Sentences with phrase «see the questions right»

They will want you to see the questions right when you are taking it.

Not exact matches

The question to ask, when you feel pride, then, is this: What am I missing right now that a more humble person might see?

The more time you spend swapping complaints about your boss, links to the best video you've seen all year and — oh, right — questions about work, the harder it becomes to recover and produce.

Answer the questions below to see if the time is right to hire somebody.

Difference makers are the ones who ask the right questions, see the whole picture, and go outside of their networks to gather ideas from a variety of perspectives.

Not knowing which questions to ask is the top mistake I see people making, and the easiest piece to get right for effective reference calls.

Copywriter Salaries Copywriting Examples Start Learning Copy Now Copywriting Tools Consulting As A Side Job How To Become A Copywriter Make a Copywriting Portfolio Copywriting Books and Courses Freelance Writing for Beginners Swipe File Copywriting Guides: The State of Copywriting 2018 Direct Mail Marketing Guide One Pager Examples Sell Me This Pen Leading Questions Why Use Images vs Text How To Write A Brochure Headlines That Sell Using Ear Plugs To Write Writing Guides Three Tiered Pricing Different Pricing Examples How To Make A PDF Billboard Advertising Guide Write an AirBnB Description How to Write a SWOT Analysis Job Interview Questions How to Write a Memo How to Write a Testimonial Make Money Licensing Music How to Create a Tagline Work From Home Successfully LinkedIn Recommendations Choosing The Right Photos How to Start A Conversation How to Sell Art Online How To Become A Life Coach Best Business Podcasts Tone of Voice in Copywriting Workplace Communication Skills Power & Trigger Words For Sales Content Marketing Guides: Writing Advertorials Easiest Font to Read How To Write A Follow Up Email Cold Email Like A Boss S&P 500 Company Slogan Effective Sales Letters How to Write a Newsletter How to Write an About Page How to Get Your Posts Seen Making A Content Mill Real Estate Flyers Get First Photography Job Email Open Rate Examples Content Writing vs Copywriting Become A Famous YouTuber Story Arcs for Content Marketing Copywriter Mentality: Writers Block Copywriting Quotes Psychology of Marketing Taking a Workcation to Think Health / Wealth / Love Test How to Interview Someone Get a Job or Start a Business?

Charles: Right, I think that's a huge demographic question that I haven't seen any really good statistics on because of course most of the boomers are still in their late 50s or 60s, early 70s and they're not yet to the point where the older generation like the boomer parents, the so - called silent generation, which has sold their houses or given them to their offspring, their adult children.

But even with this restriction, there should be considerable opportunity to argue that international law might inform such matters as: the content of the duty to consult, the significance of the right to culture, the respect that should be accorded to indigenous conceptions of property, and the question of what might constitute an unjustifiable infringement of an aboriginal right or title or a treaty right: see my post on the Supreme Court's Grassy Narrows decision here.

You dodged the question, I don't mind the way you did it, I just want to see if someone gay has equal rights by you (in the church)?

It's always very funny to see the religious zealots scream about what they «know» their god wants, but when it's an uncomfortable contradiction then «oh god can't be understood» or «who are you to question god» (might makes right?).

You're little scene you gave me is patently false because I don't imemdiately jump to the conclusion of materilization, but I guess since this is how you learn, lets go: Chad and Chuckles are walking in the woods Me: Hey cool, a watch, I wonder where it came from Chad: stupid question, it came from god, but I guess if you want to get more specific, someone probably dropped it Me: you're right, lets check to see if someone is missing a watch - Chad and Chuckles head to town, post signs and after no success for many weeks, decide that the person who dropped it probably isn't around.

The movie served to give me a different platform to discuss faith from, not to argue that my belief system is right and someone else's is wrong, but instead to point out that the world is hungry for questions about the soul and what we don't see right in front of us.

Right now, I can not answer them, and I don't see Tom, or Lou, or Dennis, trying to answer those questions from Scripture either.

One of the things I see them and many other Christian people wrestling with is summarized in two simple questions: What's the right thing to do, and what's the wrong thing to do?

As soon as I saw that I knew it was going to be an article criticizing those who question the presidents» beliefs, and that it would also call into question the whole notion of there being a right or wrong brand of Christianity.

I'm ready to see the same type of article written about Romney & Mormonism... if you are going to question if a candidate is «the right or wrong» kind of Christian, I believe a great number of the Christian Right would be stunned at some of the practices & beliefs of the Mormon fright or wrong» kind of Christian, I believe a great number of the Christian Right would be stunned at some of the practices & beliefs of the Mormon fRight would be stunned at some of the practices & beliefs of the Mormon faith.

If you read through my blog just a little, you will see that I defend our right and responsibility to ask questions.

«I had questions about inerrancy,» «I saw that truth is in many ways relative,» «I support the civil rights of gays and lesbians,» «I think «the market» has become an idol» and so on.

So, the true question may not be whether or not church hopping is right or wrong, but instead, if you have a community that sees you, knows you, loves you and challenges you consistently, regardless of where you attend on Sunday.

you cant smell taste or see gravity... you were sold out too (see my point.your little remark can be sent right back at you) and whats this carp of me now being allowed to question?

Election results raise questions about Christian right's influence... The EVANGELICALS took over the Republican party when Reagen was president and they have been dictating the agenda ever since... I hope they keep dictating because I want to see the stupid backward republicans become extinct.

(i) the question of gay rights — funny I agree with gay rights, must be a political debate at its heart (ii) a wonan's right to choose — funny I agree with this, see above thought (iii) teaching evolution in school — again I agree (iv) my ability to buy a glass of wine on Sunday — definitely politics here (v) immunizing teens against HPV — got my kids immunized, not even politics here (vi) population control — this is religions fault??? no this is cultural (vii) assisted suicide at end of life — agree with that, still have my religion (viii) global warmning — agree it needs to get fixed, doesn't have anything to do with religion

So let's see if I can pose another question that should play right into your wheelhouse.

Hard questions arise when people of faith exercise religion in ways that may be seen to conflict with the new right to same - sex marriage — when, for example, a religious college provides married student housing only to opposite - sex married couples, or a religious adoption agency declines to place children with same - sex married couples.

We debate endlessly about Peace, Democracy, the Rights of Man, the conditions of racial and individual eugenics, the value and morality of scientific research pushed to the uttermost limit, and the true nature of the Kingdom of God; but here again, how can we fail to see that each of these inescapable questions has two aspects, and therefore two answers, according to whether we regard the human species as culminating in the individual or as pursuing a collective course towards higher levels of complexity and consciousness?

I've always viewed the song as kind of Psalmic - in the Psalms the biggest cries of despair and questioning come from those who believe and are acting in faith, but can't see God right now.

[64] These two questions are not asked because owners see their pets as extensions of the family with essentially equal rights and privileges.

Any genuine struggle for justice could only begin at the point where such limits are called into question and where the rights of one are seen also as being valid for the other.

I did say, «I would love to see what sort of thoughts you have on either question, then again as we can see from the begining of this thread, when people answered your intial idiotic assertions, you refused to even try to back them up, lets see what happens this time...» And you proved me right!

But not the slightest question is raised as to whether Mrs. Sadik (whose plans to have abortion declared a universal human right were derailed by the Holy See at Cairo) might not have an axe to grind in her «reconstruction» of her meeting with the Pope.

Andy Ginny, while your trying to find the verse that doesn't exist within the context you say it exists, why don't you look up Acts 17:11 to see what a believer's rights as to asking questions are.

I saw the link right after i posted my question - doh!

seeing as i pay season tickets - have done for 9 years, am a gooner thru an thru if i question a player its my right as a fan

whether for the right or wrong reasons, our leader chose to stay on when things took a turn of sorts... a new owner arrived on the scene, plans for a new stadium emerged and Wenger became the bearer of bad news... he sold us on a new story, one that required patience on our parts... financial constraints were the order of the day, so that the enormous sums spent on the new venue could be recouped... although some would question the validity of such claims, why wouldn't they believe their faithful leader... according to those within the hierarchy, the future never looked so bright, as this new home would ensure our place among the elites for years to come... as we all know now these claims were a well constructed fabrication and so those who feel they were duped in the process are infuriated and rightly so... the fact that this club and it's manager have continually misled the fans, especially following Gazidis's claims about our financial liquidity, simply rubbed more salt in an already gaping wound... this surely isn't how you treat your «family», especially when they supported you through the supposed «lean» years... it was a dirty trick played by Kroenke but the fact is was orchestrated by Wenger himself hurt the most... as for those in the media, many of whom are former players or longtime pundits, who observed the early years firsthand, saw this as the perfect opportunity to vent the anger they felt towards this pretentious man once and for all... all in all, karma's a bitch

Facts are irrelevant to a degree — what you see on the pitch is reality - and the true facts are we have been gradually declining year on year and my article is a question that is hypothetical as there isn't a right answer or wrong answer..

Then it is just a question of Holding of Mustafi on the right and I would prefer to see the young Englishman given the nod in a game that should not be too difficult for him.

i saw the Liverpool and Southampton match both teams are performing and scoring a goals especially when i see the unlucky arsenal being taken to regrets and chelsea are the same but with more interested group of players, staff and managers and ours is like we are conceding a lot of goals due to defensive issues and old village idiot is asked whether they should have signed a defensive player old fool replies you people don't see the match and not knowing what he said and the media has got the frenchie by his nuts and when squeezed blood is more than just will come out, i can't say i hope he leaves cause the board only took questions they liked the BBC journo showed right down his throat asking cut - throat questions the way i like it.

Wenger said «Judge me on May», here is May... Carbon copy season to the previous seasons, the same mistakes, the same tactics, the same arrogance, nothing changed... I would like this review to come from the board... They has to question the manager what's gone wrong and what he need to get in the right track... Even - though somehow we finished second, I see us moved backward...

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

They certainly do, but the question is if they will react in the right way to this pressure, or even whether their form will be good enough to see them play regularly for Arsenal in order to make sure of their inclusion in the England squad.

I have been reading comments of fans on here, especially those who have chosen to appreciate the average in ability that a striker like giroud possess, my question for ya all is, when did arsenal become a team so low on profile to sing praise of a striker who no one can rank among the top 3 striker in the league, I have seen an arsenal team with a striking force with players like, anelka, Wright, Henry, v persie, no one can rank giroud or whatever his name is in the category of my mentioned strikers.we all have got to face it, giroud is not good enough to be leading the attack of a team dreaming of winning the league, and Henry is right saying arsenal can't win the league with giroud as our striker,,, check this out, man u won league titles with strikers like Rooney, van nisteroy, v persie, man city won with aguero, Chelsea with drogba and now Costa, giroud stand no chance against any of those.let's stop appreciating mediocrity, wenger should get us a good striker as giroud is damn too average for arsenal

It is easy to criticise and make the right or wrong assumptions, but we would to see a pundits (most of them rubbish in the UK anyway) or their so called football specialists ask some football questions to the «deluded one»...

In a way I understand that Wenger wants Wilshere to play as much football as possible in order to get his career back on the right track, but seeing the amount of interest in our midfielder, with The Mirror reporting that as many as 22 clubs from the Premier League and the other top leagues around Europe want him, you have to question the wisdom of sending him out on loan.

thats right, as a conselation prize for losing (and to keep anyone from asking questions IMO) the people of wisconsin would of seen they're economy boom from all the cheese.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

personally i do nt need to see trophies, dats not my point, but i do want reassurance that wer moving in the right direction and at the moment our movement is all southwards mate like iv said before im not bashing wenger the sales / buys are facts since 03 and id rather do raise my questions and worries here in july rather than others who will be lookin for blood in december

Marcos Alonso should start once again but there could be question marks over the right wing - back position; we could see an impressive Davide Zappacosta come in to give Victor Moses a rest.

I personally slaughtered Moyes from the day he was appointed as our new manager, and I have absolutely no regrets about him being sacked, but seeing United play so poorly against Swansea is extremely worrying, and immediately invites people to question whether we got the right man in LVG.

And I'm hoping that by seeing that right away that it would raise questions and concerns a woman might not have thought of early on.