(1) Cess's mathematical error in 1976 being followed by many researchers (
see the previous post IPCC's overestimation of climate sensitivity.)
This term was coined by Richard Tol (in the context of climate, anyways),
see this previous post IPCC as a knowledge monopoly.
Not exact matches
For background on the
IPCC emissions scenarios,
see this
previous post at Climate Etc..
Even if it has been warmer at times during the current and
previous interglacials, showing that the forcing is unprecedented, rising and currently overwhelming natural variation can be
seen of itself to be sufficient cause for alarm (that it be overwhelming is not quite what the
IPCC report states but the more than half
post 1950 claim is similar).
What I
saw, in your
previous post — the positive feedback
post, was what I would call «structural criticism» of the
IPCC, and not of individuals.
Then I find that the
IPCC itself says satellite data has been available since 1972 (
see my
previous post above.)