Sentences with phrase «see the evidence book»

But the head needs to go down so that the eyes can see the evidence book.

Not exact matches

Now, if you're a Mormon, you see this as strong evidence the Book of Mormon is what Joseph Smith said it was.

Without the use of religion you'd have no reason to deny the evidence but as long as you have that book that you require to get by in this world, you will never see the facts for what they are.

It is far easier to folow the history and see why your book, your god, and the NT needed to be created, BY MEN... no evidence of divine inspiration... a line showing the previous cultures your story was taken from, and one can see where the wisdom of men was incorporated... just in your version it is not mans wisdom, but something from some deity (who until the NT was a very vindictive, murderous, egotistical god), who suddenly is all love and flowers.

When Ezra cries, «Thou our God hast punished us less than our iniquities deserve,» (Daniel 9:16) or a prayer in the Book of Nehemiah says, «Thou art just in all that is come upon us; for thou hast dealt truly, but we have done wickedly,» (Nehemiah 9:33) or Daniel exhausts tautology in confessing, «We have sinned, and have dealt perversely, and have done wickedly, and have rebelled,» (Daniel 9:5) we see the self - accusation which resulted from the acceptance of national misfortune not as an evidence of Yahweh's weakness in protecting his people but as proof of his inflexible righteousness.

Some evidence for this is seen in the fact that the Book of Life is sometimes referred to as the Lamb's Book of Life (e.g., Rev 21:27).

The juxtaposition of Orwell's book and the Barmen anniversary is important, for if we are to stand against those evidences of the Orwellian world that we already see, important resources for doing so will be found in the stance, Conviction and courage of the creators of Barmen.

I've seen enough archeological evidence to support the claims of the Book of Mormon that the people that lived in the ancient America's really did exist when and how the book descriBook of Mormon that the people that lived in the ancient America's really did exist when and how the book describook describes.

See the diffidence concerning the ability of modern knowledge of nature to be convincing evidence for God referred to in our review of Paul Haffner's quality book and our Cutting Edge column, as well its presence on our Letters» page.

belief in anything without supporting evidence is a childrens game... We teach our children not to lie, judge a book by its cover, or to take anything at face value or to just believe without questioning... you know, we say stuff like check the source and don't believe everything you see / hear... should we teach seeking knowledge or to have faith in without?

So I did hours and hours of research, reading books, etc. to see if there could be any evidence to support Creationism / Intelligent Design.

See John P. McTernan's book as America has done to Israel to see the vast amount of evidenSee John P. McTernan's book as America has done to Israel to see the vast amount of evidensee the vast amount of evidence.

I saw in Mohler's review of the book yet another illustration of what I have described here; for as Mohler related the book's argument, there was precious little appeal to evidence, and considerably more to morality and emotion.

Robespierre's address to the Commune of Paris at the convention of 1793 evidences that his Supreme Being also had this same character: «L'homme pervers se croit sans cesse environné d'un témoin puissant et terrible anquel il ne peut échapper, qui le voit et le veille, tandis que les hommes sont livrés au sommeil...» (F. A. Aulard, Le Culte de la raison et le culte de l'Être Supreme (Paris, 1892), pp. 285 f.) How can one isolate this «structure» and separate it from its biblical antecedents, when — to cite only one of the many passages — one can read in the book of Isaiah (29:15): «Woe to those who hide deep from the Lord their counsel, whose deeds are in the dark, and who say, «Who sees us?

As people are seeing through the lies and stupidity of ancient books with no evidence to support their claims.

In reality, this will be yet more evidence that morality comes from humans, not books, but none of the Christians who undergo this shift will see it that way.

' Lets see a guy sits down writes a book proclaims it to be the absolute truth offeres ZERO evidence to it being anything but a fairy tail & from it a Religion is born» Yep, and they called it christianity.

Lets see a guy sits down writes a book proclaims it to be the absolute truth offeres ZERO evidence to it being anything but a fairy tail & from it a Religion is born.

«Well - presented, honest and evidence - based — this is the first book I have seen that translates scientific insights into a usable form for parents.

If you are a health provider who routinely gives newborns supplemental formula, read this book and see if the evidence changes the way you practice.

As an example, see C.J. Werleman's «Atheists Can't Be Republicans: If Facts and Evidence Matter» book; or at Salon; or nearly every single politics - touching blog entry on Patheos's Atheism channel.

As you'll see when you get our book, we give great weight to avoiding toxic compounds in plant foods, but have no strong recommendations about vegetables — we recommend eating them to taste, since the evidence suggests their health impact is minimal, not clearly positive or negative.

The first dating book I've ever seen that is backed up by scientific evidence.

The research also found that although Ofsted says that its inspectors do not expect «particular frequency or quantity of work in pupil's books», 34 per cent were asked to see this type of evidence.

They can then stick it in their books and you can return to see it or show it as evidence any time!

As Boser demonstrates, the evidence is strong that we learn more, and more quickly, under the conditions reflected in the book's six themes: Learning improves when we see value in what we are learning; when it is focused on an identifiable skill or cluster of information (target); when it develops in a sequence from simpler to complex; and when the new material is processed in ways that connect to current knowledge or skills by extension, association, or rehearsal in some form (extend, relate, rethink).

Again, I can't summarize the research that lead to this conclusion (read the book and see what you think) but basically Haidt lays out a case that says if you believe that you are some sort of scientist guided solely by sweet reason and evidence, you are the victim of self - delusion.

In each video, you'll see teachers implementing the four domains of effective practice from the book, as well as lesson planning conferences between the teacher and principal, professional evidence - based classroom observations, and teacher reflections on the lesson taught.

(See my review of this evidence in pp. 31 - 34 of my 2014 book, From Preschool to Prosperity.)

This category name is often mistakenly seen as synonymous with «lots of graphic sex scenes,» but these two books provide solid counter evidence to this claim, as neither book contains any consensual sex at all between so - called «new adults.»)

I've seen some evidence of my own books being positively impacted, but didn't pay attention to sales ranking before KU.

Despite the evidence around them that Britain is preparing for war against Germany, Mattie, once a suffragette and a woman with her own ideas about government and education, doesn't sign Noel up for evacuation from London (see «Beyond the Book»).

There is anecdotal evidence suggesting that stores are shifting their attention to books that need to be seen and touched to be purchased: adult illustrated books and children's books.

You will now be using statements such as; as so and so said in so and so's book we see that this is so, and that is so; therefore, with convincing evidence of so and so, we have come to the conclusion that so and so is such.

I saw some evidence recently that if you're ranked 100,000 in Amazon bestseller that means your book is selling about 7 to 16 copies a week.

He added: «There's an argument that you sometimes see that «a download is not equal to a lost sale, because that person wouldn't have bought it anyway», and there's varying evidence on that, but it's very much a static analysis of a dynamic problem, because if you normalise the practice of pirating books, you erode incentive for people to pay for them, so eventually, people who would have bought them stop doing so.»

Must - see webinar: «Evidence for Indies — Exploring the Library Journal Self - Published Book Survey Report» Now includes full Q&A transcript!

And since every major study I've seen has shown lack of DRM to be a wash or beneficial to sales (across the music and book industries), it falls upon the pro-DRM crowd to show any evidence to back up their fear - mongering.

[Though it's worth highlighting here: We've seen One51 record exceptional gains in the past 2 years (in the single - digit millions), but I see no evidence of any kind of systematic or pervasive manipulation of its current book values.]

You will see evidence (photos, books, possible awards) of long term interest and activity in the breed.

So you can see that there will be absolutely no evidence of the tsunami if you book your diving adventure with us.

There was always a tension between the seen and the imagined, but as he moved into the 80s and 90s, the free play of ideas, as evidenced in the pages of the drawing books, became more personal and less programmatic.

If you read my book you'll see evidence that the devastating 21st century heat waves in Russia and Europe can not be attributed to climate change, but are due to well understood natural forces that have produced even worse heat waves in the past.

We see in you no evidence of foundation for your assertion of how much reduction in CO2 emission may be possible, and if you can construct a valid model for how climate factors determine CO2 levels then you've gone farther than all of science — an astounding feat worthy of a comic book supervillain indeed.

And you show no concern whatsoever that this famous bit of «smoking gun» evidence is literally never seen in any accusers» books, magazine articles, PPT presentations, or web sites that rely on it as proof for their accusation that skeptic scientists are untrustworthy?

``... And you show no concern whatsoever that this famous bit of «smoking gun» evidence is never seen in any accuser's books, magazine qrticles, PPT presentations or websites that RELY ON IT AS PROOF for their accusation that skeptic scientists are untrustworthy?»

Having read both books, seen Donna speak at a previous Westminster meeting and met her at the pub event following the recent Committee on Energy Climate Change session where she gave evidence alongside Richard Lindzen, I would say that our UK MPs really ought to read her books and listen very closely to what she has to say and take her seriously.

The first link in my article takes readers to a prior one where I show how the very same Sheldon Rampton appeared before a US House hearing and regurgitated an accusation phrase against skeptic scientists that was made famous by anti-skeptic book author Ross Gelbspan and the enviro - advocacy group Ozone Action in 1996 - 7 — these people have every appearance of being the epicenter of the accusation that skeptic scientists operate under a coal / oil industry directive to fabricate false assessments in exchange for mega-millions...... an accusation that has no evidence to support it that I can find, and its central piece of evidence is a 1991 coal industry memo that no one is allowed to see in its complete context.

Such proof of «systems integrity» provisions are in 11 of the 14 Evidence Acts in Canada, including Book 7 of the Civil Code of Quebec, see: articles 2820, 2838 - 2842, and 2860, and, An Act to Establish a Legal Framework for Information Technology, ss.

The work of epidemiologists Wilkinson and Pickett (2009) has illuminated the impact of this rise in inequality bringing an array of evidence in their book, The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Always do Better, to reach conclusions that have been the subject of considerable debate and critique (for a good review see Rowlingson, 2011).