Sentences with phrase «see the show too»

We're excited that we can bring along a friend and her mom to see the show too; because I'm going to need another adult to survive the night.

Wish I could see this show too!

Not exact matches

That's another big learning: I see companies go public too quickly and then feel pressure to show profitability and can't invest in growth the way they could had they stayed private.

They saw that even though men were willing to shell out for a custom suit, they were holding on to their dress shirts for far too long, some showing up to fittings with stained and frayed shirts.

«We have made a lot more money out of See's than shows from the earnings of See's, just by the fact that it's educated me, and I'm sure it's educated Charlie too.»

«It's hard to describe a scratch so someone can picture [it] exactly, but if you put a picture that shows it, the person can see it and say, «Oh, that's not too bad,»» McGrath explains.

«The current bull market is not going to end simply because «stocks have gone up too much»... The buyside is fairly cautious, seeing downside stemming from: (i) deflationary pressures of the 40 % year - over-year oil decline, deceleration in China, Eurozone weakness, and the fall in 5 - year inflation breakevens; and (ii) Fed monetary tightening... Capital stock is again showing signs of pent - up demand, and as a consequence, companies and households will have to invest.

Earnings season is about to get underway, too, which is more than likely going to show a fourth straight quarterly decline in profits — and if firms aren't seeing bottom line leverage, they may be slow to dole out new positions, or much in the way of payroll hikes.

My guess is that they are too focused on trying to show the US in a negative light to see what's going on in China.

The latest trade data for March are expected to show a sharp narrowing in the headline deficit, which should be partly due to the better goods trade balance, as seen in the relevant data released a week ago, while services balance should show an improvement too.

How many times have you seen Black or Hispanic community leaders complain that too many US TV shows and movies lump them in with gangs?

I think I'm too simple in my thinking that; if you don't like it, DO N'T WATCH... if you don't agree with it, DO N'T CHOOSE TO LIVE YOUR LIFE THAT WAY... Seems like a very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i see...

I don't dismiss the possibility of demons, possession, hunters named Sam and Dean who are too gorgeous and may show up on my doorstep one day carrying salt shotguns and holy water... * ahem * but I digress... I don't dismiss those possibilities, but I do see them as infinitely rare to the point of almost improbable.

You don't see too many movies about jesus, allah ur buddhsit because it could be offensive and too risky to of movie or show to make.

If they saw our lifestyle, again just like Muslims, people would see we are everyday Americans too, not some 19th century holdback like the polygamist Fundamentalist Latter Day Saints (not affiliated with them at all) that people portray on shows like Sister Wives, and etc..

The Springer show is somewhere where you are more likely to see Christians who probably a lot of other Christians would say «they are not really Christians», so you are just highlighting this characterisic of Christianity that we hear about all too often which exposes the conflicted nature of that bag of garbage sold to men by other men long ago.

Chad once again shows us his dishonest attempt at slight of hand, too bad he's trying to trick people who can see right through his veil of bull shlt.

The next showing of himself will be too late for this many who have eyes and yet do not see.

I have seen all too often where churches work so hard to put on their salvation shows by manipulating people down the aisle so like a old western gunslinger they can put another notch on their belts.

I think, too, we have been very burnt with the «miracle» shows we have seen on «christian» TV shows.

Everywhere he was seen during that period» on a VH - 1 documentary, on the David Letterman Show, in his recording studio» it was seen, too.

He saw bravery too, he said, in the family's coming to confront him in public — greater bravery than he could show if positions were reversed.

should we look through the historical religions to see what each of those represent and show that those gods were there to show their support too?

Cecilia, it gets even worse when you realize that many of these men are the same people who push the modesty movement — meaning that they believe men are uncontrollable hormone monsters who can't keep themselves in check if they see a woman showing too much skin — and often believe in complimentarism to the point where men are wild and reckless and need wives to «tame» them.

Amen.The thing is too many people from both sides try to disprove the other, Scientist (well some) will say there is no God Ala Hawkings here and then some believers will say that evolution or anything pertaining to science that they don't understand is false.I don't believe that science and God are mutually exclusive.For me personally science helps to explain a lot of things regarding creation, almost like giving me a window into how creative God is.I believe that God uses science to show us how awesome he is.To me science does not disprove Gods existence it actually reaffirms it on a human logic level, for me.You may disagree, that's fine, but this is just how I see it.

I want so much for them to see who God really is and that is why Jesus came so that we could see and so we too, by the spirit of Christ, could show them.

If these were scenes in a (non-Mel Gibson) film they would be too graphic for children younger than 14 to see, but parents blissfully show them off to their toddlers.

I've made a video to show you how easy this bircher muesli recipe is, once you see how simple and delicious it is I have a feeling you'll all be making it too!

(I have always wanted to see The Ellen Show live too, ha!)

I actually saw the episode of Sunny's show where she made these cookies too.

Women saw Carrie drinking it on the show time and time again so they drank it, too: suddenly, Cosmos were the drink du jour.

Of course other studies show that too much of a great thing can be too much for us — but with the exact dosage that single serve offers, as they say in the pharmaceutical ads, «Check with your doctor to see if coffee is right for you».

: I don't know Food Trends and Technologies: Naturally perceived treatment of spices Irradiation Steam processing Cold Pasteurization The biggest challenge the food industry has to face: being clean and balanced, but make sense Communication Who inspired to get into food: Alton Brown Good Eats A A Milne: Winnie the Pooh Favorite Quote: You are brave than you believe, stronger than you see, smarter than you think Tao of Pooh Favorite Book: Harry Potter Favorite Kitchen Item: Kitchen Aid Favorite Food: Spaghetti and Meat Sauce Advice to get into the food industry: Don't be afraid to have a bad interview, if you can show growth, you can still get the job Any Advice: Don't worry about grades too much.

Once they've been added to the top, swirl with a knife to make a pretty feathered pattern on the top Don't swirl it too much or you won't see the brownie part show through.

I've seen a few chili cook off shows on tv, and perhaps you have too.

You may have seen our recipe series on Spicy but there's also the ad Dave's buddy Wayne Scheiner created for the show too.

We also had a goal disallowed but Mustafi was offside before heading a free kick past Courtois, and Chelsea had chances as well, though, but not too many and it was an even game that saw Gunners show real grit and get a rare point at Stamford Bridge.

if i am correct @ SD... your analysis shows you see the forest for the trees, most comments just give their opinion like they are playing Championship manager - as JT said coquelin has helped slightly fix the problem of the overexposure of our defence to counter attacks and the full backs don't both bomb forward as much, the reason monreal starts ahead of Gibbs - walcott always looks lost and confused now when he makes appearances, and never wants to create or get too involved in build up play just wants to run into the middle and get on the end of balls.

i do nt see what all the big fuss about ozil is i honestly think fabregas would have been so much better ozil is too indirect, coasting around like a butterfly do nt get me wron g i like him but he offers little defending and shows lack of enthusiam.

What do you mean you do nt expect him to be good as De Gea.Why do you know anyone's future.If I was to be very honest with you even if we keep Ospina and sell Szczesny i do nt see him also becoming an all time great.To me he should go to Roma where i believe he can become an all time great.He is better than Ospina in terms of skill in goalkeeping but what makes Ospina better than him is that he acts more matured.You guys keep bringing up stats but we can all bring up stats for even a player who might not be better than another player but stats will make him look much better.Even hits stats show he is legendary but in actual sense he is not legendary.If u think am lying or talking too much lets Keep Ospina and sell Szcz and lets see.

We were always a strong team and recent results shows that our players are believing that too cant wait for the NLD... See us securing those three points @ the end of the game

A new contract will go a long way in protecting their position and showing their faith in the youngster, but it remains to be seen whether or not a move to Liverpool is too appealing to turn down.

Youngster Darron Gibson has shown glimpses of what he is all about without being too spectacular so I can see him being kept where as back up keeper Tomasz Kuszczak may elect to leave on his own accord due to lack of first team opportunities and the very real chance he will be passed over when a successor to Edwin Van der Sar is being lined up.

2) No leaders across the pitch: Özil for all the money is no leader but a technically gifted player who can split a defense with an exquisite vision and pass, Sanchez for all the dribbles as the potential but is not there yet, Cazorla will never be in the conversation, Mertesacker is not fit to be one anymore, Coquelin for all the good he has done is too tender and inexperience, Giroud no WC player to assume the role... the only one who can seriously be a leader is Wilshere but unfortunately until he becomes consistent and set the tone with his talent and passion... 3) Mertesacker is a shell of himself and it would be an embarrassment to see him continue to play in his current form, get Gabriel out just for the sake of showing anybody in this team that there's no place for under performers: we paid good money to get him so play him!

I would not worry too much if I were you though, because I think that as long as Arsenal do not turn up with the sort of abject showing we saw against Crystal Palace or Watford then we should be alright, and I very much doubt that the players are ready to slack off at the minute.

In the midfield, (including RWB & LWB) we have a whole bunch of tweeners... none offer the full package, none make sense in our manager's current favourite formation, except for Sead on the left and Ox on the right, and all of them have never shown any consistency for more than a heartbeat... Sead, who I'm including in this category because of our present formation, looks like a positive addition, minus his occasional brain farts, but I would rather see what he could do in a back 4 before making my mind up... Ox, who has never played better, which isn't saying much considering his largely underwhelming play in previous seasons, seems to have found a home in this new formation; unfortunately, can we really expect this oft - injured player to handle the taxing duties that come with said position over the long haul, not to mention, it looks like he has no intention of staying... Ramsey has relied on the empathy that stems from his gruesome injury years ago and the excitement that was generated a few years back when he finally seemed to put in altogether, but on the whole he has been a big disappointment (neither he nor the Ox have scored enough to warrant a regular spot)... Wiltshire should be put on a weekly contract then played until he suffers his first injury, if and when that occurs he should be shipped - out and no one should very be allowed to say his name on club grounds ever again... Elnehy & Coq are average players who couldn't make any of the top 7 teams currently in the EPL... both have showed some great energy on the pitch, but neither are top quality and no good team can afford to have that many average players on their bench playing the same position, especially with Coq's injury history / discipline concerns and Elheny's headless chicken tendencies... as for Xhaka, his tenure here so far has been incredibly underwhelming... we know he has some skills to provide the long ball but his defensive work is piss poor and he gives the ball away too cheaply and far too often... finally, the enigma himself, Ozil, so much skill with his left foot but his presence has been more frustrating than uplifting... in many respects his failure has been directly related to the failure of this club to provide him with the necessary players up front, minus Sanchez of course, and unless something drastic happens very soon his legacy will be largely a negative one (much like Wenger's)

its Money cause if it was trophy's it have be Man City my guess I think pep don't like how Sanchez is acting if I was Man City fan I wouldn't want him I use love Sanchez but he's true colors are showing arsenal have try offer nice package now I think he's been bit greedy with everything but who can blame him we're shambles from top too bottom I don't care where he goes I don't care we're ozil goes and by looking at lacasette he looks like he wants out as promises have been broke he came play with Sanchez and ozil and he gets welbeck and iwobi not fair really, I just want wenger gone because them players are not playing for him a lot is not rite and we as fans are paying for it but I don't care anymore don't care who leaves who comes in club is dead watch Liverpool yesterday boy was I envy ahwell let's see what happens

Why is it that the English commentators and pundits have such a terrible grudge against Arsenal...... we score beautiful goals but all I here commentators talk about is bad defending because the defense was all over the show, but the whole world can see that it is the movement of our front players that is too good for the opposition therefore defenders don't know whether they are marking our players or closing gaps

It's too easy to be a decent (but unimpressive) rookie OG on a decent line in a decent offense IF you are giving starter reps.. By observation, 8 + AV seemed to show more quality, and as you can see the drop there is much more gradual.

This season has shown me that we have too many one sided players, I'd keep Oxlade now but would still love to see someone like Bakayoko coming in, who himself has terrific dribbling ability.