Sentences with phrase «see point number»

Unless you are involuntarily displaced from a flight within the United States (see point number three), an airline is not required to give compensation for delayed or canceled flights.

See point number two of Dave's four predictions of the future.

Instead, all one has to do is scrub crusty, cooked - on bits from the pan with a big handful of kosher salt, wipe it down with a smear of fat (see point number three!)

Not exact matches

Those are great numbers to see, but I'm really surprised it's not higher at this point.

As a matter of fact, there is no point in denying that by all means clichés surely increase the number of words in the text, which is clearly seen in this sentence.

The further you get from that point estimate, the less likely it is that you are seeing the true number.

When consumers reach the breaking point, one expects to see rising numbers of mortgages in arrears.

And while 41 percent of small business owners say they don't see any indications that the recession is over, that's actually three percentage points lower than the number of consumers who say economic conditions have not improved.

Even notorious basement - dwellers like New York's JFK and LaGuardia airports saw a nearly 10 percentage point improvement in their on time arrivals, according to the numbers.

He points out that a number of divisions saw growth, inclduing its PC and data centre segments.

Instead, use these numbers as a jumping - off point to determine where you should begin engaging, but be sure to measure your performance on each site to see when and if you need to change course.

Wired has called gamification an enemy of great support, and while dissenting opinions often point to cases like Microsoft and the increased productivity they saw when implementing gamification, the numbers don't tell the full story — a lower response time does not mean your team is doing a better job of taking care of customers.

Numbers marketers usually get on influencer campaigns come either from their influencers or third - party providers «grading their own homework,» as Points North co-founder Peter Storck sees it.

Your APR is determined by a few key data points you'll see on your offer sheet — the total loan amount, origination fee, the total amount you'll eventually pay back to the lender once the loan has run its course, and the number of payments you'll make.

We should also see a significant pick up in the number of stocks hitting new 52 - week highs versus stocks falling to new 52 - week lows... If anything, the only point of concern we have with the current buy signal is that the major averages (S&P 500, Nasdaq, and Dow) are still trading below their 50 - day moving averages.»

A potential acquirer will want to see your numbers going up — otherwise, what's the point of buying?

Bill Protection kicks in at different usage points based on the number of people on your plan, and you can see how it would work for your group here.

«Political uncertainty in Russia has seen a definite fall in the number of Russians looking to buy in Italy, especially at the upper end of the market ($ 5million - plus) most notably around parts of Sardinia and coastal Tuscany, but there has been an increase in Russian interest at lower price points especially in Liguria.

For instance, typing «graphic design» into Google's Keyword Planner, you'll see a number of longer phrases that could be great starting points for new content, including «Reddit graphic design.»

Before you pay points to get a lower mortgage rate, run the numbers to see if it makes sense for you.

You'll want to assess your spending, both the typical amounts as well as where you do the bulk of your spending; decide what type of rewards — cash back, miles or points — will be most beneficial to you; and crunch the numbers to see whether you can offset an annual fee.

«We're seeing some pickup in growth that's outside the U.S. that's being reflected in these earnings numbers,» said Nick Raich, CEO of The Earnings Scout, pointing out that «the U.S. data is domestic focused.»

This was an 8 - percentage - point increase over the numbers we saw in July 2016.

I think the point is you have to look at a number of studies that compile the data in different ways to see what is really going on.

The wordless counting involves two capacities, the first being «seeing numbers» or choosing the object with a certain number of points on it from among a group of objects with points differing in number, size, color and arrangement.

Now there are a number of important footnotes to Aristotle, but I simply wish to draw attention to the point of culmination of the tradition, that period bridging the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries that saw the production of the grand synthesis of the Angelic Doctor, Saint Thomas Aquinas, as well as its poetic embodiment in The Divine Comedy of Dante.

This last point is suggested in a number of Peirce's discussions, particularly in his accounts of the function of the sciences (see, for instance, 1.191) as well as in his references to the goal of rational conduct which is the summum bonum (e.g., 5.4 - 5, 5.433).

How are we to prevent this compression of Mankind on the closed surface of the planet (a thing that is good in itself, as we have seen, since it promotes social unification) from passing that critical point beyond which any increase in numbers will mean famine and suffocation?

I'm not sure if your pointing fun at people who do this kind of ministry, but I just want to back them up and say that I have seen a countless number of healings happen in such a way.

As The Nation pointed out after the election, «One out of every four Trump voters voted with the Supreme Court in mind, and it's a safe bet that a very substantial number of those see the Supreme Court through the lens of abortion politics... If you can rally voters around abortion, few other issues matter.»

Those who study religious demographics have seen the statistics pointing to Christian and Muslims — not Christians and secularists — as the two groups contesting most for numbers in the decades to come.

What the editorial does not point out, however, is that the archbishop who proposed and saw through that compromise was none other than William J. Levada, now prefect of the Sacred Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith — the number - two position in the Vatican, and the same position held by Ratzinger when the San Francisco compromise was reached.

It seems to us that there are a number of promising points in this statement of the «new quest» position, and when we develop our own position below it will be seen that we are indebted to it at several places.

A little note: Some of my four preferred companies sell a number of products and whilst I'm sure they're all pure and delicious, I have not seen them all nor reviewed their ingredients so please note my support at this point is solely for the almond milks.

By averaging 19.7 points and 11.9 rebounds with a 66.7 true shooting percentage, Ayton is putting up big man numbers that essentially haven't been seen before.

As others have pointed out, the last several years of the Paterno staff saw a limited number of assistants, and the absence of the head coach, out on the recruiting trail.

He said on Arsenal.com after yesterdays win: «You saw last season that we picked up a number of points against the teams outside the top four,»

While this won't be an ideal situation for a while, I agree that a pressing system would likely reduce the number of times we see the Timbers taking an early lead and then relaxing to the point where opponents are allowed back into the game.

You keep saying that he's taking us backwards, yet if you did any research (I know, it's unheard of for you) prior to posting yet another garbage of a post, you'd see that our points total this year is better than in any of the previous 4 years after the same number of games.

As you can see, over 30 % of games we analyzed finished with a 3 - point or 7 - point margin of victory, showing exactly why sharp bettors consider these to be «key numbers».

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

you also bashed mahinmi for a while constantly pointing to numbers and now that he's been healthier everyone is seeing that he can contribute on this team.

Okay, looking at the number of points per game so far, Leicester would finish on 83 points while Arsenal's total would be 78, so you can see that Wenger's 80 points is quite a realistic figure.

But as stat heads like to point out, the numbers see every game.

As with all games lined on the «3» and «7», we are seeing a lot of point buying through the key number.»

Although the number of previous game matches and overall units won wanes at each data point, we do see our systems return on investment increase as we focus on higher scoring offensive teams.

SEE MORE: Andros Townsend squad number: New Newcastle signing takes shirt of player who ended Tottenham career Petr Cech says Southampton star ROBBED Arsenal of three points Premier League club owner subjected to death chant after latest loss in relegation battle

Last year we saw most of the top season point totals to go Over their numbers, but this year most of the top totals are trending toward the Under:

He is also willing to comment on absolutely anything, to the point that you wouldn't be surprised to see him pull up beside you, roll down his window, and tell you what he'd had in his sandwich that lunchtime, how triffic it tasted, how happy he was with his sandwiches, before adding that while of course you should never comment on sandwiches belonging to other teams, Kenny Dalglish had a tidy little beef - and - horseradish number the other day, and you'd have to be mad not to appreciate it.

and we're kind of at the point where we have to have some of «the talks» on a number of fronts and I can totally see why parents sometimes shelter their kids forever.