E4E members
see issues of teacher quality, evaluations, pay and incentives, pensions and tenure to be top - of - mind among teachers nationwide, with those issues and others including the expired teachers contract taking center stage in the complex Los Angeles education debate.
Not exact matches
find agencies in their area both by postcode or by name; rate agencies using a simple star rating system on levels
of pay,
quality of training, ease
of finding work and support received; write reviews, explaining their experiences, both good and bad,
of the agency, or agencies, they have used; read reviews written by other supply
teachers, including viewing their star rating and
seeing the average levels
of pay that are offered; add new supply agencies as and when they open; and participate in regular polls, highlighting the key
issues that affect supply
teachers.
He was also struck by the level
of agreement on
teacher quality issues among Democrats and Republicans, and how many parents said they wanted to
see changes in their children's schools.
[I]
saw so many difficult
issues within the district: lack
of quality teaching, lack
of leadership in buildings, lack
of empathy and understanding
of the children, [and] the lack
of access to services that would have made high - performing
teachers really be able to deliver the promise for kids.
The controversial National Council on
Teacher Quality (NCTQ)-- created by the conservative Thomas B. Fordham Institute and funded (in part) by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation as «part of a coalition for «a better orchestrated agenda» for accountability, choice, and using test scores to drive the evaluation of teachers» (see here; see also other instances of controversy here and here)-- recently issued yet another report about state's teacher evaluation systems titled: «Running in Place: How New Teacher Evaluations Fail to Live Up to Promises.
Teacher Quality (NCTQ)-- created by the conservative Thomas B. Fordham Institute and funded (in part) by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation as «part
of a coalition for «a better orchestrated agenda» for accountability, choice, and using test scores to drive the evaluation
of teachers» (
see here;
see also other instances
of controversy here and here)-- recently
issued yet another report about state's
teacher evaluation systems titled: «Running in Place: How New Teacher Evaluations Fail to Live Up to Promises.
teacher evaluation systems titled: «Running in Place: How New
Teacher Evaluations Fail to Live Up to Promises.
Teacher Evaluations Fail to Live Up to Promises.»