat at the table, how bitter and betrayed are you going to be?

If you try to «trace» one in two dimensions you'll get a circle, unless you're accounting for quantum fluctuations, and then we'd really need to go back and look at the three - dimensional possibilities to see what two - dimensional tracings would be possible.

For me I see evolution the same as you see God not enough proof to say I believe it and see God as how all things started, in my view evolution of man can be true just that it has not been proven where God I can see because there is no other logical explanation for how the matter in the universe came to be from nothing, a higher power for now can be the only possible answer if science was to prove the creation of the universe in some other way I would not deny that truth.

We fail to see that even if we have all the information in the world, it's possible we still may not know anything.

As we saw in the last chapter, popular poetry juxtaposes Christian language with contemporary analogues and contrasts and does thereby achieve a kind of ironic distance from that language; but direct contact with traditional language and symbols — what Donne, Herbert, and Hopkins achieved — is not easy, if it is even possible in our time.

Then there are some who say that God, in His infinite foreknowledge, looks into the possible futures of a person's life to see what that person would have done if they had heard the Gospel.

Firstly, it must be remembered, that he disclaims very early in the book that he can only speak for the mainline denominations with which he is familiar, and although my memory may fail me, he implies that he can only speak for his observations of the churches / leaders with whom he is familiar, and also that he may be wrong, and also, that he is only pointing out what he calls a possible cause for the problems he has seen, and hopes that his suggestions / ideas, will be considered, researched, etc, and that time will tell if his thesis bears any truth or not.

If Cain could abandon his false notion of a capricious God, he could see himself and God in truer ways: himself as a fratricide who, realizing his crime, may be able at last to learn responsibility; God as the generous fount that makes possible the perspective of Abel.

And if logical coherence in the world (e.g., pleasure requires pain) is a good itself, then free will and logical coherence can legitimately create the world you see, while also showing it to be the «best» world possible.

In the next post, «How to Get Into Narnia» we'll look at possible doorways to Lewis» other dimension (s) and see if they give us further clues about where Narnia might lie.

The understanding of historical judgment as positive in divine purpose may well be already implicit in Amos (see 4:6 - 11 and the discussion above) But still in the eighth century, it is most warmly expounded in Hosea (see especially 2:14 - 23; 5:15; 11:11) It is a pervasive if often only implicit element in the utterances of Jeremiah and makes possible that stunning declaration of a new covenant with Israel «after those days» of judgment:

If there are, say, ten possible results, God sees them all and sees them in their priority from most beneficial to least beneficial for us.

For the natural mail, who sees his world in terms only of secular events, such a double image is unnecessary even if possible.

If you were trying to cram as many people as possible into the house in order to hear and see Jesus, would you have them stand, or have them sit?

But if it is to be possible to give a dialectical answer affirming that man is «original» and «underivative», and yet that he is also a component in a cosmic history and consequently also has an origin within the world as a whole, then spirit and matter can not be envisaged merely as disparate entities and seen as purely and simply different.

in knowing that one know longer has to justify ones self or fear the judgement of anyone else that if God is for you who can be against you, So we are safe to say that since we have all fallen short of the glory of God meaning nobodys perfect Jesus made it possible for us to be seen as perfect in His sight.

If the total coincidence of transcendence and immanence is vision, and not structure of existence, then the traditional styles of faith and practices of faith may still have possible meaning, even though they are seen to be penultimate; and then the radical theologian can be understood as standing in a spectrum of theological positions and not in isolation.

But if talking apes looks anything like what we've seen in the movies then we are fine with this scientific development taking as long as possible.

It is a serious thing to live in a society of possible gods and goddesses, to remember that the dullest most uninteresting person you can talk to may one day be a creature which, if you saw it now, you would be strongly tempted to worship, or else a horror and a corruption such as you now meet, if at all, only in a nightmare.

If the ultimate gift of God is charity, as stated in the Bible, and those who gain this gift will gain eternal life, it is hard to see how anyone could rationalize that it is possible to mix these two philosphies and still gain eternal life.

This is especially true if they are seen in the setting of a dynamic process of dialogue and reception in which others are taken seriously as partners and their concerns are regarded as possible enrichments of one's own tradition.

If we read Hegel in this less dogmatic, less idealist fashion, it becomes possible to see how he might be susceptible of a revolutionary interpretation.

In sum, in the argument that a PVS patient ought to be sustained as long as possible I see the unhappy fruits of the three technological seductions I described above: death by «starvation» has now become our fault, not nature's, if we omit treatment; the distinction between omission and commission is erased in the insistence that the stopping of artificial feeding is the same as killing the patient and, as too often happens, a new technology gets legitimated and routinized by an invocation of the sanctity of lifIn sum, in the argument that a PVS patient ought to be sustained as long as possible I see the unhappy fruits of the three technological seductions I described above: death by «starvation» has now become our fault, not nature's, if we omit treatment; the distinction between omission and commission is erased in the insistence that the stopping of artificial feeding is the same as killing the patient and, as too often happens, a new technology gets legitimated and routinized by an invocation of the sanctity of lifin the argument that a PVS patient ought to be sustained as long as possible I see the unhappy fruits of the three technological seductions I described above: death by «starvation» has now become our fault, not nature's, if we omit treatment; the distinction between omission and commission is erased in the insistence that the stopping of artificial feeding is the same as killing the patient and, as too often happens, a new technology gets legitimated and routinized by an invocation of the sanctity of lifin the insistence that the stopping of artificial feeding is the same as killing the patient and, as too often happens, a new technology gets legitimated and routinized by an invocation of the sanctity of life.

Private ownership and private profit are so deeply embedded in both our Christian and our democratic heritage that few would wish to see them eradicated if this were possible.

So I asked myself: Even if I can't see it yet, is it possible that the God in my life and the God in my heart is One?

If we look at the words of Jesus of Nazareth as we have them in the first three Gospels we can see that (with the possible exception of being the Messiah) Jesus does not ask us to believe a single one of these.

If my own experience is anything to go by, by bringing him up a Catholic I may be condemning him to fights in the playground, bullying in the classroom, being endlessly baited at parties / lectures / social gatherings [always by self - professed open - minded liberals] and to seeing his faith lied about and depicted in wholly negative terms by every possible media outlet.

In recent years we have learned from the depth psychologists how important it is that we shall both recognize and say what we know about ourselves; and that we be helped, by analysis if that is necessary, to penetrate as deeply as possible into our own past, so that we can both see and say these things.

And if he is indeed, what the Christian believes him to be, a loving as well as a living God, then it is obvious that he can not be seen in abstraction from the world which he loves; for love signifies relationship, and the richest perfection possible is perfection in relationships and not «absolute power» or unchanging substance.

This same point can be put in terms of possible spin - measurements: If the three classes of spin measurements A», C», and D' are all performed, then (a) the average of the spin - value products formed from sets of spin - values A and C will equal negative one -LRB--1.0) and (b) the average of the spin - value products formed from sets A and D will equal to zero (see the discussion near the end of part I).

If you see this growth in your life, don't you want it to be shared with as many people as possible the world over?