Sentences with phrase «see the responses so»

Click on the user name to see the responses so far.

I saw somebody else had asked and it didn't see a response so I thought I would try.

Not exact matches

Although this is a good general rule, your customers» habits may be different, so try experimenting, for instance by offering giveaways on different days and at different times to see which get the greatest response.

We've seen great responses by the networks in the projects we've done so far.

Facebook needs to see responses to keep sending your feed to your fans, so you need to get responses on your post.

Even so, the duo have been making great strides with the number of app downloads, and they say they've seen positive responses from students.

The immune system sometimes takes time to adjust, and so responses can lag behind those seen with traditional chemotherapy.

So now that we've had a chance to see what an outsourcing project response might look like (without you having to spend 15 hours to find out), next time I will break down the four things you'll need as a non-technical business owner, to get you through your next technical outsourcing project.

So we can see these three escalating steps of failure in the global health response, he said: «One, at the very earliest stage, it was missed in country.

So what we're seeing in response is the Trump administration identifying this as a top - tier national security problem where neither side sees off - ramps.

Targeting a smaller group means you'll get fewer replies, but your message will make more sense to more people, so you'll see higher open, click and reply rates, better quality responses, and fewer negative responses.

«When people scroll down, you have to be cautious so they don't see that the response is almost word - for - word each time,» Baer says.

So, on Monday, I showed how Ontario universities are changing their enrolment patterns in response to changing demand and what we saw was that over the period 2009 - 2016, enrolments in Arts stayed flat while enrolments in STEM rose by nearly 40 %.

We've become so accustomed to dips being bought over the last couple of years that this appears to have caught people off - guard and that's generated some of the panic responses that we've seen.

The way I see it — the terrorists who kill are perpetrating a killing which itself is in response to a much larger killing that is being perpetrated by civilized, clean - shaven, so - called progressive westerners like yourself.

If I could figure out how to block responses for you so I didn't have to even see your revolting comments, I would.

I find her response so interesting... «But when she saw him, she was troubled at his saying, and considered what manner of greeting this was».

The thing that really raises my blood pressure is that if I said «It seems like you're threatening us» «it seems like you're shaming us» «It seems like you're trying to control us» I can already hear and see the response of «I'm so sorry you feel that way, I certainly never wanted to communicate those things.....

I am especially grateful for this link because I was so disappointed in the only other two responses I had seen to Kevin DeYoung's questions: those of Matthew Vines and John Shore.

The post is so full of historical inaccuracies, theological problems, and contradictions that it's hard to know where to start, but I want to make clear from the get - go that my response to this post should not be seen as an attack on Tim Challies himself, (who I respect and like), but rather a response to the general belief that God's presence is limited to the pages of Scripture and that all forms of contemplative or experiential spirituality should therefore be dismissed out of hand or regarded with suspicion.

In response to those who despair or who think that suffering is useless and so see suicide and euthanasia as quick ways out, Farmer recognises that the temptations to lose faith, to look inwards in anger and resentment, are all too real.

It means that something rises up in our soul when we see it, and we offer the only response: God, that is so beautiful.

If the human mind is the sole reality, and the so - called physical world unreal, an inert, lifeless machine, it is easy to see how the barking and writhing would not be seen as manifestations and responses to pain.

So, I am seeing a pattern in your responses.

I keep hopping on here to post a nasty, hateful, typically christian comment and then I run really fast to another board so that I don't have to see what people say to me in response.

I'm not offended by the word science but that's when I noticed how long the post was so I scrolled down to see the responses without reading it.

I have some personal thoughts on your comments: «Thats why God made everyone responsible for the upkeep of his house so the world would see how we loved his Church and how he loved us in response.

And if we see the roots of the riots in the effect upon parents of the 1989 Children Act, and the roots of such legislation in the western episcopal response to the 1968 Humanae Vitae, so we would place the roots of that neo-protestant silence in the success of the Reformation.

In response to the first quote from Palmer, we would say that one reason the Calvinist so clearly see election in this text is precisely because they read the Bible with preconceived notions about election.

Based on reader response, I have asked Thomas Nelson to put the word «vagina» back in, so we can see how Lifeway and other Christian bookstores respond to it.

We know enough of the possibility of love to God on our part to long for its perfection; we see enough of the reality of God's love toward us and neighbor to hope for its full revelation and so for our full response.

Jeremy have been asking the holy spirit for his help with this and in regards to the lame man that Jesus healed I do nt believe that sin was the issue for him just like the blind man was it his parents or did he sin the answer was neither but so that God would be glorified.What was the sin that may have been worse for him.The two situations are related of the woman caught in adultery the key words being go and sin no more only two references in the bible and will explain later the lame man we see at first his dependency on everyone else for his needs he cant do it he is in the best position to receive Gods grace but what does he do with it.Does he follow Jesus no we are told he goes to the temple and Jesus finds him now that he has his strength to do things on his own what his response to follow the way of the pharisees that is what is worse than his condition before so he is warned by go and sin no more.We get confused because we see the word sin but the giver of is speaking to him to go another way means death.Getting back to the two situations of the woman caught in adultery and the lame man here we see a picture of our hearts on the one our love for sin and on the other the desire to work out our salvation on our terms they are the two areas we have to submit to God.My experience was the self righteousness was the harder to deal with because it is linked in to our feelings of self worth and self confidence so we have to be broken so we are humble enough to realise that without God we can do nothing our flesh hates that so it is a struggle at first to change our way of thinking.brentnz

So when we look at the religious aspect of human existence and see what contributions process thought may have to make to this inescapable and indestructible manifestation of the human spirit, we shall need to emphasize that it is to be understood not in the wooden fashion that so often has prevailed in institutional churches and in conventional religious communities but as a matter of imaginative and aesthetic response to the human situation and to whatever is supremely worshipful in the cosmos — that is, to what religion calls «God.&raquSo when we look at the religious aspect of human existence and see what contributions process thought may have to make to this inescapable and indestructible manifestation of the human spirit, we shall need to emphasize that it is to be understood not in the wooden fashion that so often has prevailed in institutional churches and in conventional religious communities but as a matter of imaginative and aesthetic response to the human situation and to whatever is supremely worshipful in the cosmos — that is, to what religion calls «God.&raquso often has prevailed in institutional churches and in conventional religious communities but as a matter of imaginative and aesthetic response to the human situation and to whatever is supremely worshipful in the cosmos — that is, to what religion calls «God.»

So as I have been reading this article and it's responses it seems that the Devil himself can be president and most of you would not even see it.

But as an artist I see and hear so much that delights me that my response to life is ecstatic.»

Note: Several atheists have jumped into the comment section to answer your questions from last week, so if you didn't see a response to your question here, check there.

And I freely admit I sometimes use too many extraneous, space - consuming, overly - descriptive, qualifying, words or sentences written quickly and in a stream - of - conscientiousness, run - on sort of fashion with occasional typos mostly due to fatigue of being up way too late (which also explains this post in general) after a long day of political discussion which refreshingly had little religious content though of course there is often much overlap between the two but posting is barely a hobby but more of an occasional passtime so now i wonder if what I write could be considered abuse as I've can't really recall seeing much if any sorrt of «text filibustering» not that this is exactly filibustering more a spontaneous text performance response joke and meant in jest to be absurdly long and useless so of course i hope you appreciate the spirit.

According to Dr. Altizer, «Ahab's mad quest for the white whale can be seen as faith's response to the death of God, wherein the man of faith becomes the murderer of God so as to make possible a historical actualization of God's death in Jesus, and thus an apocalyptic consummation of God's original self - sacrifice or self - negation.»

I am inclined to believe also that some of the Christians who condone and practice ultraviolence do so out of frustration; when faced by ultraviolent opponents, they see no possible response other than ultraviolence.

And please take advantage of the «like» feature so I can see which responses are most popular.

I wonder why so many people instantly assume a conspiracy when they see the «awaiting moderation» response?

I'd never heard of a kolache until I saw a recipe posted on the Homesick Texan blog for strawberry cream cheese kolaches (written in response to the awful explosion in West, Texas) with an interesting back story of how this Czech pastry got so popular there.

Mountain West is seeing a tremendous response from its consumers in Utah, so much so that it has depleted the apple supply in the state and is looking for additional suppliers in Idaho and Colorado.

But I have seen so many lightened up recipes using cauliflower (and after the enthusiastic response from my kids!)

If you do respond here, I would like to post your response on my blog so that others will see your follow up on this issue.

It's very difficult to find organic almond flour, so I contacted Bob's Red Mill to see if they use PPO, and got this response, «The almonds used for the Almond Flour and Natural Almond Flour are not treated with propylene oxide.»

And it's so beautiful to see everyone being so encouraging and kind in their responses to you:) I'm getting a real «we're all in this together» vibe from the community you've created with your blog and you should be so proud of that!

I blog because I love it and because I believe the way to the heart is through the stomach, so seeing such a positive response to a post I already love gives me the warm fuzzies.

I've seen majority of the responses were «It's a semi-final, so that's understandable».

This isn't a case of «what have you done for me lately» as that would imply that things went off the rails fairly recently, and it's certainly not a change simply for the sake of change scenario, as we're not so naive to believe that this alone would guarantee long - term success, this is a measured response based on YEARS of questionable decisions, failed tactics, boardroom blunders, unprecedented losses and a level of dishonesty never before seen at our club.