Concerns have recently been raised that the change from the FMSiS to the SFVS will
see less accountability, a lack of evidence and little intervention and review of a schools performance.
Not exact matches
Major not as much... what needs to happen really with Wenger at least
seeing out is current contract is more
accountability &
less blind trust.
Or we have a system where you have
less accountability — and we've
seen what that looks like.
Reforms lead to
less accountability, more centralisation and vulnerability to capture by vested interests — as we've
seen with idiotic Free Schools (
seen to be failing in Finland).
In fact, with a new Department of Education seemingly more inclined to abide by what ESSA actually says and
less inclined to make things up as it goes along (
see: Obama ED's adventures with «supplement not supplant»), states have big opportunities when it comes to testing,
accountability, school improvement, and more — and the responsibility to take advantage of them.
Yet we
see somewhat
less progress when it comes to making
accountability systems fair to high - poverty schools.
The suggestion that local authorities could become chains is not
seen as a positive step, but something that reverses autonomy, giving them more power with
less electoral
accountability.
And this idea that «if broken into smaller districts, we will
see fewer people who understand special education laws and possibly
less compliance and
accountability than we
see now» is specious.
When considered against this index, Australia's international
accountability can be
seen to be
less than perfect.