Sentences with phrase «see none other»

None of this comes as any surprise when the end credits roll and we see none other than John Logan credited on the screenplay.
It was way, way back in July when we caught wind that Sam Raimi had plans for an Evil Dead TV series that would see none other than Bruce Campbell return as the legendary chainsaw - wielding hero, Ash.

Not exact matches

Unlike other retailers, the company sees none of the profits — instead, making its money by leasing space to product makers on a month - to - month basis.
Other companies have released versions over the past decade, but none has seen mainstream success, and several have gone belly - up.
As industry job cuts top 200,000 worldwide, Exxon has kept its 75,300 - strong workforce intact with none of the sweeping layoffs seen at other oil companies, including its biggest U.S. rival Chevron Corp. «Exxon is just stronger financially than anyone else out there,» Brian Youngberg, an analyst at Edward Jones & Co. in St. Louis, said in an interview.
Let's take a look at STORE to see why its strong fundamentals have attracted the attention of none other than Warren Buffett, history's greatest investor, who recently purchased a 10 % stake in the company.
Can you see why equality under the law and equal rights for everyone means throwing out the bias of religion, as none of them agree with the others on anything.
At Fort Sumter I thought in terms of Glory — a film which none of the others had seen.
Recognizing this fact, the National Atheist Party has no quarrel with those that would like to see the «cross» as a part of such a memorial, with the caveat that other faiths, including none at all, should also be represented.
I had a hard time loving because of pain and hurt in my life... from none other than my family... but I asked God to allow me to see them through his eyes... that helped me pick up the pieces... hand them to Jesus and allow him to lead me and guide my way to him... that is the only hope of life we have.
Yeah, that sort of makes the whole thing supernatural, and yes that requires evangelicals to see the fruit of the Spirit and the «mere Christianity» in believers in other denominations (and none), but I'm just naive and stupid enough to think God can do stuff like that.
If I had not done among them the works which none other man did, they had not had sin: but now have they both seen and hated both me and my Father.»
If the minister has not read and studied the Bible, gone to theological seminary and learned about other branches of theology, acquired an insight and a skill or two along the way, and seen what he was trying to do in a context appropriate to the ministry of the Christian church, none of what I am asserting would follow.
muslimism, absurdity of a muslim secular, ignorant self centered, who reveled truth of flow of fresh and salt water flowing together in seas, but never mixing with each other, hundreds of years before muslim s, non believers could see it with their own eyes, None other than truth absolute, GOD, foundation of existence and consti tuion of USA, designer and creator of world HIMSELF.
You seem to have highlighted particular sins as though some are worse than others all sin leads to death not just the big ones because we all are sinners.All have gone astray none are righteous.I believe the worst sin is pride idolatry is the first commandment we set ourselves as Gods.Regardless of what the sin is, our hearts are condemned by our pride.It wasnt the sin of homosexuality or sexual deviance that destroyed sodom.It was there pride and it is one of our biggest stumbling blocks in our christian walk or it certainly was for me.We look at the story of the adulterous woman and we think adultery is a terrible crime but the story is for our benefit to show that we all are sinners that Jesus does nt condemn us but came to save us.And when Jesus says go and sin no more he was not only talking to the woman but everyone else that was around judging her for her sin its a universal message that we all need to see that we all are condemned because of our sin that Jesus came to save us and that we turn from our sin and follow him.Because he is the way the truth and the life.brentnz
He is probably the greatest missionary the world has ever seen, he wrote a large percentage of the Christian Scriptures, he was a champion of God's grace and of the Gospel for the Gentiles, and he had a theological mind and loving heart like none other.
Then you truly do not understand the true nature of God... He saw that none of us would be good enough to attain heaven (except little children who die at an early age) so He sent the only One who had never sinned, who even though he sweated blood and asked if there was any other way, but ultimately said,» not my will but Yours,» paid our way into Heaven.
I see none, other than salving the conscience of the priest or pastor hung up on whether or not the words on a document are so imprecise as to be silly.
19 I saw none of the other apostles — only James, the Lord's brother.
Either way none of these approaches to knowledge and reality really corresponds to the way in which we actually work, and the way in which reality is structured, as other symposium papers have discussed (Editor: See our September 2006 and May 2008 editorials).
The lesser kinds of reverence have been noted only in order that we may be quite clear that even in Catholic circles the term worship is applied normally to God and none other, although it is important that we understand that by association with God and His presence and work, creatures are seen in the Christian tradition as worthy of something even more remarkable than the respect for personality of which democracy has spoken — they are worthy of reverence which is religious in quality, reverence about which there is a mystery, just as in human personality itself there is a deep mystery by reason of its being grounded in the mystery of God.
Atheists don't all see religion the same way, but many resent the fact that religious believers have imposed their religious beliefs on others despite the fact that none of them have any proof that what they believe is correct.
«This manifesto calls for the «removal» of the Mormons for, among other things: ``... inviting free (Blacks) from other states to become «Mormons,» and remove and settle among us... and one of the surest means of driving us from the country; for it would require none of the supernatural gifts that they pretend to, to see that the introduction of such a caste...»»
On the other hand we have seen a great (and more successful) national leader say, while war still raged: «With malice toward none; with charity for all; with firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in; to bind up the nation's wounds; to care for him who shall have borne the battle, and for his widow and his orphan — to do all which may achieve and cherish a just, and a lasting peace, among ourselves, and with all nations.»
life is about right and worg thats wart i know about the bible you have to have fath in this turth or you will never understeand how the bible has the guid line for how thay can be peace in the world if you will really spead a lot of time reading the bible than look up on google or in some other books to many for me to name im taking about none chritin books at that and comeper them you will find that there is a lot of stuff that proves the bible as being right i wise i kone how to say it better to but i cant sorry but wan you pray just ast if there is a god make your self real to me other wise i have to hard a time beliveing somepen i cant see or hear and he will make his safe real and than you just sheek him to show you ware to go from there
It continued after the excerpt above:» «Be of good cheer» by such words and none other, let your heart be moved, dear mother», and she was to be thankful that she lived in a time when they no longer had to see Jesus as a Judge.
But none of these concepts correspond to the sense in which Whitehead and other process thinkers see the role of final causation in the world.
There has, instead, been a tendency to see nature as none other than the stage on which the drama of human life is performed.
none i have ever seen had anything other than «congrats you survived high school.»
What the editorial does not point out, however, is that the archbishop who proposed and saw through that compromise was none other than William J. Levada, now prefect of the Sacred Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith — the number - two position in the Vatican, and the same position held by Ratzinger when the San Francisco compromise was reached.
Additionally, none of the 3 witnesses of the Book of Mormon (Martin Harris, Oliver Cowdery or David Whitmer) ever denied seeing the plates... they all left over other disagreements.
So, for one week I posted under other names, none that I had ever seen used before.
As you look through these and the others in the round - up, you'll see that almost none of them call for steaming the spinach before using in the dish, as we discussed one should do to reduce oxalic acid.
Just about every single one of the Paleo cookies, brownies, or healthy bites recipes you see here on the site have been vetted by, none other than, our weekly running group.
I tried looking at other avocado soup recipes to see whether they had suggested shelf life, but none of them seemed to.
After she passes away, I asked Daddy to bring home the same flour and you will never guess what we saw as we emptied out the bags - NONE OTHER THAN ROBIN HOOD HIMSELF
It makes me laugh seeing those who are scared of change, it will happen whether you like it or not, you are only delaying the inevitable and giving other clubs chances to win more premier leagues while we win none and lets not even talk about champions league..
Virtually all fans want Kroenke out of our club - I have seen NONE and no posts that want him to remain and I doubt that anyone else has either — and fan polls show us that more than 80 % would like Wenger to retire (though of this 80 % some, like me, want it today and others at end of season BUT they all want him out by seasons end.
This guy is the most negative manager I've ever seen and the most stubborn but he will do whatever it takes to suffocate us because the LAST thing his diminishing confidence can take is a loss to none other than his arch enemy Mr. Wenger.
But once media hypes dudes up it's over for making people see past the cloud of dancing bear terms and completely irrelevant nfl player comparisons... yes I said it I'd take Bryan over any other dt in this class, and none of them are worth a top 10 pick!
Very few managers in the premiership will tolerate Ozil's tempo in some games, and definitely none of the other big clubs will allow it as can be seen in the cases of very good players like Oscar, Depay and the likes.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
back in the day we had a double act up front that worked in tandem perfectly in berkamp and henry one couldn't really function without the other properly almost the perfect combo for a strike pair graceful speedy winger converted c / f and the perfect no 10 with perfect all round vision and goalscoring ability what do we have now that is that equivalence we have a wordly no 10 but no great gracefully speedy henry type c / f and there are none like that out there atm maybe a few potential wannabes remy lacaztte and the likes but really ozil needs a double act with someone and maybe we will see it click into place with sanchez maybe he has the ability to be an henry winger converted c / f has similar traits pace skill strength can score ace goals just needs to find his feet at c / f and he will form a deadly partnership with ozil i think maybe the old time wenger classic 4411 the ox on the left and walcott on the right Ramsey and new d / m in the middle would work a treat for me this formation never dies out just gets reinvented to suit the players available
How possible is it that Stan Kroenke and all the other board members can see as clearly as everyone else that we have a striker problem — and yet none of them can instruct Wenger to buy a striker?
Whatever the problem, it was clearly a problem amongst the personalities in the team, because when you saw the shots of the bench yesterday, the players were laughing and joking amongst each other, and we looked like a proper team, whereas before there was none of that, and players weren't even congratulating each other when they scored.
In other home games I've seen unspeakable amounts of empty seats in a symbolic form of protest, but none today.
i don't see any sense in the article apart from promoting england players by the way people on here praise the ox but none realises that his final product ends in the hands of the defenders after exciting us with he runs in to defenders, i don't mean to say he's bad but i'd prefer him in the middle because there he makes runs and shoot on sight other than in the wings where he hardly create a thing... put campbell, Sanchez and walcot in the wings.
I too also know that we look weak at the back but i also believe they have learnt from there mistakes last season and have a stronger unity this season going into the 3rd season with the team wenger has put together without losing key players and adding real Quality and world class that i havent seen before because none of our history says we bought our trophies we won them with all the unexpected beliefs and never bought into the society and modern game we seen before us not one of our legends were already labelled for they are today before they came to us The made a name for themselfs in our Jersey and build a foundation of what we represent today Before Arsene Wenger and with him We are a club that overachieve and under promise Everything we've done has be our very own unique way of doing it not the way other clubs are ahiceving i for one will not Follow the Man City's ambitions Chelseas Manchester united or anyone elses
Every rumor I've seen is they really want Darnold, but none of ther other QBs.
I think we need another top goal scoring midfielder too, when Alexis is not firing we seen already that none of the others can either.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z