Not exact matches
I can not
see any reason to suppose that this need for objective
criticism of immediate insights is
less today than it was in St. Paul's time, or in Luther's and Calvin's.
He gets
less criticism and is overhyped to an extent from the English press because he is
seen to be English.
What I
see much
less of — though perhaps I have just missed it — is a similar degree of self -
criticism by social liberal Lib Dems.
All that said, Guild Wars 2 is still my game, for all my
criticisms of it, and while I find plenty to frown at with this new system, I'm also feeling encouraged to
see ArenaNet seemingly taking player feedback into account and trying new ways to make money that are
less bad — and
less about getting away with as much gambling as possible — than the rest of the industry with its lockbox - infatuated debauchery.
I think the core of your argument as I
see it (the need for scientists to be
less defensive,
less circling of the wagons, more introspection, more communication and collaboration with «outsiders», taking
criticism seriously, etc) is important and valid.
Microsoft would have
seen much
less criticism if it did.