Sentences with phrase «see in scripture»

In addition, the Dead Sea Scrolls provide proof that the words we see in Scripture today are the same words written in the Bible thousands of years ago.

Lewis wrote, He's either a lunatic for making such outrageous claims, yet every other thing about his life was very sane.In addition, the Dead Sea Scrolls provide proof that the words we see in Scripture today are the same words written in the Bible thousands of years ago.God spoke through His people to write the Bible and it's still changing lives every single day for those who meditate on it.

So according to what I see in Scripture, one should minister locally (whether you're paid because you live of the Gospel [which you and I know that it's scriptural] or unpaid [as one that exercises their spiritual gifts -LSB--RRB- and be held accountable?

Because the God I see in Scripture is not wrathful, petty or vengeful.

Yuri Wijting, I am actually only trying to state what I see in Scripture.

I'm one of those grace - believers who also disagrees since I just don't see it in Scripture (see my above link as to why), but we're all allowed our own views.

I think that the picture that we see in Scripture shows a civil authority that is disconnected from the believer, as most if not all forms of government ould have been at the time.

What we see in scripture are people like John the Baptist preaching «Repent!

If I could see in scripture the evidence for a hell of everlasting torment then so be it but not only do I not see it but I do see overwhelming scriptural evidence that the fate of the wicked is death.

As a transgender person of faith, his greatest passion is helping other trans and gender - non-conforming people see themselves in scripture, and to walk with them in their journey towards wholeness.

To see in scripture that I was not alone and unique to theses things and to talk to God about it and trust that He would be the One to ultimately help me.

This is what we see in Scripture.

First, we see in Scripture particular people and communities that represent times and places very different from our own.

It does not take much interaction with lay readers to see how enormously different are the problems they see in Scripture from those theologians are taught to see.

Single, married, divorced, young, old, SAHM, working outside of the home with kids - we should be leveraging the gift of a multigenerational Church and the examples we see in scripture to see what we are doing aligns with what women have been doing all through history.

You also see in Scripture that when people encounter Jesus, they don't all walk away to pursue the exact same lifestyle.

I believe from what I see in scripture that God most often allows a natural disaster to occur rather than directly sending one.

From what I see in scripture Hell was never created for us but for Lucifer, and through disobedience we (through Adam) doomed ourselves to Hell.

«In particular, those who saw in Scripture a sanction for slavery were both more insistent on pointing to the passages that seemed so transparently to support their position and more confident in decrying the wanton disregard for divine revelation that seemed so willfully to dismiss biblical truths.»

Although we have been really invigorated by refreshing or learning for the first time some of what has been seen in scripture, we still come up against the limitations of our thinking and the lack of lots of explanation which God has not revealed (as per Job).

Although he did not exercise it fully and showed through His submission His obedience to the Father as you see in the scriptures, he claimed oneness with God and even stated «Before Abraham was, I AM» which the Jews considered blasphemy as that is how God stated who he was to Moses.

I see in the scriptures that the Lord intends to somehow dramatically intervene in history and radically reshape the world, but in the mean time it is clear that the Gospel calls us to live and work in the world in preparation for that day.

I think what we see in the scriptures is that Jesus invites ALL to follow him but that there is a cost associated with this and that is nothing less than coming inline with the way of Jesus.

This is his plan (the Jews, then the Gentiles), but, as seen in scripture, when we pursue God he sometimes does «change his mind» toward us... but he does NOT change his «theology», mindset, or nature!

Marriage is the first social human institution seen in Scripture, as Adam and Eve serve as the paradigm for future communions joined in God's sight, to love one another and be unified physically and spiritually, leaving their parents and joining together.

Not exact matches

«I don't know how many times I've seen the most cluttered resumes... written in seven - point font, no margins, and it's like, «This is scripture,»» says Chu.

In these moments of heartache and darkness, we hold on to God's word in Scripture: «I have heard your prayer and seen your tears, I will heal you.&raquIn these moments of heartache and darkness, we hold on to God's word in Scripture: «I have heard your prayer and seen your tears, I will heal you.&raquin Scripture: «I have heard your prayer and seen your tears, I will heal you.»

Instead, being exclusive and prideful does hurt others... so I see closed - minded, exclusive theology as sinful, not gay marriage... and I think Scripture, especially the teachings of Christ, is in that same spirit.

They usually are experienced and well - versed in scripture (surveys show they know the bible better than believers) but they have opened their eyes wide enough to see through it all.

But even the most orthodox of Jews will admit that GeHenna (named after the dump outside Jerusalem that existed in the Valley of Hinnom and whilch was considered the most unclean of places, where the «fires never went out» and the «worm never died»... a reference seen in Isaiah...) was an idea adapted from Babylonian theology (taken from Zoasterism), not an idea originally developed in the Tanach (thus you will find references to «the world to come» and «tikkun Olam» only in the Talmud, not in the Tanach... which for Jews is not a problem since our view of «scripture» is not the same as a Christians).

If you really go down the list looking at every word and the heart behind it in light of scripture and in the light of the law of the Spirit of life you'll find major discrepancies and see how carnal, worldly and unbiblical those points of views really are... I'm concerned about the heart behind such views because it isn't one of a disciple (one who emulates their rabbi and is possessed by the «Holy» Spirit of God).

We seen clearly in scripture that His love is not expressed by giving people resources or eliminating day to day problems or health problems from their life.

In this way, Scripture seems to precede the Church, and the Church seems to be constituted in response to the revelation of the Son of God, a revelation who was seen as the Son of God and not as anyone else because he was according to the ScriptureIn this way, Scripture seems to precede the Church, and the Church seems to be constituted in response to the revelation of the Son of God, a revelation who was seen as the Son of God and not as anyone else because he was according to the Scripturein response to the revelation of the Son of God, a revelation who was seen as the Son of God and not as anyone else because he was according to the Scriptures.

On Luther's side, the final break with the Church authorities came in the wake of Leo X's bull of November 1518; in that document, as Luther saw it, Leo arrogated to himself the power of defining Church teaching without accountability to Scripture, the Fathers, or the ancient canons.

If someone reads religious scripture and is inspired to love others selflessly (like we see happening in this very article), that is fine with me.

In acknowledging Scripture as the normative rule, I can't see how we avoid giving it ontological priority, even if our epistemic access to its rule happens primarily within the context of the worshipping people of God.

The main problem I see with your assessment Daniel is that it completely ignores the context in which these scriptures were written.

edition; and when all these are consulted, the reader will see how little dependence can be placed on the most learned conjectures relative to these and the other animals mentioned in Scripture.

I would like you to read the Scriptures I posted for you and tell me if they did speak to you, and what meaning did you see in them?

What I was trying to say was that, in my opinion, most churchgoers are like Pharisees in that they don't see their own need for cleansing (because they persist in thinking they are already clean) OR fall into a second category of being denominationally competitve (not unlike the Paul - Apollos - Cephas leader / hero worship mentioned in Scripture.)

Since Jesus Christ did not lie to the Apostles and His Church is still standing after 2000 years it is very simple to see who has the proper interpretation of the Bible... the Church that compiled the Bible... collecting the inspired scripture from amongst many scriptures and placing the Books in the Bible.

This photo and message put to mind the many preachers I have seen who hold their huge, cross-reference, page - tabbed Bibles out in front of them and wave it around, claiming this scripture says this and that scripture says that, either taking things too literally or teaching incorrectly due to mistranslations.

When we see things not as we read in the word of God, we are to approach leadership, and show them Matthew 18:15 - 17 or whatever Scripture we know is appropriate.

Maybe I should add that the fact we see so much negativity against Christianity is in no small way due to the widespread misrepresentation and philosophising of the Scriptures far above what was written and what was understood by the original recipients.

I gradually began to see that Christianity is not about solitary seekers after truth who just get together once in a while for a chat: other people are very much part of the divine scheme of things — even scripture has come down to us through the agency of other people.

24 So they said to one another, «Let's not tear it, but cast lots for it to see whose it will be,» in order that the passage of scripture might be fulfilled [that says]: «They divided my garments among them, and for my vesture they cast lots.»

Understanding scripture is not a matter of properly defining a few difficult, multi-syllabic words, as Calvinism insists, but seeing the simple message told in the heart - wrenching stories.

From Agnostic to Islam and I have seen examples in the past... so my humble request to you is not to stop... keep learning or studying the new stuffs... an advice to you when you decide to study or learn about Islam — do not point to the people who does wrong things as wrong doing people are there in everywhere regardless of faith, but look into the scripture and go to someone who has knowledge if you have any question that bothers you but make sure that person is well educated to his community... i ask The Almighty God to open your heart...

I see that hand in Scripture, and also in many other things (including other writing).

In addition, they are going to see things from their perspective in the Scriptures that as Westerners we haven't seen — we must be ready to learIn addition, they are going to see things from their perspective in the Scriptures that as Westerners we haven't seen — we must be ready to learin the Scriptures that as Westerners we haven't seen — we must be ready to learn.