Sentences with phrase «see warmer temps»

Hopefully the worse is behind us and we will begin to see warmer temps and less snow.

Not exact matches

Yes I realize the temp should stay even — I was just seeing what I could do to provide warm — but it is unsustainable as I can't keep a stove on for a week!
If convection and evaporation were not present, I could see the argument being made that a slight increase in Radiation having some warming effect, however convection and evaporation do exist within the Troposphere and the rate of cooling the two exhibit increases as surface temps increase.
i am starting to embrace the chunky block heels, and can see myself in a pair or two come warmer temps!
And seeing that I'm beyond excited for warmer temps and fresh blooms, the day was inspired by all things spring!
While most are thrilled to see the warm days continue as we head into the middle of October, I can't help but be just a bit disgusted every time I see a temp that starts with a 7 or an 8 in the forecast.
Now that you've probably thrown your winter coats in storage, you have to rely on your spring trenches, denim jackets, and light parkas to keep you warm until the season sees steady temps.
I'm just ready for spring (or at least some sunshine and warmer temps which I see on the forecast for this week... thank goodness!).
We don't see enough of Minnie Driver these days, but she delivers a typically warm, committed performance as a kindly if undisciplined Welsh schoolmistress putting on a rock opera version of The Tempest in 1976.
Hammerfest & The Snow White Project Global warming usually suggests images of wild tempests and massive floods, but some countries are trying to tap into what they see as potential benefits of climate change.
The only argument I've seen along those lines is the one that claims that the vast majority of the CO2 humans are emitting is sequestered in soils, oceans, etc, or used by plants, but that «naturally» warmer temps result in the release of sequestered CO2.
For example, one might predict that the pattern they see (wide rings more common) would be prevalent in cooler, wetter parts of Alaska, whereas the opposite pattern (wide rings less common) might be more prevalent in warmer, drier parts, where warming may have pushed temperature past critical thresholds to the point where warm temps become a limiting factor.
I can see that adding GHGs creates a longer transport time in the air, hence warming, BUT wouldn't the warmer temp create a shorter transport time in convection?
See: Inconvenient Temps: According to NCDC's own data, 2010 was not the warmest year in the United States, nor even a tie — It ranked 94th!!
it's same as if Tony was showing a mouse eating a cup of grain from the bushel — as proof that: the WHOLE planet is cooler by 0,12 C, because of it — or looking at a bucket of water, and declaring that: the temp of all the seven seas are warmer by 0,03 C. I always had binoculars and a telescope, not big one, but understand what can be seen and what can not.
The DECC used to show the actual temp data CET data set graph (still only 150 years of it) on the DECC website, but following Phil Jones stating in that BBC interview, 3 similar warming periods, and rates of warming in the last 150 years and that you could clearly see this on the graph, the pronouncement by the DECC that this graph showed «unprecedented» man made global warming, seemed ridiculous.
The temps in the Arctic have declined now for a few years and it had warmed enough that it makes perfect sense that we would see a lag in the reformation of ice.
I pointed out that the world could well have seen these temps / rates before (in fact go back millions of years and it probably did, along with quite a few extinctions), but we're arguing about the warming today.
I also saw the clouds were much warmer, some of the papers I've read say that I am measuring the surface temp of the cloud when measuring it in IR.
I hate to see what's gonna happen when oceans are no longer driving warmer temps.
54 % «believe» the warming measured over the last 100 yrs is NOT «within the range of natural temperature fluctuation» [means that 46 % thinks that it is within the Natural Range]-- 56 % see a 50 - 50 chance that global temps will rise 2 * C or more during the next 50 to 100 yrs.
Wouldn't it be interesting to compare the ten year temp record of the 114 pristinely sited temperature stations with all the other temperature stations and those closely correlating back measurements looked at to check out the earlier period a decade before to see whether non - cooling or warming.
In addition, the warming we see is hugely disproportionate, mainly where it is driest and coldest since the increase in water vapor if you look at your mixing ratios will affect where temps are lowest first.
In terms of keeping you warm though, even in hOMe which is on the larger spectrum of tiny houses, we stay toasty warm even when it's -10 F. Granted we don't go all the way down to your temps but perhaps you can try it without first and see how it goes?
If we want to see if YOUR mechanism for ocean warming is working as proposed, then we need to look for a reducing temp gradient across the surface layer.
If convection and evaporation were not present, I could see the argument being made that a slight increase in Radiation having some warming effect, however convection and evaporation do exist within the Troposphere and the rate of cooling the two exhibit increases as surface temps increase.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the destabilization depth for methane in near 0 degree C temps is 200 meters, so the statement that I have seen here and elsewhere that the methane hydrate is at that depth should not surprise us and should not lead us to think that it is therefore stable — it is right on the edge of destabilizing, any even slight amount of warming will do so.
As can be seen, May started out extremely cold in the Central Arctic Basin, with anomalously warm temps along the coasts of the Beaufort and Kara Seas.
I want to see a good description of how global warming works — very detailed, how the models calculate temp rise due to increased CO2, etc..
Your new role as a Principal Temps Recruitment Consultant will see you join a warm corporate temps Temps Recruitment Consultant will see you join a warm corporate temps temps desk.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z