«There will be incremental changes in the next 5 or 10 years, but that might not compare to what we're going to
see in a matter of decades.
Not exact matches
A mix
of outrageous money related anxiety, broken neighborhood frameworks and an intense review administration that can come to oversimplified judgments implies that a specialist or medical attendant who had been secure
in their clinical part and spent maybe three
decades fabricating their great name can
see it pulled down
in a
matter of months.
A mix
of outrageous money related anxiety, useless neighborhood frameworks and an intense review administration that can come to oversimplified judgments implies that a specialist or medical caretaker who had been secure
in their clinical part and spent maybe three
decades constructing their great name can
see it pulled down
in a
matter of months.
The improvements
of Carling Cups, FA cups and Emirates Cups are enough for some but
in the league where it
matters we have been off the pace by 10 - 15 points for a
decade now and i have
seen no improvements there.
I think its time to do something about this, over the 2 legs, ireland were clearly the better side, that notwithstanding this particular french team is the worst i've
seen in decades, and they have no bussines going to the world cup.It is time for replays to be reviewed
in some cases and goaline technology to be applied
in other cases, i think we human being have come
of age to realise that we humans are not perfect, no
matter how hard we try, so for sepp blatter to keep resisting replays and goal line technology is quite baffling to me, i can't really understand why 3 socalled officials could make a decision, a decision
in which the whole world
saw to be a foul, and its allowed to stand, and a nation is left, heartbroken, cheated and bitter, i am an african, but as a fan
of football, i felt terrible
seeing this, and i beg the question, if someone other than the team is not benefiting from this, why can't the officials be allowed to take a look at the replays
in order to officiate the game better?
Though the issue is not necessarily a fiscal
matter for the state's financial plan, Cuomo's decision to include it
in the budget provides negotiating leverage for supporters
of the issue as they've not
seen over the past
decade.
But that hardly
matters; because after so many films these faces become embedded
in a world we have
seen unfold across a
decade's worth
of cinema.
Over the last
decade, research has increasingly suggested what many
of us have
seen first - hand
in schools across our country: principals
matter and they have a significant impact on student achievement.
People who have
decades of experience as investors have
seen times when the ability to generate new cash dries up
in a
matter of days, and when people seem to have wealth but can't generate any new cash.
In its «Here Are the Absolute Worst Artworks We Saw Around the World in 2017» roundup, ArtNet's Rachel Corbett singled out Richard Kern's photos of waiflike girls bent over stairs and / or smoking joints — subject matter he's been exploring for the better part of three decade
In its «Here Are the Absolute Worst Artworks We
Saw Around the World
in 2017» roundup, ArtNet's Rachel Corbett singled out Richard Kern's photos of waiflike girls bent over stairs and / or smoking joints — subject matter he's been exploring for the better part of three decade
in 2017» roundup, ArtNet's Rachel Corbett singled out Richard Kern's photos
of waiflike girls bent over stairs and / or smoking joints — subject
matter he's been exploring for the better part
of three
decades.
But when that reality is combined with China's (and India's) prime imperative
of sustaining growth, and with projections showing that nearly all
of the growth
in emissions
of CO2
in the next couple
of decades is coming
in fast - emerging developing countries, it's hard to
see your prescription having any impact where it
matters —
in the atmosphere.
Why the quote marks on «research» when the mere history
of the
matter is that Reynolds gave Rockefeller University five million a year for a
decade to spend on medical research as it
saw fit, with its retired former president, who raised the funds, chairing the research committee, and receiving an honorarium for his work
in retirement - he was born
in 1911.
... that means no
matter what you've written
in the rest
of that report, what people will
see and take away from your report is that global surface temperatures warmed for a couple
of decades, starting around the mid-1970s.
To point out just a couple
of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I
see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but
in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that
in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but,
in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part
in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured
in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity
in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU
of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase
in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live
in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some
decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI
in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but,
in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part
of larger hurban areas (at least
in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough
in my opinion to get a full view
of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many
matters are due to UHI instead
of GW, maybe even that a small part
of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).
Already
in Part 2 we
see that climate temperature changes
of 2 °C over a
matter of decades were nothing unusual — and were all owing to natural factors that scientists today refuse to acknowledge are
in play.
«With some level
of warming and sea level rise already
in the pipeline no
matter what we do, we won't
see a reduction
in impacts or even a sudden levelling - off — impacts are projected to increase at the same rate
in all scenarios for the next couple
of decades or so, and after that they merely increase more slowly
in the deep emissions cuts scenarios,» Betts told Mongabay.