Sentences with phrase «see the point yet»

Do you see my point yet?

I understand that it can be useful for active people who exercise around 4 times a week, but other than that, I don't really see the point yet.

They have the card and are using it, but I haven't seen any points yet.

Not exact matches

One reason rejection rates are so high is that most of the companies that prospective funders see haven't gotten anywhere near that point just yet.

There are always articles stating that the DED and free zone authorities and banks love SMEs, but I have to yet to see the love for smes from a financial point of view.

Yet I've also remarked how most evidence I see still points to late - cycle not end - cycle.

Bonds seem as yet unable to see what the fuss is all about, but at this point it is important to ask ourselves whether the equity market sell - off is going to bleed into the fixed income world anytime soon.

It is therefore not yet clear (although clarity could develop in the coming weeks) that we are at a tipping point from which we will see bond yields march dramatically higher.

Just about every year in the past 30 years, we've seen the market pull back some 5 % at some point, and we haven't yet seen that type of action this year.

Coal fell to just 27.6 % of US utility - scale power generation in December, and the spread between it and natural gas - fired generation widened to 616 basis points, the largest yet seen, Continue Reading

If you look at Page 3 of C's Y - 9 performance report, you'll see that C's yield on loans is 2 % higher than the large bank peer group, yet the bank has a spread on earning assets half a point lower than other large banks.

Charles: Right, I think that's a huge demographic question that I haven't seen any really good statistics on because of course most of the boomers are still in their late 50s or 60s, early 70s and they're not yet to the point where the older generation like the boomer parents, the so - called silent generation, which has sold their houses or given them to their offspring, their adult children.

Although people understood the rules of open book management, at first they didn't see the point of adding yet another meeting to their busy schedules.

@fimeilleur actually i can back up the claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.

---- Bob, just pointing out that though you hadn't seen the sign yet, I did see the sign.

He actually includes the very bit that disproves his supposed «point» (here the «in the sense that Christianity requires,») and yet still either can't see it or thinks everyone else is so dim - witted they can't.

Yet at every point it must be read in reference to the culture within which it emerged, so that its «situation - conditioned» and temporal elements may be seen in their true perspective.

He was vulnerable at many points, as we are now able to see; for the art of thinking forward, as we live forward, 13 or of perceiving holistically, or relationally, not only was as yet undeveloped but hardly acknowledged as being legitimate in Western thought during Bergson's earlier years when he wrote Creative Evolution (1911).

I have yet to see any proof of a god, and most of this nonsense is about their god, so at some point their arguments or lack of them will always have that one huge hole in them.

I am yet to see you challenge anyone of the points I made so far!

Our confusion then may be caused, as the good Bishop Berkeley put it regarding another matter, that we «raise a dust and then complain we can not see»; yet it is also due at points to a real lack of consistency in what the records tell us Jesus taught.

So its ok for him to prove his points (which btw science can not prove something to be real when it comes to THEORIES which is what evolution is, which i believe to be true), yet when someone wants to believe in something that they see points to proof in thats not ok?

Glad to see you've spent those 65 years developing keen an4lytical skills; the fact that you've been around this long yet can still acheive this level of flagrant ignorance pretty much proves my point.

In the event a fellow minister sees the «outline», however, one should be prepared for comments reflecting surprise, curiosity, and maybe jests about the poverty of thought in «points» entitled «However» and «Yet perhaps».

yet, where the christian extremists are anywhere near as bad at this point as the muslim extremists, but it looks like it is coming from what I can see from all of the extremist hate - filled posts by a lot of people posting on this and any other article about muslims.

Yet as we look at each of the Five Points in more detail in subsequent posts, we will make room for other Calvinistic voices to be heard as well, and as we look at the biblical passages they use to defend their theology, we will see that Calvinism may not be as reasonable or biblical as it first appears.

Shadowflash, I don't recall your response to any of my posts... I usually do recall them... But I do agree with one thing you said... «human mind hates being wrong» But I see it differently then you do... I see human mind and human understanding being the stumbling block and point of pride, which prevents man from seeing the reality of his real condition, and the need to humble himself in order to be able to see himself as he is, and seek the help of His Creator without whom he is a living, moving shell, yet, without the vital part of him being alive, which would make him complete.

I have yet to see you even come close to making this point except to somehow argue that the only way to tell right from wrong is if someone is prepgrammed by a deity.

«11 Yet, beneath his rhetoric, Anderson assumed that New England civilization «is the highest and best, in a religious point of view, the world has yet seen.&raqYet, beneath his rhetoric, Anderson assumed that New England civilization «is the highest and best, in a religious point of view, the world has yet seen.&raqyet seen.»

Yet I don't see anything there inherent in your points that would exclude people within those institutional structures from the Kingdom or having a rich relationship with Jesus.

«Blessed are those who have not seen [the risen Lord in objective form] and yet believe» John 20:29) is precisely to the point.

To me, the logic of the post is so clear, and yet, from an orthodox approach, I can see his point of view.

I have yet to make any dish with quinoa since the last time I saw a recipe you made with it, but at some point I am going to try it.

Although menu labelling is not yet mandatory, two - thirds of Canadians like the idea, and value nutritional information as important.1 The data points to another business opportunity: 52 % say they would be more likely to choose a restaurant with detailed nutritional information.1 But only one in five can recall seeing this type of information on restaurant menus.1 Set yourself apart from the competition by running nutritional information on your healthy menu options.

It's the toughest season yet though, and we can see other clubs not exactly running away with it, with three points behind a team we thrashed 3 — 0, I'm quite confident after the next few games we can be top.

Hole left by carzola looks bigger every game... Only supply routes look like bellerin and kolasinac and while both have potential they are not completely reliable yet... Hoping to see wilshire on at some point

And yet at the time same time, you know, I've seen this movie, I understand it and if it gets to a point then we'll go from there.»

Sorry but people keep on saying new players yet I have seen many games this season, including yesterday, where the AFC team was superior yet did not take 3 points.

Team Gutman had yet to really get going though at that point and they are much stronger Team than we saw back in November..

That's probably the point, he hasn't done anything yet, while others where seen to be not good enough for silverware.

But I've yet to see anybody who's really, really confident either Alabama or Ohio State has hands - down earned the No. 4 spot... other than Big Ten commish Jim Delany, who likes the fact that Ohio State played a lot of Power 5 teams, or Nick Saban, who likes the fact that he didn't lose a game by 30 points, that is.

A lot of people have heard of Canaan by this point, but there are still plenty who have yet to actually see him.

based on what Iv seen of the team so far and our co-contenders ability and potential i.e ManCity playing very well, yet to drop a point even with Kompany and Aguero returning an added advantage..

There are too many good players on offense and it would take almost no effort to create easy looks for them and Winston and yet to this point I haven't seen it.

While NYRB can be admired as an organization for having installed a consistent system from the academy through to the first team, I don't see Timbers as being close to that point yet, especially considering the disappointing season T2 had last year, and the move from Porter to Gio.

You keep saying that he's taking us backwards, yet if you did any research (I know, it's unheard of for you) prior to posting yet another garbage of a post, you'd see that our points total this year is better than in any of the previous 4 years after the same number of games.

Well... i say we should just take it one step / game at a time and not get ahead of ourselves yet, all we have to do is focus on our own games and other clubs, we need to keep winning matches and at our tough away matches where we can't win or play very well like the Man Utd game, i say we take a point and we will see what happens at the end of the season, COYG

My point is they can see in Scotlands and other cases that the league is weak so shouldnt be judged alike / aside others, but yet they are not consistent throughout.

We saw similar line movement in the NCAA Football National Championship game between Alabama and Notre Dame, where the Fighting Irish received two - thirds of public bets, yet moved from 7.5 to 10 point underdogs at most books.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits