Sentences with phrase «see in the climate»

A kind of thing we see in climate change and other environmental issues.

There is a huge offset between aerosols and CO2 sensitivity, as can be seen in Climate sensitivity and aerosol forcings.

Is it seen in climate?

And yet, in his zeal to highlight errors in thought and overstatement, he falls into precisely the same well worn ruts we see in the climate area.

The dominant view, even then, was that increasing levels of greenhouse gases were likely to dominate any changes we might see in climate on human time scales.

Is this another variant on the «blah, blah, blah, bang» dynamic that some also see in the climate debate?

As to the models, this interplay between climate change and climate variability is fascinating and this richness of behaviour is indeed seen in the climate models.

The 11 year period can be seen in the climate record, with an amplitude of a few hundredths of a degree, so a near - correspondence can be found.

For general observations see my Reflections on the Scientific Process as seen in climate studies.)

Addendum; Everything I see in climate alarmist science is, after 25 years when one would think after the hundreds of billions spent on climate research there would be huge benefits already appearing, is always sometime in the future as in the excellent «future will do this or that» examples just above.

One of the biggest mistakes that I see in the climate science community is that the meteorologists were relegated to second class citizenship in the climate debate and the physicists took over.

Could there be an H. pylori we haven't seen in the climate that causes recent warming?

cfdman — The radiative forcing garbage is just a distraction you are using to confuse is truly one of the funniest things I've seen in any climate - related forum.

The questions center on feedbacks and whether the CO2 - induced increase is greater than the noise that we see in climate.

That this signal is not seen in climate model simulations may partially explain the models» inability to simulate the current stagnation in global surface temperatures.

The problem I see in the climate discussion is that is has totally blown into a political issue.

So to help set the record straight, we're going to focus on 10 major changes scientists have seen in our climate system.

Dr John Nicol comes as close as anyone I've seen in the climate arena to actually making an excursion outside of climate science in regard to heating effect with a couple of paragraphs on precision laser cutting of hard metals but doesn't go far enough with it I don't think.

Do you think that uncertainty as seen in the climate debate can not be estimated?

When you compare the assumptions used by Ioannidis to what we see in climate science, the reliability of global warming research can be expected to be far worse and so it is.

But what we often seen in climate «science» is all of these or some of these missing.

But the underlying problem of Bad Science is far broader than what we see in climate science.

But I can come to Climate Etc. and find smart and knowledgeable people that promote arguments that provide clear evidence for how the motivated reasoning we see in the climate wars is paralleled in the same folks as a more general phenomenon in other politically polarized issues as well.

And as much as the aim may be to produce a value - free investigation of the material world, we see in the climate debate that the issue is muddied.

Tipping points are a reality seen in climate data.

These are not players we want to see in our climate solutions, in our climate policy.

«Thus, the «human» fingerprint is detectable in the changes we've seen in climate over recent decades.

it is found that global temperature trends since 1998 are consistent with internal variability overlying the forced trends seen in climate model projections (Easterling and Wehner, 2009; Mitchell et al., 2012b); see also Figure 1.1, where differences between the observed and multimodel response of comparable duration occurred earlier.

The changes we see in our climate (historically and currently) are actually from other sources; changes in the shape of the Earth's orbit, for example, or the chemistry in our atmosphere.

I see in the climate research community a strong presence of the status / security dynamic.

When a Danish bank wrote a report concluding that something was amiss in the Icelandic banking sector the reaction was eerily similar to what we see in climate science.

You have in common with them that the main contributors to the energy balance are ignored completely, and that you give no rationale why the 2 W / m2 from the CO2 increase can be just ignored when much smaller solar forcing variations contributed to things like the Maunder Minimum, and short volcanic variations of this magnitude are seen in the climate record.

Thus the signature of an oscillation dominated by strong positive feedback is clear, a monotonic oscillation, and this is not seen in the climate record.

Models are great, but we can also see things in the paleo record that are not reflected well in the models but are reflected in changes we see in the climate today.

Kurtz's hypothesis helps explain the outrage, hate and revenge seen in some climate catastrophists, a viewpoint found in much of McKibben's own work.

The head - shrinking of the public by... let's call them «psychocrats»... is the broader phenomenon which either encompasses, or at least overlaps with what we have seen in the climate debate, most notably from the likes of Lewandowsky.

Again, it is not really a surprise that local records have high levels of variability, and the «long - term persistent» character of climate records has been reported before and is even seen in climate models.

The analyses in McLean et al. are among the worst I have seen in the climate literature.

IMO, the vast majority of the morality - hunting and motive - hunting that I see in the climate wars looks to me like the basic identity - aggressive and identity - defensive behaviors that are the manifestations of cultural cognition.

And «That natural climate variability can explain everything we see in the climate system» is a crock of you - know - what (Spencer isn't Japanese, by the way).

The kind of behaviour we see in climate science is not at all unusual — cf. Planck: «Science advances one funeral at a time».

Not exact matches

Political analysts and experts predict we'll see some changes in what they might entail in along the way - based both on political climate and economic factors.

Certain countries susceptible to climate change have seen a spike in travel interest over the past year, according to a new report from travel insurance comparison web site Squaremouth.

The benefit of a small company in an office climate is you can sort of eavesdrop on conversations to see if there's any conflicts and understand the culture that you're in.

The State Business Tax Climate Index, now in its 10th edition, can see notable shifts in the rankings from year to year.

If the building is approaching 10 years old, or the HVAC systems have seen inordinate use (in an especially hot climate, say), get the HVAC systems inspected, along with the plumbing and electrical equipment.

According to the International Energy Agency, reducing pollution to levels consistent with limiting climate change to less than two degrees would see 715 million EVs cruising the streets in 2040 — which would also shrink global oil demand by 20 % relative to today.

In his book The World in 2050: Four Forces Shaping Civilization's Northern Future, Laurence Smith, a professor of geography and earth and space sciences at UCLA, argues that we're about to see a productivity and culture boom in the north, driven by climate change, shifting demographics, globalization and the hunt for natural resourceIn his book The World in 2050: Four Forces Shaping Civilization's Northern Future, Laurence Smith, a professor of geography and earth and space sciences at UCLA, argues that we're about to see a productivity and culture boom in the north, driven by climate change, shifting demographics, globalization and the hunt for natural resourcein 2050: Four Forces Shaping Civilization's Northern Future, Laurence Smith, a professor of geography and earth and space sciences at UCLA, argues that we're about to see a productivity and culture boom in the north, driven by climate change, shifting demographics, globalization and the hunt for natural resourcein the north, driven by climate change, shifting demographics, globalization and the hunt for natural resources.

Instead of a world dominated by renewable sources of power like wind and solar — as people concerned about the dangers of climate change would hope — PE execs see gas, oil and even coal as a substantial component of electricity and fuel sources in 2039, according to recent interviews conducted by CNBC.com on the future of energy as part of CNBC's 25th anniversary.

On Monday, as Irma weakened over Georgia, Bossert used a White House briefing to offer more hints of an emerging climate resilience policy, while notably avoiding accepting climate change science: «What President Trump is committed to is making sure that federal dollars aren't used to rebuild things that will be in harm's way later or that won't be hardened against the future predictable floods that we see.