Sentences with phrase «see no evidence of how»

You will therefore see no evidence of how these aggressive funds performed when things went downhill (usually it is pretty badly).

And while I am far from perfect in this area, it is one way I see the evidence of how God has changed me (which is what we call being «born again.»)

[4] The team is also hoping to see evidence of how the rapidly moving cloud interacts with any ambient gas around the black hole.

As an example, if you're familiar with «Ask Pat» or «Money Girl's Quick and Dirty Tips,» then you've seen evidence of how shorter podcasts can provide lots of actionable information.

«We are excited to see the outstanding technology at Silicon Studio's exhibition booth at GDC 2014,» says Tomoya Asano, producer for Square Enix Co., Ltd. «Having developed Bravely Default in partnership with Silicon Studio, we can see the evidence of how innovative YEBIS 2 can be to developers globally.

Not exact matches

Rather, the current inequity in mortgage premiums should be seen as evidence of how Ottawa has retarded competition in the mortgage insurance business by allowing itself to be the biggest player.

Carriers need to see more evidence of how the jets work in real - world conditions, and positive reactions from Swiss Air Lines and AirBaltic could entice customers.

We've seen a lot of evidence about what's coming, through the HomePod firmware leak, and reports including one from Bloomberg this week that outlines exactly how the iPhone interface will work without a home button, but Apple should still have plenty to reveal that we haven't seen at this event, including at least a few amazing ARKit demos.

no apparent evidence of ill - will, and 3)... an experience of unity.Now, David, I haven't known you for very long (blogwise), but I respect what I have read from yr deep and thoughtful spirit, so with that in mind, I just don't see how this personal experience is translatable or cd be used as some kind of template when faced with the real Wal - Mart world.Do we not, like Jesus, show out true colours under pressure.Maybe I'm missing something... please correct me If I am and remember, I'm not into boob jobs (cleavage enhancement)

But quite honestly, I fail to see how the Mormon people can assert that Mary remained a virgin in light of this evidence from their prophets and apostles.

Since no one has yet to SEE an atom, the idea of the structure of the atom can only be inferred by experimental evidence — yet I see no Republican trying to stop teaching the structure of the atom in school — oh that's right, its because major corporations and industries rely on this science (pharm, weapons manufacturers etc etc) whereas the theory of evolution is merely think piece of scientists on how life on Earth changes over tiSEE an atom, the idea of the structure of the atom can only be inferred by experimental evidence — yet I see no Republican trying to stop teaching the structure of the atom in school — oh that's right, its because major corporations and industries rely on this science (pharm, weapons manufacturers etc etc) whereas the theory of evolution is merely think piece of scientists on how life on Earth changes over tisee no Republican trying to stop teaching the structure of the atom in school — oh that's right, its because major corporations and industries rely on this science (pharm, weapons manufacturers etc etc) whereas the theory of evolution is merely think piece of scientists on how life on Earth changes over time.

Still amazes me how people are so willing to follow an idea, a religion, a dude telling fairy tales from a stage, rather than the things that they see before them every day, and in doing so, tie everyday natural occurrences into evidence for the validity of their fairy tales.

And of course, you were blind to see that while I was asking those questions, I was actually providing evidence of how your postulates were incorrect!

The WAY in which you see the evidence presented to you and the condition of your heart will be a determining factor in how you interpret the evidence.

Scientists who believe in cyclical universes or spontaneous expansion see it as evidence of how the expansion happened.

It just so turns out that once humans know how something actually works, they have the incredible ability to change it to how they see fit, as evidenced by the amazing piece of technology in front of your face.

there is endless evidence via fossils and other remains of how certain cells evolved light sensitivity and spent billions of years evolving through simple compound eyes to what we see today; the myriad different eyes used by species that presently inhabit the earth.

when they wrote it and how life was when they wrote it, believe it or not, I have faith if you REALLY study the bible and all aspects of it, you will see its weaknesses... for those who believe are known for the lack of knowledge of there own faith, for those who are PROPERLY educated with open minds, quickly loose there faith when they are saturated with the false evidence that's abundantly around us each day..

Don't really see how the number of writings is relevant when they all have the exact same source evidence: the Bible / Jesus teaches...

Simply because I exist on a Planet about a billion light years from any other currently living form of life, not chemicals, elements or gases, and how I don't see this as some random thing — there is something greater than you and I and the evidence is all around you.

She responded gently, «The only evidence of sin I see is in how the world reacts to Penny.»

I've seen enough archeological evidence to support the claims of the Book of Mormon that the people that lived in the ancient America's really did exist when and how the book describes.

See they can teach evolution in schools, not due it being a conspiracy against the poor persecuted christards like you but due to it being based on solid acceptable evidence... regardless of how stupid you may wish to continue to be on the subject, you don't change the facts.

Although I originally saw similarities in how I believed in the existence of God and the existence of you despite lack of tangible evidence, I don't know that consistency is necessary in how I assess whether you exist and whether God exists.

When I honestly looked at the evidence of my life, my relationships, my internal condition [how I walked around experiencing the world], I saw that perhaps I was wrong, at least didn't have all the answers.

It is amazing how often, in casual reading or conversation, one encounters either a total inability to see and understand, or a deliberate refusal to accept, the plainest evidence of this material fact of the inevitable drawing - together of Mankind.

The beliefs are just so far out there for me, that whenever I see someone in ardent support of them I have to think they're a troll, because I don't know how they could possibly believe or accept that (there are a few exceptions of people who pt things very well, cite supporting evidence, and are consistent and coherent - I don't agree with them, but I can at least understand what they're saying)

To me this is evidence that Evangelicals can not see how flawed many of their views are.

I don't see how this is proof that God doesn't exist — rather it is evidence that this particular interpretation of religious doctrine is flawed.

It hurts my brain to see how the outcomes of probability either way are argued as evidence for divine manipulation of reality.

How about those that don't because they haven't seen any evidence of it?

I don't see how you could possibly reach the conclusion that I think we have evidence of supernatural causation.

Robespierre's address to the Commune of Paris at the convention of 1793 evidences that his Supreme Being also had this same character: «L'homme pervers se croit sans cesse environné d'un témoin puissant et terrible anquel il ne peut échapper, qui le voit et le veille, tandis que les hommes sont livrés au sommeil...» (F. A. Aulard, Le Culte de la raison et le culte de l'Être Supreme (Paris, 1892), pp. 285 f.) How can one isolate this «structure» and separate it from its biblical antecedents, when — to cite only one of the many passages — one can read in the book of Isaiah (29:15): «Woe to those who hide deep from the Lord their counsel, whose deeds are in the dark, and who say, «Who sees us?

If there is a war against christianity, it is between christian extremists and those «who require evidence prior to believing», and seeing as how there is no evidence supporting creation by an almighty whatever, and that there is tons of evidence supporting evolution, the most effective weapon in the «war» is the utter stupidity that keeps emanating from the mouths of christian loudmouths.

There is abundant evidence that Catholics in this country do sincerely believe in democracy and practice this belief, but I do not see how they themselves can deny that their polity poses a problem for democracy that is not posed by churches which make their decisions in regard to public policy by processes of open discussion in which both clergy and laymen share.

How quickly we again see clear evidence of Christardian logic at work in the world.

It is a shame that they won't recognize the obvious — that the total lack of evidence throughout the universe of a deity really does mean there are none, that the world is exactly how you see it, that everything you thinkis God is nothing more than misinterpreted natural occurances and coincidence, and that death is exactly what it appears — you just stop.

The passage, it is recognized, is late, but its evidence for the character of the Hebrew monarchy is not less reliable, for this is how we see it actually working itself out.

100 % of the evidence says Natural Universe, but that's not how the brainwashed will see it.

From idiots like that guy at SNAP, whose goal in life is to see how much money he can bilk out of the Church, after «suddenly remembering» something that happened forty years ago without any evidence?

Eventually, I will have some kind of panel done to see what I am allergic to, so that will be helpful for me in making better decisions, but until then I do want to stay gluten free because of ALL the overwhelming evidence that shows how it messes up our guts.

Wenger had clearly not seen the evidence or he would have made more of it in his post match comments but he did say that he felt that Barca were wobbling a bit when Elneny did make it 1 - 1, so how much more would they have been feeling the nerves at 2 - 1 down and a man down?

Wenger put ozil on the wing for his development one thing i do nt get is how the fans do nt see that Wenger done the same process with Wilshere, I remember when Monreal was caught out at the back post from a set piece and ozil did nt cover he just jogged abit n let monreal get beat, that would be video evidence for Ozil to learn and work on his duty to defend instead of giving him Candy like a baby n letting him be lazy in the middle not tracking back for the team its a learning process im 100 % Wenger knows ozils best position is in the centre he followed him since Shalke its obvious but Wenger develops players into world class after seeing Ozil in the world cup and coming back after the world cup i coud see he defended alot more helping out monreal on the flanks and putting in alot more effort only then once hes showed his duty in defending will he be given his free role in the middle.

But I do NOT see any evidence of «I will show them how good I am» mentality whatever.

Not all Arsenal fans will remember how much of a top class player the England international Jack Wilshere can be, as we have certainly not seen a lot of evidence to that fact over the last few years.

Seeing how quality players are moving in this transfer window am a very sad sad sad man.The other big clubs have confirmed they will spend big but for Wenger he said we have enough depth in the squad but if special player is available we can buy, now special players are not available without a bid.We have only one Arsene but we cant win major trophies with wenger he used to win them when it was a two horse race, only utd were a threat but now he cant repeat the invincible era or win epl 10 yrs can evidence there is competition and we are not in it.Clubs like chelsea are in debts cuz of buying wc players to win trophies, We put club into debt b4 to build stadium so he can generate more revenue for club owners and share holders

On the evidence to date it is difficult to see how West Ham could field a weakened defence but we can expect to see first outings of the season for Adrain, James Collins and Sam Byram tonight.

As part of reaching this judgment, inspectors will look at the extent to which schools are successfully supporting pupils to gain «knowledge of how to keep themselves healthy» and «evidence of a culture or ethos of exercise and healthy eating» throughout their entire inspection (see www.schoolfoodplan.com/ofsted).

As far as evaluating empirical evidence goes, it is enough to check the reviews of compression stockings for nurses on Amazon to see how many people love and swear by them.

Bring earth science to life for your students as they look for evidence of the rock cycle at work and see first - hand how glaciers have marked the New England landscape of Moose Hill.