Sentences with phrase «see the return on their investment as»

Not exact matches

If you're using it as a family, Amazon Household is one of the easiest ways to see the return on your Prime membership investment.

Hamilton and her staff — she now has a full team that includes Kimberlin as a venture partner — don't expect to see any returns on their investments within the next five years, so in the meantime, it's important that they, like many other top VC firms, help these founders get to the next stage.

As founder of thoroughbred investment syndicate Affirmed Bloodstock, Wagner saw a 22 % return on investment in 2011 after selling 11 horses acquired the previous year.

Today, we are seeing high - growth numbers and more rapid returns on investment with the evolving and in - demand digital health industry that is driving exits such as FitBit, Evolent Health and Teledoc.

But since college should be seen as an investment, why not at least evaluate the return on that investment?

While we used to think of new mines as projects that required WTI prices near $ 100 per barrel to be viable, we can see 10 % rates of return on investment at WTI prices below $ US65 per barrel for a new build.

If so, a whole lot of entrepreneurs might be putting in a ton of work only to see very little return on their investment of time as their various efforts cancel each other out.

The return on investment for email marketing is significant even at non-holiday times, so it should be seen as a low - hanging - fruit delivery system for Black Friday and Cyber Monday.

Difficulty is likely to increase substantially as ASIC devices come on the market, so it might be worth increasing this metric in the calculator to see what your return on investment will be like as more people join the game.

While we used to think of new mines as projects that required WTI prices near $ 100 per barrel to be viable, we can see 10 per cent rates of return on investment at WTI prices below $ US65 per barrel for a new build.

If you are paying 8 % on your student loans and are worried that you will only see 7 % annualized returns on your investments, paying down your student loans as fast as possible makes sense.

Most investing beginners see investing as the act of putting in money in a system for a return on investment.

As you can see, the ATS winning percentage and return on investment (ROI) for college football road teams steadily increases as we gradually lower the closing totaAs you can see, the ATS winning percentage and return on investment (ROI) for college football road teams steadily increases as we gradually lower the closing totaas we gradually lower the closing total.

As you can see betting on teams who are receiving less than 35 % of public wagers has the highest units earned with 28.14, however the actual return on investment would be noticeably higher when that number drops below 30 %.

As you can see we have a direct correlation between an increased over / under and an improved return on investment (ROI).

As you can see from the table below, the return on investment (ROI) of our contrarian betting strategy continues to improve as we look at increasingly lop - sided bet gameAs you can see from the table below, the return on investment (ROI) of our contrarian betting strategy continues to improve as we look at increasingly lop - sided bet gameas we look at increasingly lop - sided bet games.

As you can see from the screenshot below, this simple step nearly doubled our return on investment while maintaining a large sample size:

As you can see, the winning percentage and return on investment both continually increase as we examine games progressively earlier in the seasoAs you can see, the winning percentage and return on investment both continually increase as we examine games progressively earlier in the seasoas we examine games progressively earlier in the season.

Although the number of previous game matches and overall units won wanes at each data point, we do see our systems return on investment increase as we focus on higher scoring offensive teams.

You can clearly see that the return on investment gradually increases as we examine higher closing totals with the optimal range coming on over / unders of at least 8.5.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

As you can see, despite a 41.8 % winning percentage, a $ 100 / game bettor would be up $ 9,264 betting on all teams receiving less than 20 % of moneyline wagers — good for a 4.2 % return on investment.

As you can see, if you bet every Over since 2004 you would have barely cracked a profit (0.1 % return on investment).

As you can see, there's a direct correlation between decreasing public support and increasing profits as evidenced by the return on investmenAs you can see, there's a direct correlation between decreasing public support and increasing profits as evidenced by the return on investmenas evidenced by the return on investment.

... i believe the kind of investment that arsenal puts on the team is not proportional to the profit thats gained by the club and thats why you will hear year in year out how our returns eclipsed all the other teams but when it comes to investing in the team that brings these profits, its the other way round... what is the use of having money just laying in the bank idle while we can make better use of it by investing well on it???... i honestly don't believe that we will lift another major trophy with mr arsene as our manager... i just don't see it and if you disagree then care to tell me how

When you make an investment into anything as a business, you need to see an ROI (return on investment) on it as fast as possible, or it's just not a very sound business decision.

Tom DiNapoli: «Now that the economy has certainly been in a recovery mode, it's certainly not as strong as we'd like it to be in many parts of the state, I think now is a good time for us to look not only at this program, but at the various economic development dollars that we've spent over the past few years to see what kind of return we've been getting on those taxpayer dollar investments.

Ball said he understands why New Yorkers might feel that way, but he sees this as a larger tourism effort with a potentially high return on investment.

As a public - health intervention, immunisation is already widely seen as one of public health's «best buys», but by measuring the effectiveness in terms of lives saved, it seems likely that we are undervaluing the benefits and the return on investment they offeAs a public - health intervention, immunisation is already widely seen as one of public health's «best buys», but by measuring the effectiveness in terms of lives saved, it seems likely that we are undervaluing the benefits and the return on investment they offeas one of public health's «best buys», but by measuring the effectiveness in terms of lives saved, it seems likely that we are undervaluing the benefits and the return on investment they offer.

They will see this (correctly) as the university's intellectual property, and since it is valuable, a potential source of revenue, a return on investment by the feds that should go to the university.

As you can see, from a metabolic perspective the return on your investment of time and energy into acquiring new muscle mass is less than overwhelming.

On top of this, as Richard Price wrote for the Christensen Institute, «From a university's perspective, re-enrolling students who have dropped out are often seen as generating lower returns on investment than first - time enrollment and retention effortOn top of this, as Richard Price wrote for the Christensen Institute, «From a university's perspective, re-enrolling students who have dropped out are often seen as generating lower returns on investment than first - time enrollment and retention efforton investment than first - time enrollment and retention efforts.

«We're not going to spend the same on students from disadvantaged backgrounds as students in the suburbs,» says Ulrich Boser, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress who recently led a study called Return on Educational Investment, «but when you look across the U.S., we see that some schools are able to do more with less.

Acura has made a commitment to us, and we are committed to seeing that Acura receives the same return on its investment as our other teams and manufacturers.

In other words, he has seen the ROI (return on investment) opportunity of the century... and now he's running with it as quickly as he can.

Now, as its publisher and number one proprietor, you have two primary concerns for your efforts: get the book read by others, and see a return on your investment.

As you will typically invest significant resources into your promotional campaign, it is natural to want to see a return on your investment in the form of profit generated by increased book sales.

We are now seeing a positive return on investment (ROI) on budgets as high as $ 50 per day.

Investors see Brampton as a safe place to place their money while still seeing good returns on their investments.

I can not speak for Canadian procedure, but I know that in the US depending on how the «return / gain» is classified will sometimes trigger taxation as it is considered exceptional gain but even then usually you can offset it by your «investment expenses» and normally comes to a wash, meaning it has to be reported TECHNICALLY as a gain but it is often offset elsewhere in the code, have you checked to see if that «taxation» was also offset by any «credit» elsewhere?

As you can see from the results above, there is quite a bit of profit potential and return on your investment.

Unlike many other investments, with a solar panel system you should expect to see immediate returns on your investment by saving you money on your electricity bill right away, even as you're paying on the lease or loan.

Review your mortgage statement to see how much of your loan you have left to payoff, then evaluate targeting this as a goal before you retire (the «return» on your money is essentially equal to your interest rate — you'll lose the tax deduction for the interest, but if you invested the same amount you'd owe taxes on the investment return).

I have invested + / - $ 2000 increments on an irregular basis in this since 2007, as shown in the chart using a buy & hold strategy, and have seen a return of 17 % on investment in that period.

The process would remain the same: look at as many similar projects from a riskiness perspective, and see which investment yielded the best return on the equity.

Pensions are tough on governments as we see now, because they guarantee a certain rate of return regardless of what the pension's investment's return.

That is as high of a return on investment as you will see on most trading websites Another really nice feature of this binary option broker is that they also offer those that trade with them a convenient mobile app.

In other words don't count on that cash being returned to shareholders or even invested in passive investments (private or public equity) for the benefit of shareholders; A liquidation valuation really isn't of interest here as Glassbridge is set to be an ongoing business and I can see an operating cash bleed for 3 - 5 years depending on how long it takes the company to attract enough AUM to cover operating (read staffing) costs.

So, sadly, when it comes to internal upgrades — such as fixing a rotten foundation, insulation and even soundproofing — you're never going to see a big return on your investment.

Also, since you still earn the appreciation on your investment despite using the equity that paid for the investment, it may be cheaper than drawing money out of your retirement accounts as that money used will no longer see a return.