I think you're going to
see some lawyers write a couple posts a month.
You see some lawyers write three or four posts a week.
Not exact matches
«The TV industry and its viewers are about to
see a level of technical disruption that may be unprecedented,»
lawyers at the firm Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
wrote in a blog post after the auction concluded.
To start with, the
lawyer will get a complete
written life of loan history to
see all the charges and fees included in your mortgage balance.
For smaller games, we
see no reason for a funding agreement to be a massive document
written by
lawyers for
lawyers.
As has been
written about extensively (
see Steve McIntyre's post on the hypocrisy of The Times), the decision on publishing the e-mails directly in the paper was not made by me, but by Times
lawyers.
Kassie Siegel, the
lawyer for the Center for Biological Diversity, a group based in Arizona that took the lead in the lawsuit calling on the department to list the polar bear, added, «I don't
see how even this administration can
write this proposal without acknowledging that the primary threat to polar bears is global warming and without acknowledging the science of global warming.»
CommieBob
wrote: «By dint of superior
lawyering, I have often
seen the guilty exonerated and the innocent convicted.
Alice Woolley has
written thoughtfully about the questionable claims often contained in these letters and the important ethical questions raised by the practice of some «
lawyers sending out demand letters based on spurious claims in the hope of extracting funds because of the fear and ignorance of those who receive them» (
see, e.g., here, here and here).
The most powerful attorney facebook marketing that I have
seen is when a client or another
lawyer writes something on a
lawyer's wall or facebook page.
On Real
Lawyers Have Blogs, LexBlog CEO Kevin O'Keefe
writes that he has reviewed an advance copy of an ALM report called «FANS, FOLLOWERS AND CONNECTIONS: Social Media ROI for Law Firms» that documents the «definite» returns that law firms are
seeing from their investment in blogs and other social media.
Moreover, it seems odd that Mr Covaci would be entitled to help of an interpreter when he physically goes to the registry of the national court to orally object to the penalty order or when he sits down with a
lawyer to file a
written objection, but not when he wants to file a
written objection by himself from his home (
see also Opinion AG Bot, § 69).
This is not the worst contract I've
seen written by a non-
lawyer, and I expect to
see more people trying failing to create an enforceable contract because they think it will save them the money of hiring a
lawyer; I believe the theoretical aspect (not my specific situation, which is more of an example) will be generally useful for employers to be aware of what penalties their company may risk facing later on.
You
see it all the time in all kinds of
lawyer writing: self - consciously proper and priggishly formal articles that read like they're still being submitted for a term paper.
And now that these
lawyers have emptied those deep Roman Catholic pockets, Tillers
writes, «we can expect to
see — and I think we are
seeing — an increasing number of sex abuse lawsuits against Protestant clergy and churches, Jewish clergy and organizations, other religious organizations and their clergy... and — eventually — educators (regardless of religious persuasion) and those who employ educators.»
For «niche» blogs covering specialized areas of the law that aim primarily to, say, educate readers about new court decisions on a relevant topic, I don't
see why a ghostwriter with a strong legal research and
writing background can't do that effectively for a
lawyer simply too busy to do all the spadework.
While reading the Simple Justice blog today (it must have been an old post as I know I
wrote a fond «Farewell to «Simple Justice» and Scott Greenfield» post back in February 2012 when Simple Justice shut down), I
saw two references to young
lawyers who tried placing free ads on Craigslist but ultimately rejected this business development tactic as undignified.
Lawyers do well when they consider the fact that the judges they
write for are likely as savvy (or more savvy) than a typical
lawyer when it comes to
seeing through these smokescreens.
I will sometimes
write about challenges I am grappling with or with challenges I
see many
lawyers addressing.
This morning, Greenfield's buddy Brian Tannebaum (who along with Greenfield and Mark Bennett make up the «Three Angry
Lawyers» in this video)
wrote a post entitled, «
See Ya Greenfield» in which he bid Greenfield farewell.
You're going to
see some preeminent
lawyers writing once a month.
Ian Gallacher considered this question in his study of readability scores of briefs filed in New York's highest court from 1969 to 2008.244 Gallacher's study «was designed to reveal if the effects of systematic legal -
writing instruction in law schools could be
seen in documents
written by
lawyers.»
On May 20, Palazzo
wrote about the evolution of the
lawyers» place in society and the current effect on arbitration, saying: Perhaps more than any other professionals, attorneys have
seen their place...
unless this case goes to SCC it will be of no value to the rest of canada - a newsreel media story on Ivan Henrysaid «the judge intentionally labelled Henry vexatious so he would not have a chance to appeal to SCC - the SCC automatically reject the vexatious» i am trying to figure out how this is done - in my case the ns attorney general defence
lawyer had been on my case for years then one week before i sent in my SCC appeal books she
wrote me and said she had moved to the SCC office where my books would be ariving!!!!!!! i reported this to the SCC but my complaint was ignored - so did the NSAG
lawyer get ahold of my books and change them so SCC judges never
seen my arguements - thats how bad they do nt want SLR's to use the courts!!!!!!
Smart
lawyers include all that
written - off time on their bills; the clients can
see that they are paying for value (a common refrain by flat fee advocates), not to line the
lawyer's pockets.
Dean John Corkery of The John Marshall Law School in Chicago said that law firms would like to
see more (rather than less) emphasis on legal
writing, training to improve analytical skills, and training that would require
lawyers to work together well.
«The biggest minefield I
see is overworked or inattentive
lawyers failing to provide adequate direction and supervision, leaving the paralegal to figure things out on [their] own,» says Salt Lake City
lawyer Keith A. Call, who has
written about ethical issues involving paralegals in the Utah Bar Journal.
Boston Globe reporter Charlie Savage, in his Sunday article, Military
Lawyers See Limits on Trial Input,
writes:
This is a question I wonder about often in
writing this blog, as I
see vendors bring new products to market and wonder whether they are anything
lawyers really want.
The problem (if one
sees it as such) seems to be equal parts identity - based («a
lawyer is someone who has a secretary to do these things»); financial (there are more billables and disbursements in a dictated letter sent via regular mail and copied to file); and skills - based (
lawyers who actually don't know how to
write cogently).
Elefant
writes: «The bars» law practice management offices are one of the best developments that I've
seen to assist solo and small - firm
lawyers; those offices either didn't exist or were not as robust back in 1993 when I went solo.»
I was inspired to
write the column when, at the close of a seminar I chaired recently that covered, among other topics, legal Web logs, a
lawyer from the audience approached me and said, «I can
see the amusement value in these things, but I can't
see how they are of any use in a law practice.»
One of the best analyses I have
seen of Web logs as legal - marketing tools is Web Logs for
Lawyers: Lessons from Ernie the Attorney,
written by the esteemed Jerry Lawson and published on LLRX.com.
The highest rating of «AV» «applies to so many
lawyers in so many practices and jurisdictions that most large firms
see little value in brandishing it,» Lin
writes.
Every day I
see lawyers do things which make their
writing less persuasive, and thus less effective.
Some of it has happened sort of independently of what the
lawyers have actually been doing, and more having to do with how Google's getting smarter, and when we talk about specifically in local search, that's definitely played a big role, that Google has evolved to give much more localized and personalized results than they used to, and that's caused the effect of people in your local area being able to find local
lawyers, as opposed to if you
wrote about a consumer law post and somebody on the other side of the country finds it, now you're going to
see Google serving results for consumer
lawyers that are in the neighborhood, around the corner.
While the case has attracted enormous attention among patent
lawyers, most
see it as affecting «only a few atypical patent claims,» he
writes.
I
see «shall» used to mean all sorts of things in documents
lawyers write.
To me, I really
saw it at the time, 2012, as a real change only because for the first time we have it in
writing; it's sort of official and
lawyers have to do it.
But for
lawyers who are trying to build profile online through social networks or blogging, a well - stocked feed reader offers a constant stream of interesting, relevant content to blog or
write about, or share via social networks or personal emails of the «
Saw this and thought of you» variety.
Sorry but these bios don't make me want to meet these
lawyers as much as they make me want to check their
writing to
see if it matches the engaging copy - or if they just hired someone else to do it.
Lawyers don't try to
write enjoyably or memorably because they don't
see how it matters.
13
See infra notes 184 — 86, and accompanying text on how
lawyers may be judged harshly for poor public legal
writing just as they are judged for poor traditional legal
writing.
Christell: In many cases,
lawyers stick a without prejudice on every letter they
write, more times than not simply to add sting, as a badge of temerity or brashness, so much so that you will routinely
see it stamped or printed on letters clearly intended to be with prejudice, such as a letter which purports to confirm a settlement.
In addition to the lock - in Legal Week can also reveal that Plexus» parent company Parabis is set to
see further
lawyer exits and is looking to sell other parts of the business after its private equity investor
wrote down its stake to zero.
And we were thrilled to
see the decision that came down last week from the BC Court of Appeal - not least because one of the
lawyers arguing for the workers was our own Susanna Quail (ok, me, it's me Susanna
writing this).
This is where your adjuster's
written offer enters the equation — by
seeing how he or she arrived at the initial settlement figure, you and your
lawyer can break down the expenses of your case to negotiate a higher settlement amount.
I have
written several times here about the 2008 disappearance of Georgia
lawyer Elizabeth Calvert and her husband John from their yacht docked at Hilton Head, S.C. (
See prior posts here, here and here.)
And just to let the cat out of the bag, the
lawyer who broke the secret to the SmithyCode JACKIEFISHERWHOAREYOUDREADNOUGHT has
written his account of how he cracked it —
see http://books.guardian.co.uk/print/0,,329467468-116480,00.html from this morning's Guardian
As I
wrote on Law.com recently, I
see good reasons for
lawyers to use Twitter in their practices.