Sentences with phrase «see the evidence upon»

Not exact matches

Sean Duffy, Omada's CEO, says he looked around and saw all these programs that «weren't built upon a ton of medical evidence.

An actual supernatural thing would, for us to interact with it in any way, be required to impinge upon this space - time continuum, and we see that, regardless of scale, i.e. microscopic or macroscopic, there is absolutely zero evidence that there is anything interacting with us or our universe in any way.

In fact atheists don't have an ideology — they see no evidence for the claims upon which your ideology is built.

When Ezra cries, «Thou our God hast punished us less than our iniquities deserve,» (Daniel 9:16) or a prayer in the Book of Nehemiah says, «Thou art just in all that is come upon us; for thou hast dealt truly, but we have done wickedly,» (Nehemiah 9:33) or Daniel exhausts tautology in confessing, «We have sinned, and have dealt perversely, and have done wickedly, and have rebelled,» (Daniel 9:5) we see the self - accusation which resulted from the acceptance of national misfortune not as an evidence of Yahweh's weakness in protecting his people but as proof of his inflexible righteousness.

Evidence of the fact that union differentiates is to be seen all round us — in the bodies of all higher forms of life, in which the cells become almost infinitely complicated according to the variety of tasks they have to perform; in animal associations, where the individual «polymerises» itself, one might say, according to the function it is called upon to fulfil; in human societies, where the growth of specialization becomes ever more intense; and in the field of personal relationships, where friends and lovers can only discover all that is in their minds and hearts by communicating them to one another.

That's only useful when you need to rely upon talking people into seeing your point of view, and people with evidence on their side really shouldn't have to do that.

Seeing such divergence as evidence against Christianity is based upon the Protestant - Islamic view of scripture (and in any case the gap is gradually closing).

We have recently seen the extraordinary and unprecedented inauguration of a new President following hard upon the resignation of a President who gave us clear and convincing evidence of his own criminality.

It is sad to say that we would be more likely to beat our opposition when playing away from home, Of course this is purely an opinion and an opinion based upon the evidence seen on a television 1000 miles from the Emirates.

The multi-society letter called on the OMB to work with leaders of government agencies to back the use of the best scientific evidence in their decision - making and to see that federal agencies support scientists doing the work required to «produce the knowledge upon which the nation relies.»

This study complements an fMRI study that demonstrated activation to the hippocampus during this technique, and elaborates upon the application of Kundalini yoga and meditation for psychiatric symptoms, as evidenced by a randomized controlled trial for OCD that outshines most if not all industry - funded pharmaceutical trials I have seen.

It should be noted, though, that we as a nation have been relying upon similar high - stakes educational policies since the late 1970s (i.e., for now over 35 years); however, we have literally no research evidence that these high - stakes accountability policies have yielded any of their intended effects, as still perpetually conceptualized (see, for example, Nevada's recent legislative ruling here) and as still advanced via large - and small - scale educational policies (e.g., we are still A Nation At Risk in terms of our global competitiveness).

I see that you are correct and that Success For All is in primary schools as well as middle schools, but this indicates that there is already evidence that children should be placed in classes based upon their current abilities and skills works in the primary school.

And since every major study I've seen has shown lack of DRM to be a wash or beneficial to sales (across the music and book industries), it falls upon the pro-DRM crowd to show any evidence to back up their fear - mongering.

Upon closer examination you will be able to see evidence of very slow breathing in a hibernating hamster and even minor twitching of his whiskers, which is a sure sign that he is still alive.

I'm sorry, but you're line of thinking about this seems to be a bit personal as I've seen no real evidence to suggest the format of its release has anything to do with its content upon final release.

In the meantime the study was quickly seized upon by those seeking to sow doubt in the validity behind the scientific consensus concerning the evidence for human - induced climate change (see news articles in the New York Times, and Wall Street Journal).

The evidence of climate change is so abundant and clear but people everywhere are not seeing it and, tberefore, not insisting upon adequate action.

For example, understanding that global warming is not a proven science and that there is no circumstantial evidence for global warming alarmism — which is why we see goats like political charlatans like Al Gore showing debunked graphs like the «hockey stick» to scare the folks — and, not understanding that climate change the usual thing not the unusual thing and that the climate change we observed can be explained by natural causes is the only thing that really separates we the people from superstitious and ignorant government - funded schoolteachers on the issue of global warming... that and the fact that global warming alarmists do not believe in the scientific method nor most of the principles upon which the country was founded.

If we can see ourselves to be «the problem», then it is incumbent upon us to bring forward the best available evidence from science, especially when that evidence happens to relate directly to why we are pursuing a soon to become, patently unsustainable (superhigh) way of life.

Since to me (and many scientists, although some wanted a lot more corroborative evidence, which they've also gotten) it makes absolutely no sense to presume that the earth would just go about its merry way and keep the climate nice and relatively stable for us (though this rare actual climate scientist pseudo skeptic seems to think it would, based upon some non scientific belief — see second half of this piece), when the earth changes climate easily as it is, climate is ultimately an expression of energy, it is stabilized (right now) by the oceans and ice sheets, and increasing the number of long term thermal radiation / heat energy absorbing and re radiating molecules to levels not seen on earth in several million years would add an enormous influx of energy to the lower atmosphere earth system, which would mildly warm the air and increasingly transfer energy to the earth over time, which in turn would start to alter those stabilizing systems (and which, with increasing ocean energy retention and accelerating polar ice sheet melting at both ends of the globe, is exactly what we've been seeing) and start to reinforce the same process until a new stases would be reached well after the atmospheric levels of ghg has stabilized.

The means of detecting judgements that are unjust because of the unappealable inadequacies of the evidence upon which they are based are very poor, and therefore instances wherein they are detected are rare and unusual — see for example: R. v. Hanemaayer, 2008 ONCA 580, 234 C.C.C. (3d) 3.

There is a price to be paid in necessary legal infrastructure of laws and courts if it is to provide adequate controls and safeguards for the technology upon which our lives are dependent and judges» decision are based; see: «Guilt By Mobile Phone Tracking Shouldn't Make «Evidence to the Contrary» Impossible» (pdf.; and see the summary, using the same title on Slaw, October 4, 2016).

The court has, in many cases, been prepared to hear argument and see evidence from them (usually on limited issues) and has also been prepared to consider costs awards against them and in their favour depending upon the outcome of their involvement.

See e.g., these 2 voir dire, murder trial decisions: R. v. Oland 2015 NBQB 245 (the data admissibility decision), & 244 (the opinion evidence admissibility decision based upon the data's admissibility).

[31] That does not say that Dr. Malcolm can not give, in evidence, his opinion based upon the results of his testing, nor does it prevent Dr. Malcolm from giving an opinion on whether the test results as evaluated by him are of a nature, kind, or quality seen in people who have been diagnosed as having had organic brain injuries.

With respect to the «adult industry» stream, the Court of Appeal found no palpable and overriding error of fact or an extricable error of law in the Trial Judge's reasons: «In our view, there was evidence in the record to support the trial judge's findings and we see no basis upon which this court should interfere with respect to the adult stream.»

If the evidence can never be sufficient evidence to support a conviction, then the evidence can not be seen as some evidence upon which a properly instructed acting reasonably could convict.

57 of them, including 19 Queen's Counsel, say the proposals «represent a departure from the foundational principle of natural justice that all parties are entitled to see and challenge all the evidence relied upon before the court and to combat that evidence by calling evidence of their own.»

Government proposals to increase the number of court hearings held in secret, and in which parties can only see minimal evidence relied upon by the court, have been severely criticised by the «Special Advocates» who play the central role in closed hearings.

represent a departure from the foundational principle of natural justice that all parties are entitled to see and challenge all the evidence relied upon before the court and to combat that evidence by calling evidence of their own.

To put it another way, I do not see any justification, on the evidence before me, for not imposing upon Mr. Young the same obligation to seek employment as would apply to a payor spouse whose employment contract has been terminated through notice.

The court went on to highlight a further problem with any evidence that is judicially noted — that «the defence had no opportunity to see the extra-curial evidence, to cross-examine upon it or to lead other evidence relevant to it.»

This very varied evidentiary legislation situation, will produce a very inconsistent caselaw, one jurisdiction to the next, once judges and lawyers realize the consequences in law required by the fundamental difference between an electronic record and a pre-electronic paper record — in particular, the «system integrity concept» that is expressly stated in the electronic records provisions; e.g.: s. 34.1 (5), (5.1) of the Ontario Evidence Act; and, s. 31.2 (1) of the Canada Evidence Act (see my Slaw blog article, «The Dependence of Electronic Discovery and Admissibility upon Electronic Records Management,» published Nov. 22, 2013).

While we've seen some evidence suggesting that Google's been preparing for a couple new Nexus models, these rumors of Android Silver have cast new doubt upon whether or not we'll actually see the commercial release of that hardware.

See also the emphasis on «equal and due treatment» in the Canadian Supreme Court's recent discussion of placing «due weight on Aboriginal perspectives» and ensuring its supporting evidence an «equal footing» in Mitchell v Minister of Natural Revenue [2001] 1 SCR 911, relied upon the State of Victoria in the present appeal as correctly setting out the applicable approach: Written Submissions of the First Respondent (State of Victoria), at 16.

Parenting coordination advocates of late have been busily setting about to create satisfaction surveys (not unlike the self - serving «evidence» that we saw upon the implementation of mandatory parenting class programs).

An appeal is used to see if a lower court made a mistake based upon the evidence presented.