Sentences with phrase «see this styled very»

Not exact matches

The fact of the matter is when you talk about central banks, you're talking about powerful institutions rooted in their own management styles and tradition (even if the latter has just now seen a very unusual break) and it's not likely that one person can radically change things, even if he or she wanted to.

But if you look at the mean distribution, you see very different management styles and approaches to leadership between genders.

I worried that the people I saw in managing roles (all men, by the way) had a very different leadership style than I did — more aggressive, less collaborative.

Major Allman told Premier about the kind of work the charity was doing back then: «It was very much seeing people who were homeless and sleeping on the streets and finding dormitory style accommodation.»

He should NOT have apologized and instead declared in a very clear style, «See?

We saw above that Mark 9.1, although introduced by it, owes its present form to Mark, and we must recognize the very real possibility that the characteristic early Christian conviction that the Lord who spoke is the Lord who speaks has led to an imitation of the very style of that speech, at any rate to a limited extent.

I have very rarely seen anyone do this style with a genuine concern for the people they are «trying to reach».

The danger, as I see it, of maintaining traditional styles and practices of faith in a new situation is that their very life and existence will block or reverse an eschatological and dialectical movement of faith.

Funny I never thought of Jesus as having a hercules style body... Just average build... He did work as a capenter and the carpenters I know have good muscle tone... by are not body builder status, Hercules built to excess... They are just like a average farmer, strong and even in muscle tone... Jesus's whole life was about being humble and coming from the low end of the society... he was born with the animals in a very humble place... I do not see him as a super strong human... but then being the son of God, he would have had super powers if he wanted them... he just did not need them...

What in an older kind of philosophy would have been called the chain - of - cause - and - effect is here seen as being very much richer; it is a congeries of occasions, events, pressures, movements, routes, which come to focus at this or that point, and which for their explanation require some principle that has brought and still is bringing each of them, rather than some other possible occurrence, into this particular concrete moment of what we commonly style «existence».

love your serving style I believe my mother had a very similar recipe that she used to make I believe I am going to make up some and share with my friends thanks for sharing come see what we shared at http://shopannies.blogspot.com

Meanwhile for authentic Swiss - style muesli, the kind we used to call «Swiss breakfast» at school, I have a very good recipe here, so you see, quite different — but equally delicious.

It's from my home region, Brittany which is situated on the west coast of France (that weird arm going into the sea you see on French maps; — RRB --RRB- These scallops Breton style are not very difficult to make, the annoying part being cleaning the scallops.

goodness i can't believe it people will still defend him.You know something when Giroud misses many chances like at Monaco i did not criticize him even based on that you know why?its because he has always not been clinical.The only way a team can improve is by indentifying its problems and solving them.Arsenal has Giroud as the main cf and Welbeck as backup to him.Giroud has done well scoring some goals some too important but collectively he does more harm than good.Do not use moments to judge a player judge him based on content.Giroud does not excel in many games than he excels in games.As a main cf you need to be consistent.I see people here saying Giroud can not dribble he cant do this he cant do that but its a bit crazy to criticize him for that because every player has his own style.Giroud limitations as a player costs arsenal and will cost us a lot.Most importantly his poor finishing which has cost us several times.Not good enough.His style of play is ok for us but a striker who can take on players and run behind defences very well would make us very strong and also should be clinical.For Welbeck he needs to works on his finishing and composure by doing the basic things right.He rushes infront of goal too much.For now he is just above average.However he can excel if he works on improving.Giroud and Welbeck will always be a pain in arsenal's neck for most part.Some will call me stupid but hey at least i want to analyze the problem.People may support Giroud or Welbeck to lead the line next season but as the saying goes if you fool me once shame on you but if you fool me twice shame on me.Will you let Giroud and Welbeck fool you again?

We have seen Vardy occasionally drift out wide for England, but it doesn't suit his style of play very well and so he wouldn't be used to the best of his ability, if played out wide under Wenger.

We'd love to see a Playoff rematch between those two as the different styles being played is very intriguing.

It's hard to rate South American clubs because I don't see them play regularly ad they play a very different style of football and it is hard to compare say, Cruzeiro to Arsenal, as they never play one another.

Another thing i complain about that you dropped ramsey and i like that guy and his energetic style (even so i go mad when i see him losing a ball very easily)

We didn't see JJ's very aggressive striking style against Rose and JJ will never be that aggressive with Rose because of Rose grappling ability.

«He is a talented and capable defender who can play either side of defence and having seen first - hand his work rate we feel that he will fit into both our style of play and our team culture very well.»

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

The man who won an amazing eight eight titles and two Champions League trophies has proved since retiring that he is a great reader of the game so for him to see the progression and the right balance in this Arsenal team, while still keeping the wonderful fluid style that Wenger is famous for, is very encouraging.

Considering that we've only seen the pair play together on rare occasions so far, it will be interesting to see how well they compliment each other at the back and work together given that they are two players with very similar playing styles.

I know it's a negative comment but interested to see who people think are the weakest links in the team, For me I would say Wilshere & Arteta, For obvious reasons Mikel given he has very little if any physical presence to dominate the centre of the park and Jack purely because it seems our style just does not suite the lad..

I remember some of you posted pics of our midfield and praised ev some drew comparison with lucho, ev has a style that is very similar to the Barca way, but he loves defensive stability and because we lack the true Barca MF to do it we are like this, we all agree some players must go, but carefully looking at things you see that most of what ev does was done by pep (of course not as boldly) but his style looks ugly and boring, guys let us give him a chance it hurts but let us do it, let us see the big picture, he may not be capable of beautiful football but at least while we build we are confident of results which we need, when we rebuild then let us fire him, but if this is down to the players then we are making a mistake, I am not asking anyone to change but just stop insulting and criticising ev, patience is the key.

Not only are his comments about a big club needing options up front very true, it is clear that our manager sees Giroud as an integral part of the Arsenal team and our style of play.

I really feel for him.He was treated without respect I remember saying here that our season also depended on him because we knew Welbeck and Giroud were not good enough.However, he came and didn't really impress in the CF role but impressed on the wing but I felt he would've done very well in the Ozil role earlier in the season.He used to be an AMF for Deportivo but they changed him to a CF.This is why I believe he shouldn't have been signed in the first place.It was poor business from Arsenal to sign him because we needed a typical killer CF.Lucas is a more of a No. 10 style kind of player as he played there for Deportivo prior to the season where he played CF.If you look at his style of play you can see that he's not your typical CF.think Wenger benched him because he didn't solve our CF problem but I guess it's not Lucas» fault.

This has made United very easy to counter and control, and although we seem to be getting away with playing this style of football for now, most of us would rather see that cavalier style that sent shivers through other teams when they knew they had us next.

If it was up to me, i would sign fabinho as cover for valencia and promote tuanzebe... would have loved to see varela but clearly he is too offensive for mourinho which is very ironic because varela's playing style is similar to that of marcelo, i realy hope he fine tunes his defensive qualities in germany nd comes back a better player..fosu - mensah would be a world beater if mourinho puts him under pogba's wing, nd memphis just needs self belief again and full trust from the coach to make him deadly again..

Last season both meetings of the sides saw an over 2.5 goals ticket cash as the two sides free flowing styles saw created very open games.

This is precisely the reason why Benteke was seen as surplus to requirements at Liverpool given the fluid style now being successfully employed by Klopp; and it was very worrying to hear Bilic say that he was an admirer of the Belgian.

I have no grudge with LVG but I just don't like or understnd he's style of play.All I hear from him is philosopy while others are getting the results I watched Anthonial Valencia playing for Ecuardo as a right winger & he played very well & yet in LVG «s team he plays at right back for what reason?I see no reason to blame players bt lvg for his so called philosophy

As for Diaby, he might also give us a big surprise next season, for now we can all say that he is incompetent, he is actually my worst arsenal player but i see him having some special skills and very typical style on his footbal, DIABY COULD ONLY BE THE WORST OR THE BEST, HE CANT BE IN THE MIDDLE.Either his skills would explose and he will be cherrished by the crowd or it wont then he'll be blamed for it.

Graphic designer Jane Crick has a very distinctive style — you know a Jane Crick illustration when you see it.

I am also a very keen photographer and this is my third year of a «photo a day» project which has really seen my photography grow and develop into a distinctive style.

Moxie Girlz Dolls, which I first saw over a year ago, has come up with newer styles and I am glad to say they still meet with myapproval.Yes, they are a tad more «grown up» than what I am used to but kids start looking towards older dolls and sad to say there are very few out there that I can appreciate...

i find her very sweet and her style matches her music but sometimes it would be nice to see her in simpler clothes, just to see how that looks

The type of learning you're describing, with open classroom discussion, a lot of choice for students, inquiry - based learning, projects, it seems at odds with the kind of call - and - response, very teacher - directed style that you see at a lot of so - called «no excuses» charter schools that produce high test scores with disadvantaged populations.

Is the danger that we see a return to a 1960s -»70s style of progressivism, which was very student - led but sometimes didn't have the same sense of rigor?

I don't have a bucket - style carseat anymore, as both Little and Littlest are in Covertible car seats, but the pictures I have seen for using this as a car seat canopy are very cute!

As you can see, these are two very similar pocket - style cloth diapers.

I consider myself an «Attachment Parenting» - style parent, and I couldn't see how I could ever change this nursing to sleep pattern without completely traumatizing my daughter, so I was so grateful when Michelle helped us create a very gentle plan that has totally worked!

I had never seen such dolls before: breastfeeding dolls (the newborn or toddler attaches to his mother's breast with velcro or a snap fastener, some are actually really cute waldorf style dolls, see below) birthing dolls (the newborn can get in and out of the mother's womb, probably a very good way to show a... Continue reading «Breastfeeding Dolls: Not Your Typical Barbie Doll»

There were many styles of baby rattles in the 19th and early 20th Centuries - from very simple rings with jingling charms to some of the shapes we see to this day.

Even if we did see a return to a Maunder - style low in solar activity, earth's climate is very different now to how it was in the 17th century.

But having worked at Visual Therapy for three years, and seeing how defining a style and organizing a wardrobe can bring confidence, I actually believe our work has very little to do with fashion.

I've not seen any type of «point / counterpoint» style posts by Dr. Greger and agree it would be nice to see the confusion addressed point by point as Dr. Hyman and some others have come out in a very Weston Price style support for saturated fats which flies in the face of all we've read about the dangers of animal fats.

So, it turns out, one of my buddies who I have known for a long time, Jon Bruney, put out an entire DVD that covers training very similar to my Bi-Polar Training methods, but also many other styles of training that you have probably never seen before.

The way you've styled your hair and the flowers together with the dress also reminds me of ballerinas, I saw Carmen a few years ago and the ballerinas wore the same colours and dresses were very similar to this and with black embroidery as well — just way more puffier of course!

I see a lot of white cabinetry and gold accents, which I love as well, we have very similar style xo, Emily