Sentences with phrase «see this question because»

I was glad to see this question because I no sooner started reading this book than I was making notations to read Stegner's CROSSING TO SAFETY -LRB-- even though I did not particularly care for Stgner's book Big Rock Candy Mountain a couple of decades ago.)

Not exact matches

Through my own questioning, it seems like the majority of small businesses do not use LinkedIn because they either do not see it's potential, don't want to take the time to learn, or want to utilize LinkedIn, but taking the time to do so remains on the back burner.

I struggle with that question because I've seen so much.

Because Cavuto holds the titles of managing editor and senior vice president, his public support for Ailes reportedly raised questions as to whether his letter might be seen as a manager inappropriately attempting to influence employees to support Ailes or discouraging other women from coming forward.

I like the format of this book because it lists questions, which you can practice yourself, and you can see suggested answers.

It would be interesting to see how much it would have cost to protect the systems in question, or to change to process that was exploited and compare it to what was lost because of the breach.»

This is a tough question to answer, because I could give you a laundry list of mistakes I see companies making.

The tough questions by Ms. Harris, were closely watched because she is from the San Francisco Bay Area and is seen as a rising political star within the Democratic Party.

I've seen a customer meeting end because sales couldn't answer this opening question: «Can anyone here tell me what our business strategy is?»

The answers to these questions are so important because (as we'll see in next week's article) they might direct your attention to potential competitors as well as potential ideas for topics and messaging.

Disagreement is great because it makes us to question our belief and see it from another angle.

Charles: Right, I think that's a huge demographic question that I haven't seen any really good statistics on because of course most of the boomers are still in their late 50s or 60s, early 70s and they're not yet to the point where the older generation like the boomer parents, the so - called silent generation, which has sold their houses or given them to their offspring, their adult children.

If the crowd doesn't like something, it won't get funded, because when you see those questions coming, and maybe it's negativity in the discussion board, people will do their research, and they'll check it out.

The media coverage of the Tumbler Ridge story, which suggested Chinese workers employed by a Chinese company can only be bad news because the company is likely controlled by the Chinese government, begs the question of why we don't see protests about Filipino or Mexican workers.

And these are questions I ask many of the academics I'm talking with, and I think we'll see universities, colleges and education very positively affected by these technologies, because I think we can educate students around the world.

Maybe it's because I've worked around quite a few Mormons and don't see the big deal in this question.

You're little scene you gave me is patently false because I don't imemdiately jump to the conclusion of materilization, but I guess since this is how you learn, lets go: Chad and Chuckles are walking in the woods Me: Hey cool, a watch, I wonder where it came from Chad: stupid question, it came from god, but I guess if you want to get more specific, someone probably dropped it Me: you're right, lets check to see if someone is missing a watch - Chad and Chuckles head to town, post signs and after no success for many weeks, decide that the person who dropped it probably isn't around.

It's interesting to see how people will find their own truth, dig in their heals and be blind to any other idea... What would Jesus do is an interesting question... I consider my self a Christian and a spiritualist... because I believe it's just not as black and white as one religion or another thinks... there is way more grey area... but a fundamental truths that are a good rule to live life by, wether you are christian or not... treat others the way you want to be treated... do unto others... I am my brothers keeper... all apply.

There's a second very interesting interepretive question that some Muslims will recognize and take up, but others tend to ignore because it's too daunting — they see it as a slippery slope.

So I Listened to all of his sermons read all of his blogs and than decided to leave my number to see if he would really call as he says on his web site, With in 2 hours I recieved a call and DR. Collins never rushed me off the telephone answered all my questions, And After just that one call you can tell he loves and believes in what he does, He wont be for everyone, Because he does talk about damnation and what it takes to get to heaven, And its not from giving ministers our money > I watched the you tube videos of many and he is just for me, everyone has a choice but in listening to his sermons and reading his blogs and than the telephone call this guy is the real deal.

Admittedly, it is a bit different, because one can't really question whether my wife exists, but I hope you'll forgive a somewhat flawed analogy, and see the point I am trying to make.

So, as you can see, you're question is flawed because you are as.suming the atheist comes to this site to jeer and name call when you are only highlighting and asking a specific type of atheist that is neither the dominant form nor the type of atheist you generally get into threads with.

I am especially grateful for this link because I was so disappointed in the only other two responses I had seen to Kevin DeYoung's questions: those of Matthew Vines and John Shore.

I guess my question is do you believe the reason most don't accept the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob is because they have not really seen a manifestation of the Power of God in their lives and especially in the lives of those who believe.

We have not been going to a building regularly for some time now and I have seen how people have questioned our «spiritual well - being» because of what they see on the outside, looking for our «badge».

We are left asking questions in a process of interrogation that is partly, though not entirely, self - interrogation, to which we see no easy end; but this may be as it is because the mysteries that set our inquiring in motion have their authority over us, thus continually to disturb our minds, only because they do touch what is ultimate, which is at once within and yet wholly beyond our comprehension.

The question has often been left unanswered because the theologians have failed to see that this is a problem which is not peculiar to Christianity, but which belongs to the fundamental structure of our natural Being.»

For these questions, I have the best answer, «there is no heaven, because nobody is seen going to heaven», have you?

It is statements like yours that scare me the most because not only does it attribute bad deeds to outside forces, detaching humanity from its own actions, but it gives those who can «detect» the demons a mistaken sense of dominion over all others too «blinded» to see things your way, and countless followers who will not question your actions either.

Bultmann seized these ideas because he saw in them a portrait of man without God, and because they seemed likely to awaken man to the possibility of hearing the answer to his existential question in the New Testament.

I know at this point its sort of kicking a dead horse, because I know we've both agreed that clearly we'll see what we want to see but your answer just begged the question, so this friend of yours is he a) a christian himself b) had he been praying for a job before c) why did your prayer take an entire week to be fulfilled d) is it a good job?

He must have seen the questioning look on my face because he explained: «For me, baptism and confirmation would be a more personal thing, something between me and God.»

While I am not religious (I will call myself agnostic), and having an IQ well over genius levels, with scientific and mathematical tendencies, let me ask you a few questions, because what I see here are a bunch of people talking about «no evidence» or «proof» of God's existence, therefore He can't possibly exist, existential arguments, which are not arguments, but fearful, clouded alterations of a truth that can not be seen.

In The Brothers Karamazov, things happen around the Grand Inquisitor that answer his questions, but he can not see that because he wants only one form of answer — a severely reduced form that depends on reasoning alone, stripped of faith or emotion.

I don't see it as fence sitting simply because the questions our wonderful minds are able to conjur up are far to big for those very minds to answer.

Those who are offended by the claim that horses or chimps or whales (OFD; also see OOTM 13, WM 49) deserve more respect than the fetus in the early stages of pregnancy usually resort to a type of question - begging which Peter Singer calls «speciesism»: the human fetus in the early stages of pregnancy deserves moral respect just because it is human.

It's the same with most groups, but with the added problem that with a church, they get to demonise you in a rather more literal way and it's the whole of your being that's called into question because it's seen to relate to your relationship with God.

Alise: First, I just want to say that I love this question, because it already indicates a deeper understanding than we often see when talking about mixed faith relationships.

Election results raise questions about Christian right's influence... The EVANGELICALS took over the Republican party when Reagen was president and they have been dictating the agenda ever since... I hope they keep dictating because I want to see the stupid backward republicans become extinct.

Tsarnaev may believe that an attack against one Muslim is an attack against all, but he must then question where he sees himself, because on that day in Boston, he attacked Muslims, too.

I've been hesitant to answer this question at one level because hindsight is 20/20, and it feels a little less than honest to (a) see how things play out and then (b) pronounce how I should have done things differently.

What he sees may vary all the way from his wife's childlike dependence upon her mother's opinion, the mother - in - law's hesitancy to ask him a question directly for fear of his explosive reaction, to the mother - in - law's attempt to downgrade him in his daughter's eyes because of her wish to have a more vital part in her granddaughter's life.

I have seen a dandy appear in the street with his face covered with shaving - lather because a house across the way was on fire; and a woman will run among strangers in her nightgown if it be a question of saving her baby's life or her own.

One of the problems I see in my own congregation and with several on this site is, they do not want to move on, to grow, to mature, to develop, because they instintively know that the answers to some of their questions will not be to their liking.

The question of revelation is a formidable question in the proper sense of the word, not only because it may be seen as the first and last question for faith, but also because it has been obscured by so many false debates that the recovery of a real question in itself constitutes an enormous task.

If you think my questions are quarrlesome then I feel bad for you because you clearly are seeing my critical thinking as a roadblock in your faith.

Jeremy I believe you answered the question in another discussion why God seemed evil by punishing other nations i prefer the word you used which is judgement.God weighs up the hearts and then judges fairly thats not evil in fact he weighs up all the factors before he makes his decision and his decisions are perfect and wise.When he commanded Israel to wipe out other nations it was Gods judgement on these nations because of the evil they had committed in alot of ways its exaggerated because they did nt have Christ to shield them like we have if anything it shows how merciful God is towards us today.In those days gods judgement was quick and immediate.What happened to Israel when they broke the laws God gave them they immediately fell into judgement often resulting in many deaths to there own people until the sins of the people were dwelt with.So even for Gods people it was a conditional on there attitude and actions towards God.Again we see God is merciful to these previous nations that were destroyed as Christ after his crucifiction went and preached to them giving them the opportunity to repent so again we see God is still merciful.His word is true The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness.

I think your question precisely contains the answer of why I fail to see that everything is meaningless because that meaning «is diminished or non existant in the future.»

Because being «non-ignorant» means harassing the first Muslim you see by asking ridiculous questions, then avoiding them like the plague?

[64] These two questions are not asked because owners see their pets as extensions of the family with essentially equal rights and privileges.