Sentences with phrase «see judging by»

I'd make all kinds of flavors, as you can see judging by the oatmeal tag on my site.

Not exact matches

If you've ever seen a stranger behaving badly — a mother yelling at her kids in the grocery store or someone who's inebriated in public — you may have reacted by silently judging this person.

In one of the most quoted parts of the speech, he spoke of his wish to see his children judged not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

Meanwhile, the banking industry is, not surprisingly, dismayed by the judge's ruling, saying that large and small banks will see their revenues squeezed.

We've seen a lot of models popping up over the last seven or eight years with a lot of bells and whistles, but at the end of day you're judged by results.

You can see the ethical dilemma in a basic - income experiment: You're toying with people's financial health, and, by judging your endpoints based on feelings, you're tinkering with and assessing human behavior.

A US federal judge has extended the freeze $ 27 million in assets owned by individuals behind Longfin, a company that saw its value surge as much as 2600 % in late December following a purported pivot into the cryptocurrency space.

Reason I ask is, you told me you were «pretty happy» with your current provider — and that is a lot different than saying «we're crushing it with our current provider and I don't see any reason to change» — which is what DiscoverOrg's clients say, judging by our incredibly high retention rate.

And because credit - card rewards aren't seen as currency in the eyes of the law, they're often glanced over by judges and lawyers during divorce negotiations.

You can not see the charges, but you can judge how much charges there is by looking at how the phone functions or display on the monitor.

«It gives an objective measure by business judges when they see the quality of our students.

She didn't ask to be judged by shallow prats who can't see past their own physical desires.

my greatest concern is this «new teaching» on cussing is that I don't see it throughout the life, ministry or teachings of Jesus or any of the disciples or really any man God uses in the word... What I do hear Him say is that we will be «judged by every careless word» and that's not legalism, that's red letter.

you cant put your finger on it, cant smell it, or taste it, but your soul will rejoice, if you have one left... this is your connection to the world, to the universe... nothing else really matters at all... we see all of this creation, and we've got the math and science to figure out a tenth of it, but if we cant realize that it was put here ultimatly out of love, and saved by the love of ONE true God, then we are blind even to that tenth... God is great, and may he bless you athiest, muslim, christian, jew, gay, whatever... God is Love, but rest assure He is also our Judge, the Judge of our hearts, hope you get them right.

But to get to primary assertion of if not be based on Christian principles — read the Constitution & study Christianity (because judging by your words, you don't know it) and if you can't see the correlation then you just don't want to.

Judging by the behaviour I read about and see for myself, I do not believe that.

I forgive every single person that has caused me both serious injury and those who have done little... I don't see a need for «hell»... and if God is listening — judge me and those around my by that standard.

ESCR scientists are mounting a furious political assault against the lawsuit, currently back in Royce Lamberth's court urging that human embryonic stem cell research continue to be funded by the Feds, hoping to pressure the judge to see it their way.

When the apostles had been asked by the government to no longer preach anything about Christ, Peter and John responded by saying «Whether it is right in the sight of God to listen to you rather than to God, you must judge, for we can not but speak of what we have seen and heard (Acts 4:19 - 20).»

Only God can judge a soul by seeing what is in a man's heart.

Charlie, you seriously do not see that this was a serious breach of the separation of church and state, and this judge abused her position by forcing a name change based on her religion?

satans aim was to stop the fulfillment of the seed that would crush satan underfoot.This hybrid between the angels and man created giants abominations in Gods eyes.They also were a threat to Gods people as can be seen by the giants in the land of caanan after the flood.If we agree on that then there is no way that Eve would have had intercourse with satan [false doctrine of the seed of satan -RCB- because the blood lines were still untainted by angelic beings or satan at the time of Noah maybe that is also why the genealogy of Christ is well presented with no surprises apart from Hagar and Ruth these two were gentiles that shows Gods mercy grace was always there to all nations he accepts people by faith not by race.Prior to the flood the mixing of the angels and man must have been widespread after the flood these beings were present but in limited numbers and God told his people to destroy them as they were abominations but they were a threat to Gods people.It would be interesting to hear what the rabbis had to say on this matter as i would think the stories would have been past down from generation to the next.Especially regarding the flood.God promised he would never flood the earth again but a time is coming when the earth will be judged not by flood but by fire Jesus is our ark and we are safe in him.brentnz

there is no need to judge anyone of anything, seeing christians aren't allowed to judge; so thus by telling anyone that doesn't follow your idea of the correct way to live that they «are going to need to get right with god» or the ever so famous» you're going to burn in hell» speeches you are thus breaking one of «gods»» commands and all sin is equal in his eyes so we'll be seeing you in hell.

In him they saw how things really are; they saw that in all the universe the central fact and the sovereign power is the love which shone out in him, the love by which they found themselves judged, forgiven, able to be re-created so as to become new people.

I also know that humans by flawed default will interpret the words as they morally see fit, because it is in our nature to judge others against ourselves and our own ethics, beliefs, and morals.

I don't know how many times I heard,» their just going to spend it on beer», «that's the governments job»,» it's their own fault and God is judging them,» I have seen so many people healed by secular organizations, physically and Spiritually.

Item: regardless of the mistake about the cat identity, the film clearly invites us to judge Llewyn poorly for abandoning the second cat, to associate that with his abandoning these two children to death or fatherlessness, and to see the hitting of the cat as a sign of his sin, and of how the one child will be wounded for life by it.

But we must not equate our personal financial decisions with godliness and use them as the yardstick by which to judge — because while we may be able to see what others are spending, we almost always can't tell why.

Us pagans believe we are endowed with reason which allows us to judge whether or not someone can be trusted to deliver on their promises, if they are dangerous, or harmful — by watching their behavior - We judge — not some other being upstairs - Obama has shown his lack of human compassion and untruthfulness for 4 years, we have seen that his God is re-election money and that is at who's feet he worships.

Many representatives of non-Western cultures see it as an insulting form of condescension» Westerners judging them by a standard lower than their own and even treating them as cases of diminished responsibility.

In a letter to Justice Minister Mohammed al - Issa seen by Reuters, eight judges complained about foreign trainers who shave their beards contrary to purist Islam, the minister's meetings with diplomats of «infidel» states and plans to let women practice as lawyers.

You seem to have highlighted particular sins as though some are worse than others all sin leads to death not just the big ones because we all are sinners.All have gone astray none are righteous.I believe the worst sin is pride idolatry is the first commandment we set ourselves as Gods.Regardless of what the sin is, our hearts are condemned by our pride.It wasnt the sin of homosexuality or sexual deviance that destroyed sodom.It was there pride and it is one of our biggest stumbling blocks in our christian walk or it certainly was for me.We look at the story of the adulterous woman and we think adultery is a terrible crime but the story is for our benefit to show that we all are sinners that Jesus does nt condemn us but came to save us.And when Jesus says go and sin no more he was not only talking to the woman but everyone else that was around judging her for her sin its a universal message that we all need to see that we all are condemned because of our sin that Jesus came to save us and that we turn from our sin and follow him.Because he is the way the truth and the life.brentnz

Reuters: Saudi sharia judges decry «Westernizing stench» of king's legal reforms Saudi judges who enforce sharia (Islamic law) have condemned what they see as «the stench of Western ideas» in sweeping legal reforms pushed by King Abdullah, underscoring friction between government modernizers and religious hardliners.

Rather than address his contribution to the understanding of propositions with respect to both the judging and entertaining subjects, let me proceed by focusing on the latter, for it is here that the originality of Whitehead's theory of propositions can be seen more clearly and the unique ontological status of propositions comes into relief.

It seems you judge every person by all the stupidity of terrorists you see on TV.

We don't, we judge you by your inability to see that your man - made fairy tale is not real and filled with nonsense.

God had seen fit to judge this blasphemer named Jesus by hanging Him on a tree, for as the Scriptures say, «Cursed is everyone who hangs on a tree.»

If the law were seen by everyone the same then we would only need judges at the district level but we do not have that, do we?

By drawing extensively on his letters, Dodaro allows the reader to see how Augustine responded to concrete problems faced by magistrates and judgeBy drawing extensively on his letters, Dodaro allows the reader to see how Augustine responded to concrete problems faced by magistrates and judgeby magistrates and judges.

Besides, in a rhetoric ruled by a logic, testimony even conceived as a relation of transpired facts, occupies necessarily an inferior place, for it shows the dependence of the judgment and of the judge with regard to something exterior: on the first level, the things spoken by another, and on the second, things seen by him.

It must be seen as having in its own nature a right to dominate feeling, and as constituting the principle by which feeling must be judged.

The crescent is very beautiful and perhaps that is all one like I am should or could see; but what I am afraid of, dear God, is that my self shadow will grow so large that it blocks the whole moon, and that I will judge myself by the shadow that is nothing.

And the moment we renounce the absurd notion that a thing is exploded away as soon as it is classed with others, or its origin is shown; the moment we agree to stand by experimental results and inner quality, in judging of values — who does not see that we are likely to ascertain the distinctive significance of religious melancholy and happiness, or of religious trances, far better by comparing them as conscientiously as we can with other varieties of melancholy, happiness, and trance, than by refusing to consider their place in any more general series, and treating them as if they were outside of nature's order altogether?

He shall not judge by what his eyes see, or decide by what his ears hear; but with righteousness he shall judge the poor, and decide with equity for the meek of the earth.

Most of them, to judge by what I've seen of them and their advance notices, are by authors who want to change the subject - to what's wrong with church teaching on sexuality, to celibacy, to women's ordination, to democratizing decision making, to anything but fidelity.

belief in anything without supporting evidence is a childrens game... We teach our children not to lie, judge a book by its cover, or to take anything at face value or to just believe without questioning... you know, we say stuff like check the source and don't believe everything you see / hear... should we teach seeking knowledge or to have faith in without?

When one sees the setting and the intent of the passage, he often stops admiring it because one's aesthetic appreciation for it is chastened by a sense of being judged by it.

If you are as logical as you claim, you would see this fallacy immediately and pick more rational ways by which to judge the state of your personal safety.

Moreover, the fundamental error in the judge's statement can be seen by the simple expedient of a counter example: should a white supremacist attack an African American man it would be considered a hate crime without regards to what anyone was saying at the time.

When God accuses earthly judges of «wrong judgment», He follows it up by telling them to see that the poor «have right» (82:2, 3).