Sentences with phrase «see them in court just»

We'd see them in court just losing their shit.»

Not exact matches

Asked by TechCrunch senior writer Jordan Crook what types of technology he hoped to see implemented on the court in the future, Curry joked, «One would be to just help me dunk more.»

Kodie from TLC's «sister wives», the polygamist serial was talking about filing court case for recognition of polygamous marriages coz gay ones are... just wait and see the incesters, pedoists, animalists, everyone will join in

When I experienced that cathedral and city as a child, I saw an ordered, peaceful, gentle England in which two things were entirely taken for granted among all classes: that the courts were just and that we were free people.

If angry atheists find the Ground Zero cross makes them sick and they are angry they have to battle it in court, tell them just wait till you stand before that God you don't believe in, explaining why they didn't believe in Him and see how sick they feel then!

I have talked to prosecutors around the country, and this was my own experience as well, that just about every time we saw a pastor come to court in a supportive role, he was there on behalf of the perpetrator.

Stauskas, the No. 8 pick in the 2014 Draft, has seen the court very little during his rookie season in Sacramento, averaging just 3.6 ppg while shooting only 27 % from the three - point line.

My interest in this whole issue comes from the fact that if our law courts especially the highest court in Ghana, Supreme Court that is supposed to be final place in the country to deliver justice to all manner of persons regardless of one's political affiliation, religious beliefs, ethnic background etc in a just and fair manner is now seen to be turning into a place where citizens of Ghana who may belong to certain political affiliations do not feel confident or have trust in their handling of critical national issues in view of some of these «partisan» pronouncements on the part of some justices, then where would we be heading towards as a coucourt in Ghana, Supreme Court that is supposed to be final place in the country to deliver justice to all manner of persons regardless of one's political affiliation, religious beliefs, ethnic background etc in a just and fair manner is now seen to be turning into a place where citizens of Ghana who may belong to certain political affiliations do not feel confident or have trust in their handling of critical national issues in view of some of these «partisan» pronouncements on the part of some justices, then where would we be heading towards as a couCourt that is supposed to be final place in the country to deliver justice to all manner of persons regardless of one's political affiliation, religious beliefs, ethnic background etc in a just and fair manner is now seen to be turning into a place where citizens of Ghana who may belong to certain political affiliations do not feel confident or have trust in their handling of critical national issues in view of some of these «partisan» pronouncements on the part of some justices, then where would we be heading towards as a country?

Law is not just what you are just seeing in the paper until it has been interpreted by a court of law.

«We saw what happens when the courts draw the lines,» Cuomo said in a radio interview just now.

Freeman says the law and court rulings specifically require government meetings to be in the presence of each other in an open setting so the public can not just hear them, but see them and see who may be «whispering in their ear.»

But accuracy issues mean you won't see them used in court just yet, Fierer says.

Plucky paralegals will definitely want to sit in on some court cases alongside Phoenix Wright, especially seeing as Apollo Justice is ready to round out the six part series on 3DS in just a few months.

So Thanos harnessed that power of revenger in an attempt to literally court Death, and we're going to see just how far he's willing to go once Avengers: Infinity War finally hits theaters.

Nonetheless, may he rest in peace (see also here), perhaps also knowing that his forever stance of «[making] no apologies for the fact that his methods were too complex for most of the teachers whose jobs depended on them to understand,» just landed his EVAAS in serious jeopardy in court in Houston (see here) given this stance was just ruled as contributing to the violation of teachers» Fourteenth Amendment rights (i.e., no state or in this case organization shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process [emphasis added]-RRB-.

They just lost a major case in Dutch court which saw Internet Providers lift restrictions to the Pirate Bay.

In paperwork submitted to the US court and seen by The Register, the DoJ claimed Apple's appeal was just trying to...

Located just steps away from the Vaci Utca, Millennium Court, Budapest - Marriott Executive Apartments are within walking distance of countless things to see and do here in Hungary's vibrant capital - from the Chain Bridge and the Danube River the Buda Castle.

Target Center — Come see the NBA's Minnesota Timberwolves or the WNBA's Minnesota Lynx take the ball down the court in this massive arena, just eight miles south of the hotel.

After sending a complaint via Apple in January, PUBG Corp are now taking them to court and listing 25 specific characteristics, that range from «Yep that's a Battle Royale game and you'll get absolutely nowhere with that one», through to «Sure, but you've just described an online video game» and the occasional bit of «Yeah, I kind of see where you're coming from with this one.

Depending on where visitors stand, they can see 225 versions of themselves, or the artworks in the Avery Court outside the door, or something standing off to the side, or just a blank white wall.

I may just be cynical, but the two trees thing sounds like a repeat of what the «surviving sandy» show was for industry city in terms of disingenuous PR... they've been pretty aggressively courting startups in some of their dumbo properties at the expense of artists that have had studios there for 5, 10, 15 years only to see sudden rent hikes.

Just go ahead and build it and see if the regulators can make the regulations stick in court.

Just as a follow - up to my post in # 43, it may interest people to see the response of the plaintiff (Mr Dimmock) after the UK court case against AIT, his words reported here from the BBC news website:

I can just see Dick Lindzen — or for that matter, myself — in court being tried on racketeering charges for exercising our academic and political freedom.

And in case you did not see the ruling, a US court just ruled that EPA was within its legal rights to pursue the Greenhouse Gas Rules.

Just like the issue you raise in your post, it all comes down to what we mean and what we want when we talk about open courts in the age of the internet when anything that can be seen can be copied and shared.

Increasingly what we see in the courts is a rising number of people who represent themselves with measurably worse outcomes than if they had retained a lawyer, and many more who are just not seeking justice at all because of legal costs.

Trump also assailed «the 13 Angry Democrats in charge of the Russian Witch Hunt» while praising the «court system in place that actually protects people from injustice... and just wait till the courts get to see your unrevealed conflicts of interest!»

The 13 Angry Democrats in charge of the Russian Witch Hunt are starting to find out that there is a Court System in place that actually protects people from injustice... and just wait «till the Courts get to see your unrevealed Conflicts of Interest!

The good news there is the field is sufficiently complex to thoroughly exercise your gray matter (see, for example, David Fischer's analysis of the LinkLine litigation to be argued shortly before the Supreme Court), which means you're not just getting a job, but getting smarter too (case in point: before becoming an Internet marketer for lawyers I worked at Kaye Scholer and frequently saw Milton Handler, a name partner and guru of the antitrust bar, still coming to work well into his 90's).

As seen in this case, an individual can ask a court for a remedy that is «appropriate and just in the circumstances.»

Considering That the Supreme Court is not always the primary court of practice for this group of lawyers, I believed it would be fascinating to see how included the group of 66 lawyers in Chambers» list of leading appellate legal representatives have actually just recently remained in Supreme Court lawsCourt is not always the primary court of practice for this group of lawyers, I believed it would be fascinating to see how included the group of 66 lawyers in Chambers» list of leading appellate legal representatives have actually just recently remained in Supreme Court lawscourt of practice for this group of lawyers, I believed it would be fascinating to see how included the group of 66 lawyers in Chambers» list of leading appellate legal representatives have actually just recently remained in Supreme Court lawsCourt lawsuits.

Such an attempt has just failed in the High Court which had taken a transfer of one of the Chester cornucopia of consumer credit cases (see NLJ 26 June 2009 p 923)-- the test case of McGaffick v Royal Bank of Scotland plc [2009] EWHC 2386, [2009] All ER (D) 71 Oct in which the lender had told the consumer that the existence of information on his default at the agencies might impair his ability to obtain credit or other financial facilities such as current accounts for a period of up to six years.

The matter is a key one for lawyers in the province, who have been eager to see just how the courts will deal with changes to the wording related to summary judgment under the revised Rules of Civil Procedure.

The Court elided the idea of the rationale for extending human rights protection to those groups identified by the prohibited grounds (which, as we have just seen and as the Court itself noted, is the idea of their vulnerability in virtue of the group characteristic) with the idea of the various contexts in which the Code seeks to protect those so identified as vulnerable, e.g. housing, service provision and employment.

While this is not a surprise in light of the Court's previous case - law, it remains noteworthy to see just how broad the Court construes the permissibility of such a request.

Blocher argues that while this makes sense as a way of allocating decisionmaking authority between trial and appellate courts based on their relative strengths, he does not see how those arguments apply at all to instant replay in sports, which he characterizes as «just appeals of a different kind.»

were sitting with several other lawyers in the lawyers» lounge in a Brampton court when a court librarian asked just the three men, two of whom wore their hair in dreadlocks, if she could see their IDs to verify they were lawyers.

While agreeing with much of the Briggs proposals it seems odd to differentiate an online resolution from any other court and I do not see why the online solution in the court process is not just another part of the process for smaller claims.

And I just got back from China about two months ago where I saw the Hangzhou Internet Court, where they are using technology in some very exciting ways to lower the bar for accessing the courts, enabling people to participate remotely.

The Court also held that it was reasonable for the Tribunal to have considered the practices of other organizations in its analysis «to see how other religious organizations balance rights and whether they impose qualifications of religious or morality conformance for all job functions or just for certain ones related to leadership.»

I really think by the end of this year you are going to see 30, 40 active ODR initiatives in the US, working with legal service bureaus, working with courts, expanding access and I think it's just going to grow from there.

If reference is made to what Counsel for the KRG also described as the embodiment of customary international law, namely the 2004 Convention (see Lord Bingham's comments to which I have just referred), Article 7 is clear in providing that «a state can not invoke immunity from jurisdiction in a proceeding before a court of another state with regard to a matter or case if it has expressly consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by the court with regard to the matter or case» either «(a) by international agreement; (b) in a written contract; or (c) by a declaration before the court or by a written communication in a specific proceeding.»

«This is something of a unique situation, and it remains to be seen just how long delays overseas have to be before the English court is willing to step in,» it added.

When Mr. Crane saw himself on the video commenting that the person in photograph number four looked like the person who robbed him, Mr. Crane testified in Court that just because the eyes look like the robber, it does not mean that the person in photograph four was in fact the person who robbed him.

For additional sources asserting that federal courts grant summary judgment more frequently than state courts, see Howard B. Stravitz, Recocking the Removal Trigger, 53 S.C. L. Rev. 185, 185 n. 1 (2002)(«[F] ederal courts are more likely to grant summary judgment to defendants»); JoEllen Lind, «Procedural Swift»: Complex Litigation Reform, State Tort Law, and Democratic Values, 37 Akron L. Rev. 717, 769 (2004)(differing state and federal summary judgment standards «make it much more likely that a defendant in federal court will obtain summary judgment than a defendant in state court»); Kristen Irgens, Wisconsin Is Open for Business or Business Just As Usual?

«Court weighs jury - selection survey lawsuit»: The Providence Journal today contains an article that begins, «The Providence Journal yesterday told the Rhode Island Supreme Court that the public should be able to see written questions during jury selection just as if the same questions had been asked out loud in open court.&rCourt weighs jury - selection survey lawsuit»: The Providence Journal today contains an article that begins, «The Providence Journal yesterday told the Rhode Island Supreme Court that the public should be able to see written questions during jury selection just as if the same questions had been asked out loud in open court.&rCourt that the public should be able to see written questions during jury selection just as if the same questions had been asked out loud in open court.&rcourt.»

She prepares for and completes a marathon without a stumble or fuss in her legal practice and if you didn't follow her on social media you would see her around the court or office without a clue that she had just completed a marathon.

Keller sees this as just another efficiency in the Kentucky court system, which has already done away with bail bondsmen, records court proceedings with audio and video (instead of relying on court reporters) and has implemented video arraignments.