Sentences with phrase «see unprecedented warming»

Even if the entirety of the adjustments were wrong, we still see unprecedented warming over the past 40 years.

Not exact matches

The fishery saw unprecedented reductions in marketable wild - caught urchins after the 2014 warm blob and 2015 El Niño, which decimated kelp forests (the primary food source for urchins) throughout California,» explains Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology researcher Kirk Sato, lead author of the study.

North America and Europe will see slightly lower, though equally unprecedented, warming.

It may have been unprecedented for the Cannes Film Festival to present the Palme D'or to both lead actresses alongside their director when Blue is the Warmest Color won the prize, but you can understand why they made that decision after seeing the film.

Taking again 0C at the X axis and say 30C as the upper limit, we would indeed see a basically flat curve... and that's fortunately what has actually happened and the reason why nobody would have noticed the allegedly unprecedented warming, if we didn't have the observations record.

The DECC used to show the actual temp data CET data set graph (still only 150 years of it) on the DECC website, but following Phil Jones stating in that BBC interview, 3 similar warming periods, and rates of warming in the last 150 years and that you could clearly see this on the graph, the pronouncement by the DECC that this graph showed «unprecedented» man made global warming, seemed ridiculous.

The fraud I see is that the scientists, who know it is not unprecedented, and know from all the past warmings in the last 11k years that a tipping point is not indicated at all, are content to be mute rather than honestly coming forward and publicly correcting the record.

From my point of view, I saw that the climate had varied very widely over the last several thousand years, and in no way did I believe that proxy data (which averages and mutes annual signals) showed that the recent warming was unprecedented over the last 1000 or 2000 years.

«The analysis reveals that the planet today is warmer than it's been during 70 to 80 percent of the last 11,300 years» also tranlates into: «The analysis reveals that the planet today is colder than it's been during 20 to 30 percent of the last 11,300 years» So, actually there's nothing to see here except that during certain periods in the past, the earth was warmer and contrary to all the warmist hype and catastrophism, we are nowhere near something unprecedented.

At some time or another, most people will have seen the hockey stick - the iconic graph which purports to show that after centuries of stable temperatures, the second half of the twentieth century saw a sudden and unprecedented warming of the globe.

Its abstract warns that «projected warming of the Antarctic continent during the 21st century may soon see significant and unusual warming develop across other parts of the Antarctic continent [besides the peninsula]», but no Steigian red spots of supposedly unprecedented warming.

Even if it has been warmer at times during the current and previous interglacials, showing that the forcing is unprecedented, rising and currently overwhelming natural variation can be seen of itself to be sufficient cause for alarm (that it be overwhelming is not quite what the IPCC report states but the more than half post 1950 claim is similar).

But I am now a «lukewarmer» who has yet to see any evidence saying that the current warming is, or is likely to be, unprecedented, fast or tending to accelerate.»

-- http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/global-warming-could-be-causing-dogs-to-become-depressed-say-pet-behaviourists-a6854006.html Leading pet behaviourists say the number of depressed and unsettled dogs they have seen in recent months is unprecedented... A boredom epidemic is sweeping through Britain's dog population — and global warming could be to blame.

A few years later using his special powers, Mikey Mann found an unprecedented warming trend since 1850 — which NOAA had been unable to see any evidence of just a decade earlier.

«With continued global warming, we're going to see more and more of these unprecedented regional conditions, and with them will come more and more costs to humans and the things they value.

Zekes sees the following as «more likely than not (> 50 %)»: «Recent warming is unprecedented over the past millennium.»

4 See, for example, «35 scientific papers: Global sea levels were 1 - 2 meters higher than now for most of the last 7,000 years» (6 February, 2017); «17 new (2017) scientific papers affirm today's warming was not global, unprecedented, or remarkable» (26 January, 2017); «The hockey stick collapse: 60 new (2016) scientific papers affirm today's warming isn't global, unprecedented, or remarkable» (22 December, 2016).

â $ œThe strongest hurricane on record for both the Northern and Southern Hemisphere, unprecedented continuing drought in California, the warmest start to a year that weâ $ ™ ve ever seen, on the heels of what was the warmest full year on record for the globe, â $ ticked off Michael Mann, a climate researcher at Pennsylvania State University.

However, we have seen unprecedented events of exactly this sort recently - the warm spring in the midwest last year may come to mind for you, though you were a bit east of the bullseye.

No warming here, nothing to see, please go home, nothing «unprecedented» going on like the «alarmist warmers» would have you believe, just more global warming fraud.

Recent analyses of instrumental, documentary and proxy climate records, focussing on European temperatures, have also pointed to the unprecedented warmth of the 20th century and shown that the extreme summer of 2003 was very likely warmer than any that has occurred in at least 500 years (Luterbacher et al., 2004; Guiot et al., 2005; see Box 3.6).

The apparent idea is to look at past history of earths temperatures and see if we are in some unprecedented warming period but the temperature history is disputable.

The current warming trend is of particular significance because most of it is extremely likely (greater than 95 percent probability) to be the result of human activity since the mid-20th century and proceeding at a rate that is unprecedented over decades to millennia.1 Earth - orbiting satellites and other technological advances have enabled scientists to see the big picture, collecting many different types of information about our planet and its climate on a global scale.

Put more bluntly, though, we've been told that CAGW is something that is «unprecedented» - > seeing that we've already lived through periods with similar rates of warming, why do we continue to hear that trope?