Sentences with phrase «see you reply here»

Hi Eva, I've just seen your reply here!

And I'm glad to see replies here and there from a Sega employe.

Not exact matches

I'd like to see if I, having just come here, can revitalize the discussion with my replies to some of you.

But happy above all he who, rising beyond aesthetic dilettantism and the materialism of the lower layers of life, is given to hear the reply of all beings, singly and all together: «What you saw gliding past, like a world, behind the song and behind the colour and behind the eyes» glance does not exist just here or there but is a Presence existing equally everywhere: a presence which, though it now seems vague to your feeble sight, will grow in clarity and depth.

Here serious difficulties begin, for, as we have seen, the gospels do not entirely agree about the reply he gave.

Also, replying to your most recent tweet here since I don't have twitter, there's a great blog called The Bite House, which is written by a chef living in the Maritimes, maybe he might have some ideas about things to do / see / eat while you're there.

In the past I've wrote to the PGMOL where I got no reply and also the Football Ombudsman who did have the decency to reply with «I see nothing sinister here» asking if this was fair practise, even though I pointed out they'ed all been appointed by the most corrupt, in my opinion, official ever to officiate in the Premier League.

I must say that this is one of the most logical and best explained replies i have seen here in a while, and I can't do anything else than agree.

Mr lean, I still can't see why some on here don't have the balls to reply they just thumb comments against wenger down, Mohave balls AKB people and comment

@ Annoyed, I also must admit that I slightly underestimated Boro, evn thou I was the one who used to mention to not do that here, I also agree with you about the suggestion of bringing the young guys up to get experienced for the next season.But franckly my friend, please watch the reply of the game again, The boro defense were so opened for an usual full attack Arsenal way of play.In the 1st half they were evn panicking evrytime we attacked of which we shoud have taken advtges but did nt happen.The more attack you launch on pressure to your opponent, the more chance you have for scoring a goal.And we did have the opportunity from the fact that Boro's defense were desorganised during the 1st half and the 1st 20mn of the 2nd half, counter attack launch opportunity were a lot but we just did nt take them, which means that Its us who did nt take our chance at best but not Boro is the good team.Hull city!!? i totaly agree that they are much stronger and physical team, as well as newcastl or westham or portsmouth or Avilla.But that game yestday was not so tight as the same we played agst those team tht I mentioned above, we could have clearly won that game if we played a bit stronger, did nt even need lots of our skill capacity but just a bit of acceleration, then we could have had more chance to score, watch the reply and u will see yourself.

Fair enough — I see your point and I've even voted you up for your neat explanation above here But, since we've moved to linguistic, I want to reply to your «defence» of the quoted claims.

See my longer reply to this further on down here.

Cameron replied: «Everyone can see what is happening here.

Before i saw your reply, i sent in a question for your show with Jimmy Moore on Thursday, about the same after 5 thing i mention here.

i see that Ivan Rivera reply here.

So many great replies here but just to add, almost all interviews I've seen with Dr Greger he says he has no problem with fats from whole food plant based sources such as nuts, avocado, seeds... eaten in the context of a WFPB diet that includes his other recommendations on wholegrains, fruit, vegetables, and legumes.

I passed it along to Darin - here's his reply: it's not that no one else is aware of all the things it's that many people, most people do not do the work of showing up, seeing the processing, growing and testing.

Oh, sorry for the late reply here, I just saw your comment now.

I had a huge response this year (over 20 replies, though I did learn that Chris took the survey, haha... he was the only one to like the cat - related posts the most, unsurprisingly), and I was so excited to learn some more about what you like / don't like or what you'd like to see more of on here.

I'm just a basic member here haven't ever done this before so please forgive me if I don't reply honest giving good sense of humor spontaneous romantic at heart I tell it how I see it enjoy outdoors cooking friends & family sunsets and watching the sun come up

hi guys my name is melanie and i was born and raised in london ont, i am on here to look for someone who is real to get to know and see where things go hopefully date im not into FLINGS, CHEATERS, MANWHORES OR LIARS Please only reply if you are seriously interested in getting to know me and seeing w...

my name is sonia, i saw your profile here and became interested in knowing more about you, i will like you and i to be in good terms.this is where you i will be glad to see your reply soon.

What follows is a list taken from my wall — to see it in full (with replies), click here (you need to friend me first at Author Rachel Thompson): feel free to pick and choose what you feel is worth trying.

Here's the Quick Reply as seen from the main homescreen.

It would definitely be nice to see more actual discussion on the topic... although it looks a little like you've already made up your mind, based on your replies here.

So emails invariably seem to demand a specific & in - depth reply — um, which I often have to get» round to completing... Might be a good idea to keep track of some of my recurring reader dialogue (s), and summarize / respond to them more systematically here instead — we'll see, perhaps it might offer up a couple of interesting insights for readers.

I would love to see more MGS and Kojima related posts on the PS Blog, they hardly post things and reply as well here.

I've written a bit more about this here, which will point you to replies to Nordell just published in the same journal, if you haven't seen them already — William]

Pat, see my other reply here: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/02/24/are-climate-modelers-scientists/#comment-1869787

Harold and Stephen, I can't find a reply symbol next to your posts of this morning, so I'll answer here: Harold, you are right in this regard, we have not identified a central «conductor»; although, as you have seen in my posted speculations, entrainment by an external forcing with a similar rhythm and appropriate coupling strength with a component or components of the climate network may be able to nudge the intrinsic oscillatory nature of the climate system.

The part of that commentary most relevant to the above can be seen starting here along with the four following replies ending with kim's.

To me it is major point of Steve's M analysis of the Parker paper and one that on reviewing the posts here I do not seen a detailed reply.

Or you get the usual reply that it's been «thoroughly debunked — see here (some rubbish link to SKS or RS website)» and no attempt from them to ever explain anything personally.

Mmm, some misplacement here; I didn't realize that my reply to Oliver's second post appeared before his posts and my firtsreply; let's see where this one ends up.

(See Michael Mann's email here to see the three in reverse reply order; chronological order may be somewhat cleareSee Michael Mann's email here to see the three in reverse reply order; chronological order may be somewhat clearesee the three in reverse reply order; chronological order may be somewhat clearer).

Smokey replied: «See what Joel Shore is doing here, folks?

But then see also the replies here Makarieva, A. M. and Gorshkov, V. G.: Reply to A. G. C. A. Meesters et al.'s comment on «Biotic pump of atmospheric moisture as driver of the hydrological cycle on land», Hydrol.

Gavin Schmidt has taken exception to this characterization of his response, who replies (in an email to the New Scientist that was widely circulated, see here for my source):

I do listen to what others say (or I wouldn't be replying here), but I call it like I see it (ususally with a dose of uncertainty and doubt).

[Reply: So would I. For climate, see e.g. here or here if you were to * randomly * search for a second opinion.

It is not good enough to see a templated reply here from the «Help team».

Love, love, love your dining room!And I too am awaiting my copy of Victoria magazine here in Stayton!I was so very sad when they ceased publication a few years back.I can not wait to see the first issue of it's return.I am so glad you FINALLY got yours!I e-mailed them asking when I may see my magazine and the bill as well.Since mailing back the postcard a few weeks ago I have heard nothing from them.Maybe they were inundated with replies and requests.: --RRB- I can not wait to get it... Blessings, Sharon

, I texted my friend Joy to see when the next round of foster care classes might be starting (they only have them every few months here) and wouldn't you know she replied, «tonight ``.