Sentences with phrase «see your points show»

For all airline transfer partners, you'll see your points show up immediately in your account.

I haven't seen the points show up either, whereas other Marriott points have shown up the next day (twitter responds for 50 points).

Every day, hoping to see the points show up.

Not exact matches

While the consumer spending report is only one small data point among a dozen factors, it could be a sign that we will see pay stabilization, and even show us a slight increase over the next few months.

Liss - Riordan attempted to show the judge that it met seven of the nine points of the test, and told journalists after the hearing that she hopes he sees that the scales tip on that side.

Additionally, Tchir argues that European investors have shown a proclivity to rush into trades leading to what he calls «periods of violent indigestion,» pointing to the big swing in German bund yields seen early last year following the European Central Bank's announcement of more QE as a prime example.

But as the Wall Street Journal pointed out, the tablet at the trade show was only shown with a cover, which made it impossible to see if it had the mark of a non-DPRK manufacturer.

«The collaboration we saw was some billing and administrative contacts between the two of them, so you'd see similar people show up in each of the accounts,» said Schroepfer, when asked for more detail about what it had found, before declining to say anything else in a public setting on account of ongoing investigations — despite the committee pointing out other witnesses it has heard from have not held back on that front.

As usual, the left scale shows log values (see Two Point Three Sigmas Above the Norm to see why).

The point «B» shows a relief we are experiencing today, but it seems like that the relief may be over, see «C».

For example, if you're able to license your brand to somebody else, or if you're able to have a very large social media following to the point that you're able to see advertising revenue derived from your showing another person's product, or showing what stores your product is going to be in.»

Had I «showed up» mentally and analyzed the company like I know I am able to, I would have been better served (although I'm not saying I would have been able to avoid — see my point about diversification).

If you find yourself on the efficient frontier past the tangency point (see above), one can easily show that reducing risk involves no cash holdings, but rather keeping all of your portfolio in risky assets.

The GDP and retail sales data, pointing to more cautious expenditure by US households, contrasted with readings for consumer confidence, which generally showed little sign of dipping from the elevated levels seen since the US election.

Excellent point, John Jay, like the George Takei photo I saw on Facebook says, «Great Leaders don't tell You what to do... They show You how it's done.»

You have a point if you show us that, not 80 %, but 50 % of Khomeini's own people (Shia) see him as incompetent.

As Russell Hittinger has shown in his book The First Grace: Rediscovering the Natural Law in a Post-Christian Society (see chapter four), St. Thomas's point is not that the judge corrects a flawed human law in favor of the natural law.

How it must grieve God to see people trying to «one - up» someone with Bible verses!!!!! His point was to reprimand you and show his superiority I guess.

I saw that Joseph was like my adoptive father who showed an earthly fatherly love which pointed to the source of unconditional love....

I don't dismiss the possibility of demons, possession, hunters named Sam and Dean who are too gorgeous and may show up on my doorstep one day carrying salt shotguns and holy water... * ahem * but I digress... I don't dismiss those possibilities, but I do see them as infinitely rare to the point of almost improbable.

We see many great people of God throughout the Bible at their lowest points and how their faith in God led them to be used for great things (and so despite their grievous sin we see them as holy because they grew and showed great faith and fruit) but what about those in the Bible who are said to have believed but are never heard from again in the text?

One frequently cited bar graph has been used to suggest, for the decade 1965 - 75, a severe diminution of seven mainline Protestant bodies by contrast both with their gains in the preceding ten years and with the continuing growth of selected conservative churches (see Jackson W. Carroll et al., Religion in America, 1950 to the Present [Harper & Row, 19791, p. 15) The gap in growth rates for 1965 - 75, as shown on that graph, is more than 29 percentage points (an average loss in the oldline denominations of 8.9 per cent against average gains among the conservatives of 20.5 per cent) This is indeed a substantial difference, but it does not approach the difference in growth rates recorded for the same religious groups in the 1930s, when the discrepancy amounted to 62 percentage points.

Plus I was so looking forward to this episode because of Keeley Hawes — ever since I first saw «Wives and Daughters» and «Upstairs Downstairs» (the remake), I was hoping for her to show up on DW at some point.

Irony is ever present in the writings of St John, and Our Lord's words, though part of divine revelation to all, nevertheless gently point out the fault of the one who will only see Jesus by night: «men have shown they prefer darkness to the light» (Jn 3, 19) and «the man who lives by the truth comes out into the light» (Jn 3, 21).

Cecilia, it gets even worse when you realize that many of these men are the same people who push the modesty movement — meaning that they believe men are uncontrollable hormone monsters who can't keep themselves in check if they see a woman showing too much skin — and often believe in complimentarism to the point where men are wild and reckless and need wives to «tame» them.

In case Abraham is not a nullity, a phantom, a show one employs for a pastime, then the fault can never consist in the fact that the sinner wants to do likewise, but the point is to see how great a thing it was that Abraham did, in order that man may judge for himself whether he has the call and the courage to be subjected to such a test.

Others can be won to your point of view if you will follow such practices as avoiding arguments, showing respect for the opinions of others, and trying to see the other's point of view.

And while I see how true your point is that we should teach less and obey more... I need to be shown how to obey more.

You'll see the first sign of them growing with a tiny white tip showing at the pointed end of each seed.

From a visitor point of view this is very valuable; it means they will see a much greater variety of potential suppliers and companies they just won't see at other shows.

We also had a goal disallowed but Mustafi was offside before heading a free kick past Courtois, and Chelsea had chances as well, though, but not too many and it was an even game that saw Gunners show real grit and get a rare point at Stamford Bridge.

It remains to be seen whether or not they get behind the team following the win, as ultimately they showed great character and determination to get the three points.

i really loved it and the fans in the stadium have shown that they will love and stop being quiet if they see that the team fights for it and to the «fans» on here who always repeated that they are happy as long as the tactic and the teams fight and mentality is on point i hope you keep your word and credit wenger and the eleven who are playing right now, show to sanchez and özil what you can do without them, COYG

If anyone watched the game you could see that Mourinho set up his team to go for a point, I think pound for pound City are the only team that really has the attacking prowess to make Chelsea wary and they didn't really show much adventure going forward today, think the red card and the fact they scored first kinda erases that from our memories.

There is nothing that Arsenal can do to affect the state of the Premier League table, at least until Monday night when we play host to a West Brom team that has not been showing the usual defensive solidity that we expect to see from a Tony Pulis managed team but is still a point better off than the Gunners.

We were always a strong team and recent results shows that our players are believing that too cant wait for the NLD... See us securing those three points @ the end of the game

Finally on Friday he was able to show on a national stage what Nets fans have seen all year: At 6» 7 with his athleticism, he's one of the best backup point guards in the league and a capable starter.

An impressive performance in midweek at Arsenal didn't gain them any points, but a repeats showing of that ilk could see the progress to the quarter - finals.

And the other 2 small teams see Arsenal as an good option to get points from, so they are not going to have an actuall show down amonst each other for the 3 place.

this season was supposed to be about the epl not fourth place.just seeing how empty the Emirates was yesterday I expect it to be even worse in the upcoming games.wenger blew it in the transfer market, I think that in itself shows how we lacked ambition and we settled for a top four from the beginning and if by a chance we managed to win epl then thats it.lossing some games, crucial points and the feedback we got back was just covering the real goals of the club top four.soton home (a team challenging has to win this game), Crystal palace, swansea, just add those points and see where we could and should hve been.everyone here is a die hard arsenal fan whether an akb or aob but fact remains we love the club, we want the club to move forward, we want the club to be a superhouse, its got nothing to do with wengers last year or his last chance of epl.this sort of thinking is running our beloved club to the ground.whether u like it or not a change is needed and a serious one.at the moment we hve so many bogey teams do u think arsene will beat them nxt season!!!

That season (2013 2014) we won five points out of five derby games (liverpool, everton, manure, city, spuds) This season we have four derby games, and with the form shown, I don't see them wining a single one of those games, maybe they can draw against manure and Everton and that's it.

Now that injuries have exposed our dire CB situation, and games against the likes of Chelsea (who are on fire with 9 point gap above us and with a balanced team at that) have shown how weak our midfield core is, I have to come to see that we are still a bit far from winning the league.

As you can see, over 30 % of games we analyzed finished with a 3 - point or 7 - point margin of victory, showing exactly why sharp bettors consider these to be «key numbers».

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I can point to treansfers going up to 2 decades to show the pattern but fans never want to see that as it is easier to blame Wenger for 100 %

If we will not show up and give it too easy then I see no point in us being on Wembley for the semis.

but the way i see it is that if we wait till Deadline Day we will Probably sign 1 Player (a Striker or a CDM) when in this case we actually Need Both!!!!!! Theres no Point in signing Suarez on Deadline Day and yet leave the obvious CDM Position empty... just like we've been doing for the past years... We signed Özil on Deadline Day and that was it...... which shows that when you sign a Big Player on the last Day thats most likely going to be the only Business you do.

Shack should be able to take 15 to 20 off of him but I hope it doesn't negate his ability to own the paint and back people down... he did show the ability to drive a little tonight but his shooting is suspect at this point (not seeing the Jenkins comparison), he has literally zero verticle explosiveness (not seeing the Paschall comparison at all) but he can rebound, has great footwork around the rim and has a good spin move that he does have a quickness out of to the rim.

He's shown that he can knock down a 3FG (USA camp) but his stats from AAU, the people I've talked to about his high school play and from what I've seen in person all point to him not being an outside threat.

yep and @ozgunner and @rkw i do nt see why it angers and agitates you so much when i insult fans who abuse wenger, look i am not the kind of naive guy who thinks everybody should be nice to eachother of course that would be nice, but when i hate some opinions of some people i do get annoyed a lot of times and i do show it and its truth i am not a supporter of the belief that one has to respect all opinions equally because i am firm believer that there are dump opinions for example when a conservative talks about homophob things i am pretty sure that i will insult him and some will say its wrong and will say its right its your opinion but back to your point..