Sentences with phrase «see your reply because»

Not exact matches

When asked if evangelical ministers had «changed» because of his ministry, Charles replied that he saw many struggling seriously to overcome prejudices and felt that there would be a different attitude in the future.

And the kid will reply, well if you had been a father instead of a politician, you would have seen who I was earlier and would accept me for who I am, not denounce me because your side of the rope doesn't like it..

He replied, «I don't want to see the drawing on the first page of the chapter because I want to think about what things look like all by myself.»

You said, «All confirmed by Hawking reply see: Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow, The Grand Design (New York: Bantam Books, 2010), 161 — 62» In your reference, the authors write, «Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing.

Dear Ella — don't worry about replying because I saw you have 150,000 visitors a day!

Her reply was «But you can't make cake without eggs»!!!! Even though she had just had one, and loved it!!!!! Actually I find it really depressing, because this is a way I love to promote vegan food, by showing people how great it is, but they still can't see it * sigh * P.S. this cake looks great!

Hi it's Morgan, I'm not sure if you saw my comment or not because I didn't get a reply also I don't see it above!

When he was asked about defenses having seen him and could better prepare for him, his reply was he was also better prepared for those defenses because he seen them, too.

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off

I did not like it when you said «I know you are not an Arsenal fan» just because he has comments you didn't like... We moan not because we lost a single match or a couple of matches rather than the system runs this club... Wenger is the arrowhead of the system, didn't he say he has a strong say of how things running in this club... We see moaning and raising banners and chants toward the board and the manager might have a positive effect, you see it the other way, that's all... BTW I like your reply this time...

We're basically out of Europe now, because I can't see us scoring three with out reply in France.

NY - Gunner, If you're reading, I gave you a late reply because I just seen it when I woke up this morning.

I was about to reply — that I seen some that must of got past admin because I could of sworn I heard him mouthing / insulting off at people in other articles.

Replying to my own comment, yes, because after reading over it myself, I saw that I completely came off as angry and depressed.

I think I'm only up there because I post in a different time zone to most of you, and just have to reply to things when I see them (even if it is a day after the rest of you).

In response to a comment I made about a behavior seldom seen in French kids, she replied laughing, «That's because the French would beat the shit out of them if they tried it.»

i knew the great man when i read some wonderful reviews about Dr OSAUYI how he has helped a lots of people on there relationship problem i was reading a magazine which then i saw great testimonies as well which then i decided not to waste time because i have missed my lover so much i decided to contact him and share all my problem with him which then he told me not to worry that he assures me that within 48 hours everything would be sorted out i believed Dr OSAUYI so much because i believe he can't fail me but truly Dr OSAUYI never failed me a man that stand on his worlds is really a man, my husband who left me for good a year plus replied my text and returned my calls and asked me to please forgive him i was so happy am so grateful to Dr OSAUYI for what he has done for me if you are there pass the same problem or any kinds of problem just contact the great man on [email protected] call his mobile number [phone].

«Yes, because I'd seen the email,» Crone replies.

«While I am proud of California's legal cannabis law, I can see why saying this to you can be misinterpreted because you are not 21,» Lieu wrote in reply to Kashuv about the post.

In fact, this can't happen because they've designed the site so that you can always see your messages, and always reply to them for free.

You will receive all messages in your personal email and reply to messages there, without letting others know your email address because what they see is [email protected].

Chalamet replies, quick as a knife: «It is because of Heath Ledger in The Dark Knight, Philip Seymour Hoffman in Death of a Salesman, Adam Sandler in Punch - Drunk Love, Denzel Washington in Fences on Broadway...» So seeing other people act was the spur?

That is the challenge we face today to achieve the MDGs, to which we must reply with a new awareness - identity of «Homeland - Earth», where the human being is seen as a same biological specie with the same evolution, because the future history of our biosphere will depend of the future history of knowledge we develop and how we choose to apply it.

Because every time I see a reply from you, it tells «dirty engine, use additives»:)

Could n`t reply you because there are some comment limits (hope you will see my answer).

I've noticed a severe drop off in requests whenever I'm not the first post and I presume others have seen the same because people are just going to reply to the first post.

I however was interested in what you'd reply, because I've now clearly pointed out what you're doing, I want to see if you'd actually reply properly this time... it's very unlikely though.

Just had to make sure everyone saw the list you spent so much time coming up with because the first reply you made was hidden by the Trolling comment.

could you guys please reply back to me and see if you guys can get where i am going at because it's difficult for me to explain.

Notably, 1953 was also a pivotal year for de Kooning, who finally found staunch critical support and solid financial success following the exhibition of paintings and drawings from his Woman series at the Janis Gallery that spring.22 By then, Rauschenberg had known de Kooning for a year or more and had seen him on occasion, often through their mutual friend Jack Tworkov (1900 — 1982), who sublet studio space from de Kooning.23 Even as other details of the Erased de Kooning Drawing story changed, Rauschenberg always insisted that he chose de Kooning out of deep respect for his work and because there was no question that a drawing of his would be considered art — and this was more true than ever in 1953.24 Critic Leo Steinberg later reported asking Rauschenberg whether he would have erased a drawing by Rembrandt, to which he replied no.

because some other well meaning pro - agw / cc action person, wiht good intentions will naively use the «source» as being «credible science» and post that url as reply to a dumb - ass on wuwt, the guardian or some Murdoch news portal, and they they will be attacked by idiotic deniers who will see the ERROR in a flash, and then this merely gives them another Bullet to fire at those «crazy scientists» etc..

Thank you for your reply but I don't see how that fits in to the discussion as to whether the scientists can not be trusted because they have a vested interest in getting more research grants (which is the point I was responding to above https://judithcurry.com/2011/05/26/the-futility-of-carbon-reduction/#comment-70889).

To which I'd reply to Monckton: If you see something lying on the ground that looks like a dog turd, feels like a dog turd, and smells like a dog turd, by all means go ahead and taste it, because who knows, right?

That's because if your account is private then other people can't see your tweets, retweet your tweets, and if you reply to other people's tweets — they can't see those replies unless you have already approved that person to see your account.

Abby replied that because Jennifer had difficulty fitting into a regular stall, she saw nothing wrong with using the larger one so long as there was no one in a wheelchair, for example, also needing to use it.

Fox tells me that when the chat is end - to - end encrypted, features like smart replies and the Google Assistant simply can't work because Google's algorithms can't see the content of the chats, either.

The message sent without issue, but herein I ran into my next problem: Because my car only has standard - issue Bluetooth and not CarPlay, I couldn't see if he had replied.

Vistnes replied that he did because, in part, there was evidence that consumers wanted to see the information that VOWs want to deliver.

I've even seen, rewrites of offers during the presentation of offers, this has occurred because the buyer & buyers realtor showed up to the place of presentation, they were not the only buyers & realtors sitting waiting for a reply, where the offers were presented.

It'll be super handy if you have a question about something we blogged about because you won't have to come back to our blog to see if we replied.

I actually expected this kind of response from someone (because I can see it from your perspective too), so I'm ready with my reply.

I've decided not to reply because she's obviously not going to «get» it: that nasty comments are wrong, that I've been kind to my ex and my kids see it every day, that it's best not to judge without having the full facts.