Hopefully the worse is behind us and we will begin to
see warmer temps and less snow.
Not exact matches
Yes I realize the
temp should stay even — I was just
seeing what I could do to provide
warm — but it is unsustainable as I can't keep a stove on for a week!
If convection and evaporation were not present, I could
see the argument being made that a slight increase in Radiation having some
warming effect, however convection and evaporation do exist within the Troposphere and the rate of cooling the two exhibit increases as surface
temps increase.
i am starting to embrace the chunky block heels, and can
see myself in a pair or two come
warmer temps!
And
seeing that I'm beyond excited for
warmer temps and fresh blooms, the day was inspired by all things spring!
While most are thrilled to
see the
warm days continue as we head into the middle of October, I can't help but be just a bit disgusted every time I
see a
temp that starts with a 7 or an 8 in the forecast.
Now that you've probably thrown your winter coats in storage, you have to rely on your spring trenches, denim jackets, and light parkas to keep you
warm until the season
sees steady
temps.
I'm just ready for spring (or at least some sunshine and
warmer temps which I
see on the forecast for this week... thank goodness!).
We don't
see enough of Minnie Driver these days, but she delivers a typically
warm, committed performance as a kindly if undisciplined Welsh schoolmistress putting on a rock opera version of The
Tempest in 1976.
Hammerfest & The Snow White Project Global
warming usually suggests images of wild
tempests and massive floods, but some countries are trying to tap into what they
see as potential benefits of climate change.
The only argument I've
seen along those lines is the one that claims that the vast majority of the CO2 humans are emitting is sequestered in soils, oceans, etc, or used by plants, but that «naturally»
warmer temps result in the release of sequestered CO2.
For example, one might predict that the pattern they
see (wide rings more common) would be prevalent in cooler, wetter parts of Alaska, whereas the opposite pattern (wide rings less common) might be more prevalent in
warmer, drier parts, where
warming may have pushed temperature past critical thresholds to the point where
warm temps become a limiting factor.
I can
see that adding GHGs creates a longer transport time in the air, hence
warming, BUT wouldn't the
warmer temp create a shorter transport time in convection?
See: Inconvenient
Temps: According to NCDC's own data, 2010 was not the
warmest year in the United States, nor even a tie — It ranked 94th!!
it's same as if Tony was showing a mouse eating a cup of grain from the bushel — as proof that: the WHOLE planet is cooler by 0,12 C, because of it — or looking at a bucket of water, and declaring that: the
temp of all the seven seas are
warmer by 0,03 C. I always had binoculars and a telescope, not big one, but understand what can be
seen and what can not.
The DECC used to show the actual
temp data CET data set graph (still only 150 years of it) on the DECC website, but following Phil Jones stating in that BBC interview, 3 similar
warming periods, and rates of
warming in the last 150 years and that you could clearly
see this on the graph, the pronouncement by the DECC that this graph showed «unprecedented» man made global
warming, seemed ridiculous.
The
temps in the Arctic have declined now for a few years and it had
warmed enough that it makes perfect sense that we would
see a lag in the reformation of ice.
I pointed out that the world could well have
seen these
temps / rates before (in fact go back millions of years and it probably did, along with quite a few extinctions), but we're arguing about the
warming today.
I also
saw the clouds were much
warmer, some of the papers I've read say that I am measuring the surface
temp of the cloud when measuring it in IR.
I hate to
see what's gonna happen when oceans are no longer driving
warmer temps.
54 % «believe» the
warming measured over the last 100 yrs is NOT «within the range of natural temperature fluctuation» [means that 46 % thinks that it is within the Natural Range]-- 56 %
see a 50 - 50 chance that global
temps will rise 2 * C or more during the next 50 to 100 yrs.
Wouldn't it be interesting to compare the ten year
temp record of the 114 pristinely sited temperature stations with all the other temperature stations and those closely correlating back measurements looked at to check out the earlier period a decade before to
see whether non - cooling or
warming.
In addition, the
warming we
see is hugely disproportionate, mainly where it is driest and coldest since the increase in water vapor if you look at your mixing ratios will affect where
temps are lowest first.
In terms of keeping you
warm though, even in hOMe which is on the larger spectrum of tiny houses, we stay toasty
warm even when it's -10 F. Granted we don't go all the way down to your
temps but perhaps you can try it without first and
see how it goes?
If we want to
see if YOUR mechanism for ocean
warming is working as proposed, then we need to look for a reducing
temp gradient across the surface layer.
If convection and evaporation were not present, I could
see the argument being made that a slight increase in Radiation having some
warming effect, however convection and evaporation do exist within the Troposphere and the rate of cooling the two exhibit increases as surface
temps increase.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the destabilization depth for methane in near 0 degree C
temps is 200 meters, so the statement that I have
seen here and elsewhere that the methane hydrate is at that depth should not surprise us and should not lead us to think that it is therefore stable — it is right on the edge of destabilizing, any even slight amount of
warming will do so.
As can be
seen, May started out extremely cold in the Central Arctic Basin, with anomalously
warm temps along the coasts of the Beaufort and Kara Seas.
I want to
see a good description of how global
warming works — very detailed, how the models calculate
temp rise due to increased CO2, etc..
Your new role as a Principal
Temps Recruitment Consultant will see you join a warm corporate temps
Temps Recruitment Consultant will
see you join a
warm corporate
temps temps desk.