I am a firm believer in God and his love for all his children, but, I also
see the other side meaning the Devil, who's presents are becoming more and more seen as we pull further away.
Not exact matches
Whether in private conversation, group discussion, a sermon or a speech, or in the interaction within the community, the question is whether there is, on the one
side, conviction about what the gospel
means and, on the
other side, unqualified readiness to hear the
other people and
see the world from their point of view.
Just because evil is always relative does not
mean we as humans can not
see ourselves in
others and share that with them, letting them know we can relate, that we feel the relative evil as well and attempt to support those in harms way by saying «I am you too, i'm on your
side.»
(Cf.. The
Meaning of Human Existence, pp. 85 - 93) Particularly important in this relationship is what Buber has variously called «
seeing the
other,» «experiencing the
other side,» «inclusion,» and «making the
other present.»
The striking parallel between this conception and Buber's concepts of «
seeing the
other,» «experiencing the
other side,» and «making the
other present» is strengthened by Roger's descriptions of what
seeing through the client's eyes actually
means.
ok i've decided — after soul searching and observing my and
other's reactions to these religious blog news on CNN learning more about religion from this alone and about the mideast than from anywhere else in my USA educated life i need to be more tolerant of
others having religious based governments THAT is what is confusing me — that religion are governments are not seperated that is hard for much of USA population to understand perhaps it is for me i think you would have to actually live in a society like the mideast to truly understand it i
mean — actually be part of the society the religious part is truly offputting — since most in USA seperate church and state like — church is for faith and imagination and celebration and family and community involvement and state is for protection and education and health and infrastructure, etc., for all it is hard to be serious about religion — when the serious
side of society is state it is hard to
see religion being the serious
side of enforcement — and the state enforcing the faith based
side of society egad — doesn't god get lost in all that?
Jung has
seen that psychologically this
means that an overemphasis on either
side of a polarity such as conscious - unconscious, or sacred - profane, will lead not to a dialectical coincidentia oppositorum but to a reinforcement or enantiodromia of the (untransfigured)
other pole, that is, to an inundation or regression.17 It will be helpful to keep these Jungian motifs in mind as we explore the somewhat surprising parallels between Jung's notion of «individuation» and Altizer's idea of an ongoing kenotic incarnation.
If you
see a problem of either
side demonizing the
other, like Richard has, by all
means, lets be civil and human in all things, to all people.
On one
side you have Tolstoi saying, «Where love is, there God is also»; and on the
other side is Joseph Wood Krutch, one of the finest nontheistic humanists of our time, who,
seeing in goodness no revelation of the Eternal, says about man, «There is no reason to suppose that his own life has any more
meaning than the life of the humblest insect that crawls from one annihilation to another.»
It is a disgrace when you are able to be complete and always you come short, it grows frustration among fans, pundits, and everyone who bet on you...
Other so called big teams manged to fulfill their expectations and potential, I
mean city, chelsea and man city, and that's why the media stands by their
sides, however, our management either has ego or ignorance so much that they decline everyone call to stand as a big club and fix their flaws... Now the pundits and the media wait for us to slip and then say «
see we told you»...
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have
seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've
seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right
side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I
see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've
seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the
means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this
side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the
other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
They want to
see a positive vision of what it would
mean if the UK voted to leave or remain — at the moment, both
sides are just painting a negative picture of the
other.
On the
other side of things, it's great
seeing the Somos leadership tapping into technology and launching in new
means of promoting the hard work that actually goes on.
Perhaps people
mean the 1980s when Iran - Contra
saw shady arms deals with Iran on
side of the Atlantic, and Oregreave, Hillsborough and Westland on the
other?
Disney said the precise binding of Targapremir - 18a to microRNA - 18a
means a cancer drug that follows this strategy would be likely to kill prostate cancer cells without causing the broader
side effects
seen with many
other cancer therapies.
I
mean we have an account from Thomas Digges sort of written much later saying, «Yeah, my dad, you know, back in the day» — I'm paraphrasing — «Back in the day my dad was doing these things with tubes and pieces of glass and, you know, he could
see a coin that we placed out in the field and he could, you know, read the lettering on the entrance to the church on the
other side of town.»
PETA may seem well -
meaning and benign, but scientists and conservationists who work with animals
see its
other side and are wary of the organization because it attacks research in order to advance its mission.
Old spirit, wise, knowledge, calm and firm, enjoyable, humor through my eyes are beyond most, I think and
see in a visual mathematics way which
means I can
see the
other side of the picture in full detail, goals i...
«And ultimately because the movie
means so much to us and
seeing each
other in a professional realm and also allowing that sort of new
side that we
saw in each
other was really bonding, it was like very cool.»
To help fill the gaps for participants, sessions included exploring what leadership really
means, understanding the process of policy analysis, figuring out how to get
others to
see all
sides of an issue, figuring out how to effectively use research - based evidence, strategizing how to get quality teaching even without resources, and learning how to use the media to communicate a vision.
Let me start by saying that, Kyle is the best he was working for me,
meaning that he call me every 30 days to
see if I was ready to come in, this wen... t on for about a year, finely he
seen a white Mercedes, he email and he call me he said can't let this car get away from you come on in let's get you in it, I really want to wait but I said ok it's been a year let's do it, so I went and guess what I have my c300 and I love it i love it, the
other staff members was great as well, even the head boss come out
side and introduce him self, so Kyle please keep the great work, I will be back oh and the price was great they really work with you..
By «square» I don't
mean boring — rather I
mean that it utilizes ALL the space Amazon allocates for the image, thereby making the cover image «bigger» than
other cover images within search results, or even within Listmania or Guide listings (
see the image of Sell Your Book on Amazon along the left - hand
side of our screen shot for an example).
First, it is
meant to equal the playing field for all parties, so as not to
see one
side greatly financially disadvantaged over the
other spouse.
Just like Playa de Puerto Rico, Puerto de Mogan is also well protected on one
side by a harbour wall and a rocky breakwater on the
other side, which
means the shore never
sees rough waves.
Other circuits such as Death Wind
saw the player being blown; this
meant taking the
side wind straights in a zig - zagging motion while turning into the headwind or vice versa had the appropriate effect on handling.
Not that I don't enjoy practicing law by any
means, but that is, if you ask me, I'm much more interested in building successful businesses throughout the course of my life whatever those look like and right now happens to be a law firm working in family law and, like I said, I enjoy it, but at the end of the day, I'd love to not have the revenue generation rely on me so I can do more of that
other, but until we
see those scales tip, the majority of my work will still be on the client
side and the billing
side.
Seeing issues from both
sides means we are able to develop the solutions our clients need while still reaching an agreement with the
other parties involved.