It is tough to
see precise numbers under 100 but looking at the all - important blue chart it appears as if approximately 10 schools had a -25 % difference in their maths score this year.
Not exact matches
«It looks Homo - ish to me, but I'd like to
see their
numbers,» agrees Daniel Lieberman, a palaeoanthropologist at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, referring to
precise measurements of the jaw.
Your doctor
sees you at your most vulnerable (two words: paper gown) and is privy to your most intimate info (the
number of sexual partners you've had, the
precise location of that suspicious mole).
In the early stages I wasn't worried about getting
precise estimates of the
numbers of schools or the proportion of children in them, but rather wanted to
see if such schools even existed.
In the case of the above example, as well as discussing the exact wording of problems and
numbers to be used, the educators also spent time: anticipating student solutions, responses and questions; thinking about how they were going to organise and use space on their chalkboard (
seen in Japan as an important part of organising students» thinking and understanding); and discussing
precise lesson timings.
Psychological studies suggest that a round
number is
seen as more stable and solid than a more
precise figure.
As you can
see, in order for your dog to develop heartworm disease, a
number of things have to happen with near - perfect timing under a
precise set of circumstances.
When
seen from the air, the lines form
precise geometric shapes that
number in the hundreds, as well as 70 figures, which include a monkey, whale, hummingbird, shark, spiders, and plants.
As long as 1/3 of all emissions go unaccounted (
see the infamous «carbon missing sink»), there is no basis to state as
precise numbers as 5 % which seems to be plucked out of the air.
Allen and Annan seem to think it is a very
precise term that can only mean > 50 %, but if you asked a bunch of people or check a
number of definitions, I think you will
see it is indeed ambiguous and imprecise.
In a
number of cases, the Court held that individuals could only invoke such provisions which gave them rights before courts if the agreement at issue could as such be
seen as capable of having direct effect and if the provision at issue was sufficiently
precise and unconditional.