Can the upper 4 (coloured) lines all be converted to (say) equivalent temperature or radiative forcing (to
see the relative importance), and then added (or otherwise combined) to produce a line that correlates with the black line?
However, as we can
see the relative importance of each source has changed somewhat over the years, with teachers increasingly likely to be prepared out of state or in University of California schools.
Can the upper 4 (coloured) lines all be converted to (say) equivalent temperature or radiative forcing (to
see the relative importance), and then added (or otherwise combined) to produce a line that correlates with the black line?
Not exact matches
Numbers fell to the level
seen before the great explosion of the 19th century - about 200 a year - reflecting the
relative decline in their
importance.
According to recent FAO statistics, pork is second only to beef in terms of meat production in Uganda (
see Table Below) since imports and exports of meat products are negligible; this ranking also reflects the
relative importance currently of pork in terms of meat consumption.
It's weird to think that just 3 years later when I
saw Saatchi's YBA collection at County Hall, Tate, still in
relative infancy, was well and truly established in its
importance.
In the end, however, I
see the bickering over the
relative importance of terrestrial foods as symptomatic of the politics of polar bears that Amstrup takes so personally, in part because it's now his job to do so.
Yes, by breaking this down, we can
see what the premises and assumptions are, including the necessity and
relative importance of the components for the overall hypothesis.
No need, and yes, rather dumb * of me to forget the decay products (* or perhaps just evidence of lack of time on my part), although the broader point I made still stands, which is that some sources of radiation are otherwise chemically benign and others are not, though I admit much ignorance on the
relative importance of chemical toxicity and wouldn't be surprised to find out it is generally quite small in such incidents like Fukushima and Chernobyl — but I don't actually know it; I thought perhaps it deserved clarification (and maybe — note that I'm not justifying this — that's why some people may
see radiation from a pollutant as worse than radiation from natural source?).
Indeed, there is recent jurisprudence suggesting that, if anything, it is today a factor of declining
relative importance:
see Medis Health and Pharmaceutical Services Inc. v. Bramble (1999), 175 D.L.R. (4th) 385 (N.B.C.A.)(«Bramble») and Vibert v. Paulin (2008), 291 D.L.R. (4th) 302 (N.B.C.A.).
It has been held that the character of employment as being one of a rather low level is today a factor of declining
relative importance:
see DiTomaso v. Crown Metal Packaging Canada LP, 2011 ONCA 469 (CanLII) at paras. 27 and 28.