Sentences with phrase «see you at the party next»

Hope to see you at the party next week!

Not exact matches

The Liberal party, which at times seems to value youth over experience, could see some blowback at its convention in Halifax next month, Susan Delacourt writes.

But Clinton is far better positioned to keep the abortion rate at the record low it saw under President Obama while the Republican Party works for the next four years to produce the kind of candidate the people of this country deserve.

Come to next weeks Thanksgiving party on Tuesday at 8:00 am, CST, see you then!

We hope to see you back on Friday when the next party kicks off at 8PM EST and hope you have a wonderful week!

Bet the whole family loves weekend breakfasts with these on the menu I can't wait to see what you have in store for our party next week Thursday 8 PM EST - Sundays at midnight.

Growing up, few things were greater than seeing a bottle of Magic Shell at a birthday party next to the cake and ice cream.

We hope to see you again at the next party!

I expect to see this recipe at a few tailgating parties next football season.

Hope to see you again at the next party.

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off

Hope to see you again at the next Party Under the Big Top too!

Ultimately therefore the decision to extend voting rights to younger people will depend on both whether Labour wins the next election and crucially whether the party sees it as advantageous to increase its vote share slightly at the expense of becoming more reliant on a coalition of disparate interests.

What I don't really see is how the Labour party holding three pilots in this Parliament, or even selecting all of its candidates in some form of primary at the next election or the time after would make any really significant difference to arguments for or against first - past - the - post, the Alternative Vote, AV +, AMS, STV and various hybrids thereof.

So the pluralist challenge for Caroline Lucas is whether she is going to strongly back the Yes campaign, which is seen as positive by most - longstanding pro-PR voices across various campaigns or parties, or continue to argue after the next few weeks over the Bill that there is nothing much at stake, so that through to next May her primary point is that it doesn't really matter if its not PR.

At a guess, they're the ones who hate Nick Clegg but like Vince Cable and don't want the party to be destroyed — and therefore could coherently both 1) hate the coalition and 2) want to see a Lab / Lib pact next time.

The next day saw hugely improved odds for the Lib Dems, with the party 10/1 to win 100 seats or more at the general election.

The more seats a party or grouping has, the more chance it has of forming a government - with 198 seats out of 646 the Conservative Party could only form a government if significant numbers of other MP's decided to back them, as happened in 1924 when there was a situation that the Conservatives didn't want to form a coalition with either other main party and equally the Liberals didn't want a coalition with Labour and the Liberals and Conservatives saw it as an opportunity to allow Labour into government but in a situation in which legislation was still reliant on Liberal and Conservative votes and they could be brought down at the most suitable time, supposing the notional gains were accurate and in the improbable event of the next election going exactly the same way in terms of votes then 214 out of 650 is 32.93 % of seats compared to at 198 out of 646 seats - 30.65 % of seats and the Conservative Party would then be 14 seats closer towards a total neccessary to form a government allowing for the greater number of seats, on the one hand the Conservatives need Labour to fail but equally they need to succeed themselves given that the Liberal Democrats appear likely to oppose anyone forming a government who does not embark on a serious programme to introduce PR, in addition PC & SNP would expect moves towards Independence for Scotland and Wales, the SDLP will be likely to back Labour and equally UKIP would want a committment to withdraw from Europe and anyway will be likely to be in small numbers if any, pretty much that leaves cutting a deal with the DUP which would only add the backing of an extra 10 - 13 party or grouping has, the more chance it has of forming a government - with 198 seats out of 646 the Conservative Party could only form a government if significant numbers of other MP's decided to back them, as happened in 1924 when there was a situation that the Conservatives didn't want to form a coalition with either other main party and equally the Liberals didn't want a coalition with Labour and the Liberals and Conservatives saw it as an opportunity to allow Labour into government but in a situation in which legislation was still reliant on Liberal and Conservative votes and they could be brought down at the most suitable time, supposing the notional gains were accurate and in the improbable event of the next election going exactly the same way in terms of votes then 214 out of 650 is 32.93 % of seats compared to at 198 out of 646 seats - 30.65 % of seats and the Conservative Party would then be 14 seats closer towards a total neccessary to form a government allowing for the greater number of seats, on the one hand the Conservatives need Labour to fail but equally they need to succeed themselves given that the Liberal Democrats appear likely to oppose anyone forming a government who does not embark on a serious programme to introduce PR, in addition PC & SNP would expect moves towards Independence for Scotland and Wales, the SDLP will be likely to back Labour and equally UKIP would want a committment to withdraw from Europe and anyway will be likely to be in small numbers if any, pretty much that leaves cutting a deal with the DUP which would only add the backing of an extra 10 - 13 Party could only form a government if significant numbers of other MP's decided to back them, as happened in 1924 when there was a situation that the Conservatives didn't want to form a coalition with either other main party and equally the Liberals didn't want a coalition with Labour and the Liberals and Conservatives saw it as an opportunity to allow Labour into government but in a situation in which legislation was still reliant on Liberal and Conservative votes and they could be brought down at the most suitable time, supposing the notional gains were accurate and in the improbable event of the next election going exactly the same way in terms of votes then 214 out of 650 is 32.93 % of seats compared to at 198 out of 646 seats - 30.65 % of seats and the Conservative Party would then be 14 seats closer towards a total neccessary to form a government allowing for the greater number of seats, on the one hand the Conservatives need Labour to fail but equally they need to succeed themselves given that the Liberal Democrats appear likely to oppose anyone forming a government who does not embark on a serious programme to introduce PR, in addition PC & SNP would expect moves towards Independence for Scotland and Wales, the SDLP will be likely to back Labour and equally UKIP would want a committment to withdraw from Europe and anyway will be likely to be in small numbers if any, pretty much that leaves cutting a deal with the DUP which would only add the backing of an extra 10 - 13 party and equally the Liberals didn't want a coalition with Labour and the Liberals and Conservatives saw it as an opportunity to allow Labour into government but in a situation in which legislation was still reliant on Liberal and Conservative votes and they could be brought down at the most suitable time, supposing the notional gains were accurate and in the improbable event of the next election going exactly the same way in terms of votes then 214 out of 650 is 32.93 % of seats compared to at 198 out of 646 seats - 30.65 % of seats and the Conservative Party would then be 14 seats closer towards a total neccessary to form a government allowing for the greater number of seats, on the one hand the Conservatives need Labour to fail but equally they need to succeed themselves given that the Liberal Democrats appear likely to oppose anyone forming a government who does not embark on a serious programme to introduce PR, in addition PC & SNP would expect moves towards Independence for Scotland and Wales, the SDLP will be likely to back Labour and equally UKIP would want a committment to withdraw from Europe and anyway will be likely to be in small numbers if any, pretty much that leaves cutting a deal with the DUP which would only add the backing of an extra 10 - 13 Party would then be 14 seats closer towards a total neccessary to form a government allowing for the greater number of seats, on the one hand the Conservatives need Labour to fail but equally they need to succeed themselves given that the Liberal Democrats appear likely to oppose anyone forming a government who does not embark on a serious programme to introduce PR, in addition PC & SNP would expect moves towards Independence for Scotland and Wales, the SDLP will be likely to back Labour and equally UKIP would want a committment to withdraw from Europe and anyway will be likely to be in small numbers if any, pretty much that leaves cutting a deal with the DUP which would only add the backing of an extra 10 - 13 MP's.

Osborne's announcement this week that he wants to see the minimum wage rise to # 7 is the first real sign that the Conservative party is beginning to understand the difficulties they face at the next election and the steps they need to take to counter them.

No sober Labour person looks at the party's opinion poll ratings and sees in them reasons to be entirely confident that they will win on their own at the next election.

I, as a loyal if not wholly enthusiastic supporter of this coalition, see Liberal Democrat spokespeople going on the television and in the press defending in detail policies that I know to be Tory policies that this party does not agree with, which are against party policy and which will not party policy at the next general election... The way in which coalition policy, when it is not Liberal Democrat policy, is being presented has got to change.

The feeling I get is that many see a Labour defeat at the next GE as being a purifying process by which the Labour party can move away from the «sleaze, n, spin» years.

UKIP is assembling at Doncaster Racecourse for its annual conference, riding high on some major victories over the past few months and preparing for a by - election that could well secure the party its first seat in the Commons and, next year, for a general election that will see the leader himself, Nigel Farage, contesting a parliamentary seat.

At a minimum, the legislature should see to it next year that the limit on individual contributions is lowered and that a cap is placed on the amount of money that party committees can devote to «organizational expenditures.»

The lengths to which the Lib Dems will go to try to hang on to votes can be seen in the fact that the President of the party, Tim Farron, has called for them to oppose the Bedroom Tax at the next election.

I suspect that they will win some of the Labour seats on their target list (and I listed the top 50 in that blog post last summer), but I'm not convinced that there will be that many: their position on Iraq marked them out from the other two parties at the last election, leading them to the high water mark they reached - but Iraq will not be an issue next year and it is hard to see which message they could put out which would resonate with voters in the same way.

Come to next weeks Thanksgiving party on Tuesday at 8:00 am, CST, see you then!

Perhaps we'll see your shopping successes at next year's blog birthday party!

We can't wait to see what you've been up to at our next party!

Hope to see you again at the next party.

The story goes like this: the two designers were at a party in the Hamptons and Jacobs» friend asked them about a Gucci - inspired Lego belt they were wearing... and just like that, the next day they had a meeting at the Mercer Hotel and shortly thereafter they saw their Lego accessories walk down the Marc Jacobs runway!

Have a lovely week and see you at the next link party.

Thanks for sharing with us at #overthemoon link party and hope to see you next week.

Hope to see you at the next party with another great item!

I'm currently doing some craft room organization, so perfect timing to see your link at our «Something to Talk About» link up party: — RRB - Hope to see you again next week!

Come to next weeks Thanksgiving party on Tuesday at 8:00 am, CST, see you then!

We hope to see you at the next party and feel free to invite a friend!

Joanne See you and your friends at next week's party!

Thank you so, so much for partying with us at Snickerdoodle Sunday - can't wait to see what you've got next this weekend!

Thank you so much for attending week 17 of #PureBlogLove and linking your fantastic blog post, I can't wait to see what you have in store for our next party, Thursday 8 PM EST - Sundays at midnight.

This funny ugly Christmas sweater will definately make your friends and family giggle when they see you show up wearing it at your next friends or family Christmas party.

Thanks for linking up at the Merry Monday's Linky Party this week, and I hope to see you linking up next week as well.

We sure appreciate it, and we hope to see you at Rhoda's merry mantel link party this Wednesday, Kate's holiday craft link party next Monday, and Sarah's Christmas tree linky party next Wednesday!

Thanks for sharing at Manic Monday linky party, hope to see you next week!

I can't wait to see what you have in store for our party next week Thursday 8 PM EST - Sundays at midnight.

Hope to see you in two weeks at my next party Maria

Hope to see you at my next Fabulous Friday Party in 2 weeks!

From Facebook to Linkedin, Google, and Twitter, you may find yourself excited at one article where your date won a prestigious award, and then in the next moment, cringing when you see his party photos.

A Federal Bank Examiner shows up at a party at Bridget's house, and the next day Bridget sees him at work.

Ahead of its UK release next Friday (March 25th), we've got an exclusive clip from Disorder, the new thriller from writer - director Alice Winocour, which stars Matthias Schoenaerts and Diane Kruger; check it out here... SEE ALSO: Watch the trailer for Disorder here During a lavish party at the family's luxurious «Maryland» villa in the South of -LSB-...]