Sentences with phrase «see this in court because»

Not exact matches

But tens of thousands of student borrowers could see their debt wiped out, because at least one private lending company's paperwork is either lost or disorganized — and therefore it can't actually prove in court that the debts actually still exist.

We expect that to happen again — particularly because the jury was prohibited from knowing about these court rulings in favor of Gawker, prohibited from seeing critical evidence gathered by the FBI and prohibited from hearing from the most important witness, Bubba Clem.

We will end up in divorce court because I refuse to see her, respect her and love her as she is, and she refuses to conform to my fantasies of my imaginary her.

The reality is 65 million people voted for Trump... and while a lot of those votes came from people who were legitimately frustrated with both political parties and wanted someone to shake up the system, and a lot of votes cam from traditional doctrinaire Republican voters who held their nose and voted for the guy because they wanted a tax cut, and other voters were pseudo-moralistic Evangelical hypocrites who wanted to reward McConnell for STEALING Merrick Garland's Supreme Court seat, there were a whole lot of Trump voters — including a lot of voters from Pennsylvania's «T» — who voted for Trump because they are racist, white supremicist xenophobes who saw in Trump someone who spoke their language and would «make america great again» (read «make america WHITE again»).

The judge asked if I agreed with my attorney, and my attorney had to elbow me in the ribs because he could see my attention was riveted not on the judge but instead upon the bombshell babe doing the court recording.

But before you leave, you ask your coach to call over your teammates, who are bawling in various states of disbelief out on the court, keeping their distance because seeing any more might send them over the edge.

For the previous two years, whenever Michelle was frustrated or angry on the court, whenever her high school coach yanked her midway through the third quarter because he didn't believe in stars or 40 - point scoring nights, all she had to do was look up in the stands and see her mother forming that little T with her forefingers.

The Mississippi State game was closer than it might have been because Ireland admired the fortitude shown by the Maroons and their coach, Babe McCarthy, in coming north to play against an integrated team in defiance of a court injunction (see box, page 113).

Add in the possibility that sideline personnel responsible for monitoring athletes for signs of concussion, such as team doctors and athletic trainers, or coaches and parent volunteers, may be away from the sideline attending to other injured athletes when a player sustains a high force blow, or, even if they are watching the field / court / rink, may miss significant impacts because they occur away from the play, and one can see why better concussion detection methods are needed.

There are runaway dads, often unconfident in their parenting role, and excluded fathers, desperate to see their children but prevented from doing so because the acrimony of the split makes any court order unenforcable.

Deputy Senate President Ike Ekweremadu said God gave the PDP victory at the Supreme Court because «God has seen so much suffering in Nigeria that is why he gave us victory.

In papers submitted by the UK Government last year in the case and seen by the BHA, the Government attempted to argue that there is no breach of EU law because «if a teacher brought a claim against a school (on the basis that the school, as an employer, had discriminated against them in their remuneration, for example), then the court or tribunal would consider the legislation in this wider contexIn papers submitted by the UK Government last year in the case and seen by the BHA, the Government attempted to argue that there is no breach of EU law because «if a teacher brought a claim against a school (on the basis that the school, as an employer, had discriminated against them in their remuneration, for example), then the court or tribunal would consider the legislation in this wider contexin the case and seen by the BHA, the Government attempted to argue that there is no breach of EU law because «if a teacher brought a claim against a school (on the basis that the school, as an employer, had discriminated against them in their remuneration, for example), then the court or tribunal would consider the legislation in this wider contexin their remuneration, for example), then the court or tribunal would consider the legislation in this wider contexin this wider context.

Any sentence imposed by the court should not be seen as an attempt by judges to muzzle journalists because freedom must go with exercising responsibility which was lacking in the case of Montie FM 3.

On the Judge's explanation that he failed to exhaust internal redress mechanisms adequately before heading for the court, Mr. Crabbe said, «I see it very differently because in one the party's defense, they said that the NPP is a private organisation and when something is happening in it no court can interfere.

There is nowhere in the constitution that any ministerial portfolio has been created... So far as they have ministerial roles and functions, the only Minister who has been given constitutional recognition is the office of the Attorney General so with due respect to him, I do not see how he will have any serious argument to press home either in the court or within Parliament because it is pathetic... I am afraid his argument is jejune.

Share this story Leave a comment What others are reading Gov» t handing over mission schools: See you in court, minority warns Women are happier being single than men because relationships are hard work Airtel and Tigo begin integration Airtel, Tigo begin integration with new name Source: myjoyonline.com

Hearing officers were the Legislature's contribution to the enforcement unit and are seen by good government groups as an uncesscary hoop to jump through because cases against violators must also be presented in State Supreme Court.

We are seeing some small steps in this direction, but our courts still have a long way to go to better ensure that innocent people are not punished because of flaws in this very influential type of evidence.

He may not see very many basketball players in his classroom, but Creighton University physics professor Gintaras Duda, Ph.D., says they are instinctual physicists because of what it takes to make the perfect shot on the court, particularly the 3 - pointer.

Chapman: Yeah, and that's a good piece of work and what it did for me — to go on to continue that thought about the way in which it was an education — is what I saw was that it was possible for a complicated scientific subject to be discussed in front of a lay audience, not be patronizing to the lay audience, get across a lot of information and excite people because the local people were meeting outside the court and they were saying, «Well did you hear the things about the bacterial flagellum?»

Imagine what it was like in swimming class or when we played basketball in gym class and I prayed to be called out for shirts and not skins because I didn't want any one seeing my man - boobs and ab flab jiggling all over the court.

It was all I could do to obtain my freedom.I knew the Mayor and Court Clerk the Sheriff, and Most of the County Comissioners and State law makers and many Federal Reps from Around the Nation, and some Militray Officals from The US and other Nations, I had a small Photo Ablume, I was able to show, After being treated as a criminal and having my rights trampled on I was let go, the people who was in charge of the shelter where I was wisked off to in the Middle of the night, housed most substance abuse people, and those who are homeless, all of htis because of the great healing low cost product Kefir, I later returned in 2010 a Neighbor had Breat Cancer, She tired the kefir and had great results, my Son was relucent to try it, So I added it to salad as a dressing, he recently got his degree in Computer tech and is preparing to go for his BA this month, My cronological age is 70 evryone take me for 40 - 45, I have not seen a doctor for any health issue since the 80's except dental repair, and cleaning, The question of Constipation I have heard will result if the fermentation is longer then two or three days, But if issues do occure, a one day fermentation will correct it.Hope to get a following, for my unique expereinces and discovries, kefir is a healing product, The one I have comes from Kazastan.

I do, because I see it everyday in family court.

«That court taught me hard work, sacrifice, teamwork, humility... and leadership,» he added, plus, «how to deal with people in social situations» and «responsibility off the court [because] if you made a bad decision, someone would see it.»

Because that year the U.S. Supreme Court issued its most important ruling on the topic, in San Antonio v. Rodriguez (see «Fool's Gold,» legal beat, Summer 2015).

The additional 10 % tax generally does not apply to payments that are: • Paid after you separate from service during or after the year you reach age 55; • Annuity payments; • Automatic enrollment refunds; • Made as a result of total and permanent disability; * • Made because of death; • Made from a beneficiary participant account; • Made in a year you have deductible medical expenses that exceed 7.5 % of your adjusted gross income; * • Ordered by a domestic relations court; or • Paid as substantially equal payments over your life expectancy.For more info see: https://www.tsp.gov/PDF/formspubs/tsp-780.pdf Enjoy your retirement!

We're really interested to see the way that the court interprets the responsible lending provisions under the National Consumer Credit Protection Act and how they might apply to book up, because we think that there might be opportunities to strengthen the regulation of book up and to really bring in some further protections for the most vulnerable consumers.

In my opinion the discovery process of a court case would be illuminating, because we would finally get to see all the data on both sides of the argument.

The lawsuit in Missouri courts may have had some reasonable chance of success because citizens of the «Show Me» state have seen the dangers of metallic smelting.

Increasingly what we see in the courts is a rising number of people who represent themselves with measurably worse outcomes than if they had retained a lawyer, and many more who are just not seeking justice at all because of legal costs.

In criminal proceedings, it is well - established that a stay for abuse of process may arise either because it is no longer possible to have a fair trial (limb one); or because it offends the court's sense of justice and propriety to try the accused in the particular circumstances of the case (limb two), see R v Maxwell [2010] UKSC 48, [2011] 4 All ER 941, per Lord Dyson SCJ at [13In criminal proceedings, it is well - established that a stay for abuse of process may arise either because it is no longer possible to have a fair trial (limb one); or because it offends the court's sense of justice and propriety to try the accused in the particular circumstances of the case (limb two), see R v Maxwell [2010] UKSC 48, [2011] 4 All ER 941, per Lord Dyson SCJ at [13in the particular circumstances of the case (limb two), see R v Maxwell [2010] UKSC 48, [2011] 4 All ER 941, per Lord Dyson SCJ at [13].

I suppose it would be interesting (for no useful purpose) to see when the summary was put up because, as as it says in bold, at the top of the summary: «Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch) for information purposes only.»

This is so because, in its previous case law, the Court often refers to the duty of solidarity in the context of the application of the loyalty clause stipulated in Article 4 (3) TEU (see e.g. Joined Cases 6/69 and 11/69, para. 16).

[37] Further, the plaintiff submits other sufficient reasons to commence action in Supreme Court were the insurer's denial of coverage because the forces were insufficient to cause injury; and because the plaintiff was allegedly a worker, which if proven and given the defendant was, would see the action statute barred pursuant to s. 10 (1) of the WCA.

We say this because the division of powers part of the judgement (commencing at para 98) is full of all sorts of references to two levels of government (see e.g. para 141) and similar comments about «interlocking federal and provincial schemes» that make it abundantly clear that this Court has given no thought to the space within which indigenous laws may operate within the modern constitutional order (for recognition that the law making authority of aboriginal peoples pre-dated the Crown's acquisition of sovereignty, was not extinguished by that acquisition of sovereignty and was not impaired by the division of legislative powers between the federal and provincial governments in 1982 see Campbell v British Columbia (2000), 189 DLR (4th) 333 (BCSC) and Justice Deschamps in Beckman v Little Salmon / Carmacks First Nation, [2010] 3 SCR 103 at para 97).

Moreover, one could imagine different judges concluding (1) that court fees are never permissible or (2) that exemptions are not always necessary or (3) that this particular fees regime was reasonable because it allowed for exemptions for impoverished litigants; indeed, the regime aimed to strike a delicate balance between the interests of individual litigants and the public interest in effective, efficient access to justice (see Rothstein J.'s dissent, paras. 103 - 112).

The General Court struck down the sanctions against PMOI in all three cases, because they were adopted in breach of PMOI's rights of defence (see here for further information).

In reviewing the trial judge's order, the Court of Appeals took offense at the comment, feeling that the trial court had unfairly lashed out at the appellate judges because precedent precluded the judge from resolving the case as he sawCourt of Appeals took offense at the comment, feeling that the trial court had unfairly lashed out at the appellate judges because precedent precluded the judge from resolving the case as he sawcourt had unfairly lashed out at the appellate judges because precedent precluded the judge from resolving the case as he saw fit.

Contrary to all the participants in the proceedings, the national court had suggested that EU law was applicable to the case because landscape protection could not be seen to «stand alone as a concept separate from the protection of the environment», as a number of EU rules based on the environmental competence of the Union would show (para 10).

«I don't think anyone wants to see a victim not get to see their accused person have their day in court because of a procedural matter,» she says.

But because of the time difference, you'll have to get up early to see a Spanish court in... [more]

Because even though we've had more experience than most of the people I see in court, we still face judges in our own cases who, at first sight, expect nothing but foolishness from us.

At that point I find it was reasonable for the plaintiff to have commenced the action in this Court because he was reasonably entitled to see the impact of the accident on his prior condition.

I spent a lot of time in the court room, and because I was in federal court I didn't often see self - represented litigants.

The historic gap, which in the past has been canyon-esque as I'm fond of saying, this is where the courts developed the idea of fiduciary duty because as there were such dependence on the part of the client on the service provider because the client doesn't know and the client can't be expected to know whether or not they're being treated fairly or properly or what have you to getting good, you're getting good services, and I don't think that gap will ever close entirely but we are seeing the purchasers of legal services becoming more knowledgeable and more sophisticated, there is.

«The focus on Cronic is opening up a lot of different possibilities because courts are deciding — rightfully in my mind — that the types of systemic deficiencies we see around the country are Cronic violations,» Carroll says.

Perhaps because of that, observers say a few lawsuits are starting to see success in the courts.

CAMPBELL: The difficulty in talking about the big cases, I look at the little cases, and part of my concern is that where you may see some of the court decisions that become problematic for the areas in which you are involved because, think of the companies, and they may be reasonable size but not huge, that don't have an in - house IT person, don't have an in - house counsel and maybe cloud computing for servers, and they have got a major piece of litigation and they don't have a policy.

I think if I look forward five years, if there isn't a private enterprise group that does this, the courts are going to have to assist in what I call a mediative process to drive consensus at an early stage, because we can well see that, as we move from this area that has been adversarial to a more co-operative area, you need some neutral assistance to drive a consensus and perhaps agreement.

This has been repeated... see, for example, per Lord Diplock in Davis v Johnson [1979] AC 264, [1978] 2 WLR 553, 326F where he cited what Scarman LJ said in Tiverton Estates Ltd v Wearwell Ltd [1975] Ch 146, [1974] 2 WLR 176 at 172 — 173 and 196 respectively, viz: «If, therefore, throwing aside the restraints of Young v Bristol Aeroplane, one division of the [Court of Appeal] should refuse to follow another because it believed the other division of the court to be wrong, there would be a risk of confusion and doubt arising where there should be consistency and certaCourt of Appeal] should refuse to follow another because it believed the other division of the court to be wrong, there would be a risk of confusion and doubt arising where there should be consistency and certacourt to be wrong, there would be a risk of confusion and doubt arising where there should be consistency and certainty.