(Note: you may
see more evaporation of liquids with the stovetop method.
Not exact matches
Ironically, though, the large amounts of lake effect snow have been linked to the warming of the lake, resulting in
more evaporation, convective lift and, therefore, snow than previously
seen.
Further, let's agree that this will on average cause
more precipitation due to increased
evaporation at these higher temperatures (the best data I have
seen say that the precipitation trend over the continental US — where we have the best long term records — is up 5 - 10 % over the last century).
One thing that does seem clear is that warmer oceans (a la global warming) mean
more evaporation, and that likely leads to storms with
more and
more dangerous rainfall of the kind we
saw with Hurricane Irene last year.
I guess we need a laboratory test to
see how water react to various levels of IR,
more evaporation, or an increae of temperature.
You claim such a justification from the coincidence that the 1 % to 3 % increase in
evaporation seen across the models yields a range of climate sensitivities
more or less in line with the IPCC range.
There is still a cooler layer that cools
more if
evaporation increases but now we
see that the temperature measured by sensors is above that layer, is not part of it and therefore records a misleading warmth while the sub skin cools unnoticed as I said:
This is believable as higher temps would mean
more arable land,
more evaporation would mean
more rainfall and we have
seen over the last 50 years as CO2 has climbed that total biotic life on the planet has increased some 30 - 50 % according to NASA satellites measurements.