Sentences with phrase «see valid evidence»

«but I see no valid evidence that it is a cause of positive rather than negative feedback.»

Not exact matches

... There seemed to me to be an ethics of belief whose clear mandate was «Adjust your belief to the evidence,» and I could not see why, if this was valid for common sense and science, it should not be valid for religion also.6

You accept the «leap of faith» as a valid basis for believing in god in the absence of evidence, but fail to see that this makes you a pantheist, because you have to accept that the same leap can be made to any god with equal validity.

If you peeked into the Reddit thread then you'll see that the majority of links used as evidence have now been killed and are no longer valid.

Until that is addressed and people can fully understand that the evidence is valid, I can't see that a majority of people in most countries will support hugely economically damaging climate policies.

We see in you no evidence of foundation for your assertion of how much reduction in CO2 emission may be possible, and if you can construct a valid model for how climate factors determine CO2 levels then you've gone farther than all of science — an astounding feat worthy of a comic book supervillain indeed.

My original point remains valid — if crows exist, seeing a red tulip serves as confirmatory evidence for the proposition that all crows are black.

The Court of Appeal affirmed, following the Federal Court of Appeal's decision in Apotex Inc. v. Allergan Inc., 2016 FCA 155, that «Evidence of the actual state of mind or subjective intention of the parties is irrelevant to the existence of a valid contract and its terms» (See para. 35).

Those who hold them are only able to see evidence to support them and are blind to evidence that they're not valid.