Sentences with phrase «see your side of things»

Expect to see this side of things improve.

When we try to see their side of things, they try to see our side of things, and they don't want to disappoint us.

I just hope people who are so passionate about other moms snugging upto their infants can maybe see this side of things.

Having empathy for your partner will help you see their side of things and understand why they react to things the way they do.

Not exact matches

Continuing with the dog food example, we can see that ratings, comparison, and reviews all were all grouped as closely related to dog food in general, implying that people that are searching for dog food are very interested in the comparison and review side of things.

Along the right - hand side of the resume, you'll see things like similar descriptions of the jobs you've listed in your resume, a list of skills that are applicable to the jobs you've listed, job openings that fit your experience and access to resume coaches and professionals who can guide you to your next position.

Of course, fear isn't rational — you don't see people giving toaster ovens the side - eye, and many other things that people are afraid of, including public speaking and spiders, are unlikely to harm you eitheOf course, fear isn't rational — you don't see people giving toaster ovens the side - eye, and many other things that people are afraid of, including public speaking and spiders, are unlikely to harm you eitheof, including public speaking and spiders, are unlikely to harm you either.

Looking at Sundar's strategy on the Google side of things, I've only seen it grow in the areas we're focused on and thinking about addressing.

Antitrust regulators on both sides of the pond, however, saw things differently and took Apple and the publishers to task.

«We don't miss any demographics but we miss one psychographic — people who can't see the positive side of things,» John Jacobs told me during a recent interview, during which I kept my dark underbelly discreetly cloaked.

[16:00] Pain + reflection = progress [16:30] Creating a meritocracy to draw the best out of everybody [18:30] How to raise your probability of being right [18:50] Why we are conditioned to need to be right [19:30] The neuroscience factor [19:50] The habitual and environmental factor [20:20] How to get to the other side [21:20] Great collective decision - making [21:50] The 5 things you need to be successful [21:55] Create audacious goals [22:15] Why you need problems [22:25] Diagnose the problems to determine the root causes [22:50] Determine the design for what you will do about the root causes [23:00] Decide to work with people who are strong where you are weak [23:15] Push through to results [23:20] The loop of success [24:15] Ray's new instinctual approach to failure [24:40] Tony's ritual after every event [25:30] The review that changed Ray's outlook on leadership [27:30] Creating new policies based on fairness and truth [28:00] What people are missing about Ray's culture [29:30] Creating meaningful work and meaningful relationships [30:15] The importance of radical honesty [30:50] Thoughtful disagreement [32:10] Why it was the relationships that changed Ray's life [33:10] Ray's biggest weakness and how he overcame it [34:30] The jungle metaphor [36:00] The dot collector — deciding what to listen to [40:15] The wanting of meritocratic decision - making [41:40] How to see bubbles and busts [42:40] Productivity [43:00] Where we are in the cycle [43:40] What the Fed will do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us together?

The government might remain powerless to the P2P side of things, but they will wait to see it's influence in the real world, track the source, and tax based on that.

One thing is certain: With the impending closing of Oscar Mayer, 2017 will see a big shake - up in the city's economic base and in the rhythm of the North Side neighborhood that is not likely to be resolved anytime soon.

But, as we've seen from Chipotle's troubles over the past 20 years, it seems, now — I guess it hasn't been that long — it's just really difficult to actually marry the fast food side of things with high quality, locally sourced ingredients.

«I'd argue it's more on the psychological side of things, whereby people see a new major policy pointed at the housing market and take a bit of a step back, temporarily reassess where they are in the marketplace before perhaps moving back into the market.»

I see it as a positive, as we get more regulation and we get more individuals in the community that are more from the economic and infrastructure side of things.

A year earlier, in July of 2014, Yellen said valuations were generally in line with historical norms, but «some things may be on the high side, and there may be some pockets where we see valuations becoming very stretched.»

This is the thing: when you start to hit 28 or 30, everything starts to divide, and you can see very clearly two kinds of people: on one side, people who have used their 20s to learn and grow, to find God and themselves and their deep dreams, people who know what works and what doesn't, who have pushed through to become real live adults.

When you're in the hospital with a cellulitis and the only thing that will save your life is more than a century of research and development, I'd like to be there to see if you take a side.

So the thing is, when you see someone say they don't want the bible, christianity or any theology pushed down their throats, it's not only because of the constant annoyance of dealing with people walking up to my door, people on the side of the street, coworkers, etc..

There is no evidence of a god this side of the Big Bang; every thing we see has a pretty good scientific explanation based on evidence.

You can see the same thing happen with any story mentioning a politician (immediate response of «you're side is all wrong» and «you do it too.»)

At least, this is the way one side of the religion debate sees things.

So we're at the place where we can say a couple - four things from the existential side of the problem of evil: [1] from the perspective that pain exists, and we perceive it, we as human beings (you could say «people») have an urge to do something about it when we see it.

I would say all sides come to the forefront, but I think that some of us see things from more than one side to begin with and that there are many «sides» (perspectives) that are out there, I don't think it is a polemic, and I don't think it is «sides» in terms of choosing sides in a war... more a dialogue where confrontations take place, but (hopefully) most of the time not with the intent of winners and losers (or, if that is the intent, that hopefully we realize that and adjust our own rhetoric to move away from that pardigm)

For example, it could be argued that the «things of the Spirit» that Paul is referring to are about the deeper truths and mysteries of the gospel that Paul has been referring to previously in 1 Corinthians 2:9 - 15 (See Vance, The Other Side of Calvinism, 231).

One of the wonderful things about the Episcopal Church and other mainline traditions is their affirmation of reason and their willingness to see both sides of an argument and be open to ambiguity.

Even though the religious often mock things like evolution I really don't see why we need to sink to their level of argument, especially when we have the evidence on our side to support our arguments, right?

Everyone has a creative side, and I've seen the fellas get just as into this sort of thing as the ladies, so don't exclude them!

Lots to see and hear, and I always come home feeling better, closer to the good side of things.

He had a tendency to see the negative side of things.

I am concerned that America is seeing more an more of so - called «experts» who write things that have a ring of truth to them socially, but they do not do a thorough job in explaining all sides of the picture.

You see, no matter what side of the election issue you are on, one thing we can all agree on is that it is wonderful to be chosen as part of God's team.

Those who always saw the bright side of things were full of confidence and hope.

Amen.The thing is too many people from both sides try to disprove the other, Scientist (well some) will say there is no God Ala Hawkings here and then some believers will say that evolution or anything pertaining to science that they don't understand is false.I don't believe that science and God are mutually exclusive.For me personally science helps to explain a lot of things regarding creation, almost like giving me a window into how creative God is.I believe that God uses science to show us how awesome he is.To me science does not disprove Gods existence it actually reaffirms it on a human logic level, for me.You may disagree, that's fine, but this is just how I see it.

In other and particular matters, great and small, we shall be remembered as a generation that saw only one side of things.

If you see a problem of either side demonizing the other, like Richard has, by all means, lets be civil and human in all things, to all people.

First, Whitehead emphasizes that the signs for numerals, letters, and mathematical operations are not the outward side of a language essentially different from, and more mysterious than everyday language, but that they are introduced to relieve the brain (see IM 39) and «to make things easy» (IM 40).

Personally, after seeing some of the things that the leaders on both sides of the isle condone, I don't consider myself a political anything anymore...

For in truth it is as if a man, instead of naturally using both eyes to see one thing, should use one eye to see one side and the other eye to see the other side.

And I see a bit of the savory side of things too, how fun!

When we got back to Oregon our hotel room (like I waited until we went home), one of the first things I did was search to see what I could find on Hot Chicken, and was absolutely thrilled to find Hattie B's recipe right here, in Lee Brian Schrager's cookbook Fried & True: More than 50 Recipes for America's Best Fried Chicken and Sides.

I saw that thing sailing through the air and hit my grandmother right in the side of the head.

You see, being an optimistic by heart has this side effect that I sometimes a lot of times end up thinking I can manage 1043 things in a very short amount of time.

Going loco for the coco Onto the sweetener side of things, if you've gotten ahead of yourself and scrolled down to the ingredients list (which might I add is only seven in total, most of which you probably have in your kitchen right now), you might have seen that I've used dark coconut nectar instead of actual maple syrup.

I love your sunny - side way of seeing things - it's inspiring!

There's still a lot of offseason left, though, and the important things to remember are a) the Nationals didn't have very far to go and they're already a little better, b) missing out on Jansen and Melancon might be a good thing, and c) you'll forgive them a minor panic in their search for a new closer because they've seen the dark side of an inconsistent bullpen.

There is not really anything at all wrong with what you say, the thing is though: I have seen some of the finest captains inside of football, hold nothing back, in confronting a teammate who is letting the side down.

I'd just like to see Wenger address the defensive side of things and get a rock in the heart of defence and an enforcer in midfield..

Unless we lose our next 3 games, I don't see anything changing on the tactical side of things for Arsenal.