Sentences with phrase «see the evidence against»

Such feelings, Freud says, are often the unconscious basis for faith, and they were too strong in Dostoevsky to be overcome by his mind that saw the evidence against God so clearly.

David Miliband voted for the iraq war, for 90 days» detention without trial, which was defeated despite him, for setting control orders at the instance of the Secretary of State for Justice instead of the Lord Chief Justice and against giving suspects the right to see the evidence against them.

Kellner claims because he was granted «due process», by a Silver appointed judge, in an appeal of the first sanctions, and was granted the right to see the evidence against him, the new charges and sanctions were made out of spite.

Mendoza wrote that he wasn't able to see the evidence against him and was ordered to remain silent about the allegations.

They see evidence against their view, so they will a) go for the ad hominem maybe noting the poor credentials or the funding source b) find weaknesses in the studies but, there are weaknesses in all studies c) find another study that supports their own and say hey presto....

The bill of rights gives the accused the right to see the evidence against him and cross-examine his accusers before his life, liberty or property are put in jeopardy.

As soon as they see evidence against their client — the fossil fuel industry and those people making money off business - as - usual — they trash that evidence and bring forth whatever tidbits they can find to confuse the judge and jury.

«Despite assuring Congress that career military lawyers are helping design new trials for accused terrorists, the Bush administration has limited their input on their key request, that any tribunals must give detainees the right to see the evidence against them, officials said.»

Until you have seen the evidence against you, you should not plead guilty.

As such, any evidence that could be in the defense's favor must be revealed to the defense (the defense is entitled to see all evidence against the accused that will be used in trial... and need not turn over evidence that supports the prosecution).

And they're entitled to see the evidence against them....

Not exact matches

«I am very clear that we will take action against those where there are allegations that we see, and the evidence is there, that there has been misconduct,» May told lawmakers.

I see no evidence that discrimination against any of those groups is condoned.

There is ample evidence for the existence of God, what you decide to do with this evidence is ultimately up to you, but do not claim that there is none... and I would submit to you that many people believe many things without evidence every single day... but do not lump all people of faith into one basket... I have personal proof that God exists, but proof for me may not be proof for you, some people can see something with their own eyes and still deny it, that is why I said it is ultimately up to you to decide what you believe... there is much evidence both for and against the existence of God, you need to decide which evidence you choose to believe...

Many of us see these identical dynamics being used against Julie, and the evidence seems quite compelling, overwhelming in fact.

The juxtaposition of Orwell's book and the Barmen anniversary is important, for if we are to stand against those evidences of the Orwellian world that we already see, important resources for doing so will be found in the stance, Conviction and courage of the creators of Barmen.

Even more to the point you have Hitler, a man who evoked god countless times in his speeches, had the nazis were belt buckles that said «God with us» and you see this as mountains of evidence AGAINST him being a christian?

Seeing such divergence as evidence against Christianity is based upon the Protestant - Islamic view of scripture (and in any case the gap is gradually closing).

In Africa, we see evidence of its considerable gains in spite of what we might regard as insuperable odds against a nontranslatable Scripture.

See they can teach evolution in schools, not due it being a conspiracy against the poor persecuted christards like you but due to it being based on solid acceptable evidence... regardless of how stupid you may wish to continue to be on the subject, you don't change the facts.

As for mine, with all the reaction that has often been in evidence, I see the basic action of the churches as against reaction and for progress.

Yet, against all reason and evidence, there are those who insist that the world is flat or that they have seen Elvis Presley or been captured by space aliens.

Thus he saw modern cosmology and biological evolution as evidence in favour of God, not against.

I applaud Atheists for their challenging Christians for their beliefs, but there is a completely untapped source of evidence against the existence of their God... the daily life of the Christian (as can be seen to a small extent in a blog like this.

If there is a war against christianity, it is between christian extremists and those «who require evidence prior to believing», and seeing as how there is no evidence supporting creation by an almighty whatever, and that there is tons of evidence supporting evolution, the most effective weapon in the «war» is the utter stupidity that keeps emanating from the mouths of christian loudmouths.

And even Blackmun might have come to see that his argument could not have stood up against the array of empirical evidence that formed that brief for the state of Texas.

= > well good to see you understand that the odds of being right about the family are stacked against you based on your evidence and best tools available for testing.

What really galls me is that Wenger gets paid 8 million a year to manage a side and yet even the lowest paid bin man who is an arsenal fan can see that OG and Theo are NOT nor will they EVER be up to scratch un yet Wenger persisits against all the evidence because he so desperately wants to prove the world wrong about either or both of the afore mentioned.

This is clear evidence why the BPL is so hard to win, any team can beat any team on a good day we must respect all our opponents because every game is difficult like we saw yesterday against Palace!

The present squad is just not good enough and the evidence was there for all to see on Saturday against Chelsea.

I didn't see anybody argue against that logical theory, or ask for evidence, or call it a «conspiracy theory».

The against DLo / Okafor camp sees evidence from both players being traded within a year of two from being top 3 picks, and for the most part in the history of the NBA these recent top 3 picks unless traded for all stars calibre players, all tend to eventually be busts or underperformers.

On the playing side the club has battled manfully to get themselves out of the relegation dogfight, as evidenced by last nights last gasp point against Sunderland, it will take a few more such battles to see them make their way our of trouble but I have a sneaky feeling that they could pull off a Houdini.

His extra fitness work seems to have paid dividends as evidenced by a frightening turn of pace against Club Brugge which not only broke down a clear cut chance for the opposition, but sprung a ferocious counter attack which almost saw Depay complete his hat - trick in style after a delightful flick from Rooney after Shaw's cross.

As far back as our very first friendly of pre-season against Adelaide United, you could see that the senior members of the squad looked fired up and ready to answer their critics and, on the evidence of the first two matches of 15/16, that's certainly the case.

We saw fine evidence of this on the final day of last season when he ran through 1v1 against Hugo Lloris to make a hash of the chance.

I saw West Ham against Hull last week and thought they were very nervy, anxious and there was evidence of that again against Swansea.

Pseudoscience never sees the need to change, no matter how much evidence piles up against a theory.

I was DEAD SET against cosleeping before I had my son — I had seen all the literature on the risks and the supposed «evidence» about how it was SOOOO much more dangerous than a crib.

At the League Against Cruel Sports, we rely on facts and evidence to back up our campaigns, so our investigators took some secret footage to see for themselves if snare operators were following the Code of Practice.

* State prosecutors pursing bribery and corruption charges against G. Steven Pigeon saw their case improve today when a judge reversed an earlier decision to suppress email evidence that they believe incriminates the once - powerful political operative

In a submission to the House of Lords Constitution Committee's inquiry into the passage of legislation through Parliament, the CIOT proposes: · The Finance Bill Public Bill Committee takes oral evidence from tax experts and others; · More effective liaison between select committees and the Finance Bill committee; · Increasing the resources available to Parliament for scrutinising tax matters; · Using technology to make it easier for those outside Parliament to comment on Bills, e.g. an online facility to input comments by clause numbers, so MPs can see who says what against each clause; · Asking the Office of Tax Simplification to publish simplification assessments of new tax proposals.

Speaking after seeing the green paper on justice and security, Ken Macdonald said the plans would allow the government to use evidence against individuals which they were not be able to see or challenge.

(U.S. attorney Preet Bharara told The Buffalo News that he has seen evidence of corruption across New York state, and his current probes could lead to cases to against upstate lawmakers.

«If you are asking if I saw any evidence that David Cameron was prepared to grapple with this — none,» said Clegg, claiming he came up against the same lack of interest from the chancellor, George Osborne.

Creel's paper was seen as damning evidence against wolves, but his results were based on indirect observations.

In fact, until quite recently, geologists were conditioned against seeing any evidence of major crises.

This can include identifying microscopic amounts of blood, saliva or semen on evidence; carrying out a DNA analysis on any samples found and comparing the resulting profile against the UK's DNA Database; or using microscopy to see if two fibres have similar characteristics.

Heat trapping greenhouse - gas emissions are the obvious culprit, since they've increased dramatically over that same 50 years, but scientists prefer hard evidence to presumption, so a team from the British Antarctic Survey has been drilling into ancient ice to see how the current warming stacks up against what happened in the ancient past.

De Souza offered the same advice: «I would caution against ignoring strong and consistent evidence that we already have that shows that if we reduce saturated fat and replace it with healthful unsaturated fats, like olive oil and canola oil, we do see benefits in terms of reducing cholesterol levels and heart disease risk.»